Lowell S Kabnick Md, Katheen Ozsvath Md, Jorge H Ulloa Md
{"title":"选定的血液学摘要。","authors":"Lowell S Kabnick Md, Katheen Ozsvath Md, Jorge H Ulloa Md","doi":"10.1177/02683555231170492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors investigated different laser fi ber tip con fi gurations to outcomes regarding technical success and incidence of complications. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with documented great saphenous vein (GSV) re fl ux from 2020 to 2022, comparing baseline parameters and outcome between 2 groups of laser tip fi bers used; radial tip and jacketed tip. The primary endpoint was technical success. Secondary endpoints included incidence of complications in each group, and venous clinical severity score (VCSS) difference in both groups. Inclusion criteria entailed patients with primary varicose veins over the age of 18 years, free from malignancy, hematological disorders, and having documented GSV re fl ux of more than 0.5 seconds. All patients had endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the GSV, with comple-mentary foam sclerotherapy or ambulatory phlebectomies as required. A total of 74 patients underwent EVLA (85 limbs). 54 limbs utilized the radial laser fi bers, and the remaining utilized jacketed fi bers. Technical success was achieved in 92.9%; 6 limbs (7.1%) had recanalization of the proximal 3 cm GSV at 1 month; 2 patients experienced hematomas; and 5 patients had super fi cial vein thrombosis. There was no signi fi cant association between postoperative pain, bruising, recanalization, hematoma","PeriodicalId":20139,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":"38 4","pages":"291-294"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selected phlebological abstracts.\",\"authors\":\"Lowell S Kabnick Md, Katheen Ozsvath Md, Jorge H Ulloa Md\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02683555231170492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors investigated different laser fi ber tip con fi gurations to outcomes regarding technical success and incidence of complications. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with documented great saphenous vein (GSV) re fl ux from 2020 to 2022, comparing baseline parameters and outcome between 2 groups of laser tip fi bers used; radial tip and jacketed tip. The primary endpoint was technical success. Secondary endpoints included incidence of complications in each group, and venous clinical severity score (VCSS) difference in both groups. Inclusion criteria entailed patients with primary varicose veins over the age of 18 years, free from malignancy, hematological disorders, and having documented GSV re fl ux of more than 0.5 seconds. All patients had endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the GSV, with comple-mentary foam sclerotherapy or ambulatory phlebectomies as required. A total of 74 patients underwent EVLA (85 limbs). 54 limbs utilized the radial laser fi bers, and the remaining utilized jacketed fi bers. Technical success was achieved in 92.9%; 6 limbs (7.1%) had recanalization of the proximal 3 cm GSV at 1 month; 2 patients experienced hematomas; and 5 patients had super fi cial vein thrombosis. There was no signi fi cant association between postoperative pain, bruising, recanalization, hematoma\",\"PeriodicalId\":20139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phlebology\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"291-294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phlebology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555231170492\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555231170492","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The authors investigated different laser fi ber tip con fi gurations to outcomes regarding technical success and incidence of complications. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with documented great saphenous vein (GSV) re fl ux from 2020 to 2022, comparing baseline parameters and outcome between 2 groups of laser tip fi bers used; radial tip and jacketed tip. The primary endpoint was technical success. Secondary endpoints included incidence of complications in each group, and venous clinical severity score (VCSS) difference in both groups. Inclusion criteria entailed patients with primary varicose veins over the age of 18 years, free from malignancy, hematological disorders, and having documented GSV re fl ux of more than 0.5 seconds. All patients had endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the GSV, with comple-mentary foam sclerotherapy or ambulatory phlebectomies as required. A total of 74 patients underwent EVLA (85 limbs). 54 limbs utilized the radial laser fi bers, and the remaining utilized jacketed fi bers. Technical success was achieved in 92.9%; 6 limbs (7.1%) had recanalization of the proximal 3 cm GSV at 1 month; 2 patients experienced hematomas; and 5 patients had super fi cial vein thrombosis. There was no signi fi cant association between postoperative pain, bruising, recanalization, hematoma
期刊介绍:
The leading scientific journal devoted entirely to venous disease, Phlebology is the official journal of several international societies devoted to the subject. It publishes the results of high quality studies and reviews on any factor that may influence the outcome of patients with venous disease. This journal provides authoritative information about all aspects of diseases of the veins including up to the minute reviews, original articles, and short reports on the latest treatment procedures and patient outcomes to help medical practitioners, allied health professionals and scientists stay up-to-date on developments.
Print ISSN: 0268-3555