选定的血液学摘要。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Lowell S Kabnick Md, Katheen Ozsvath Md, Jorge H Ulloa Md
{"title":"选定的血液学摘要。","authors":"Lowell S Kabnick Md, Katheen Ozsvath Md, Jorge H Ulloa Md","doi":"10.1177/02683555231170492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors investigated different laser fi ber tip con fi gurations to outcomes regarding technical success and incidence of complications. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with documented great saphenous vein (GSV) re fl ux from 2020 to 2022, comparing baseline parameters and outcome between 2 groups of laser tip fi bers used; radial tip and jacketed tip. The primary endpoint was technical success. Secondary endpoints included incidence of complications in each group, and venous clinical severity score (VCSS) difference in both groups. Inclusion criteria entailed patients with primary varicose veins over the age of 18 years, free from malignancy, hematological disorders, and having documented GSV re fl ux of more than 0.5 seconds. All patients had endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the GSV, with comple-mentary foam sclerotherapy or ambulatory phlebectomies as required. A total of 74 patients underwent EVLA (85 limbs). 54 limbs utilized the radial laser fi bers, and the remaining utilized jacketed fi bers. Technical success was achieved in 92.9%; 6 limbs (7.1%) had recanalization of the proximal 3 cm GSV at 1 month; 2 patients experienced hematomas; and 5 patients had super fi cial vein thrombosis. There was no signi fi cant association between postoperative pain, bruising, recanalization, hematoma","PeriodicalId":20139,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":"38 4","pages":"291-294"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selected phlebological abstracts.\",\"authors\":\"Lowell S Kabnick Md, Katheen Ozsvath Md, Jorge H Ulloa Md\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02683555231170492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors investigated different laser fi ber tip con fi gurations to outcomes regarding technical success and incidence of complications. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with documented great saphenous vein (GSV) re fl ux from 2020 to 2022, comparing baseline parameters and outcome between 2 groups of laser tip fi bers used; radial tip and jacketed tip. The primary endpoint was technical success. Secondary endpoints included incidence of complications in each group, and venous clinical severity score (VCSS) difference in both groups. Inclusion criteria entailed patients with primary varicose veins over the age of 18 years, free from malignancy, hematological disorders, and having documented GSV re fl ux of more than 0.5 seconds. All patients had endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the GSV, with comple-mentary foam sclerotherapy or ambulatory phlebectomies as required. A total of 74 patients underwent EVLA (85 limbs). 54 limbs utilized the radial laser fi bers, and the remaining utilized jacketed fi bers. Technical success was achieved in 92.9%; 6 limbs (7.1%) had recanalization of the proximal 3 cm GSV at 1 month; 2 patients experienced hematomas; and 5 patients had super fi cial vein thrombosis. There was no signi fi cant association between postoperative pain, bruising, recanalization, hematoma\",\"PeriodicalId\":20139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phlebology\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"291-294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phlebology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555231170492\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555231170492","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selected phlebological abstracts.
The authors investigated different laser fi ber tip con fi gurations to outcomes regarding technical success and incidence of complications. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with documented great saphenous vein (GSV) re fl ux from 2020 to 2022, comparing baseline parameters and outcome between 2 groups of laser tip fi bers used; radial tip and jacketed tip. The primary endpoint was technical success. Secondary endpoints included incidence of complications in each group, and venous clinical severity score (VCSS) difference in both groups. Inclusion criteria entailed patients with primary varicose veins over the age of 18 years, free from malignancy, hematological disorders, and having documented GSV re fl ux of more than 0.5 seconds. All patients had endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the GSV, with comple-mentary foam sclerotherapy or ambulatory phlebectomies as required. A total of 74 patients underwent EVLA (85 limbs). 54 limbs utilized the radial laser fi bers, and the remaining utilized jacketed fi bers. Technical success was achieved in 92.9%; 6 limbs (7.1%) had recanalization of the proximal 3 cm GSV at 1 month; 2 patients experienced hematomas; and 5 patients had super fi cial vein thrombosis. There was no signi fi cant association between postoperative pain, bruising, recanalization, hematoma
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Phlebology
Phlebology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
84
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The leading scientific journal devoted entirely to venous disease, Phlebology is the official journal of several international societies devoted to the subject. It publishes the results of high quality studies and reviews on any factor that may influence the outcome of patients with venous disease. This journal provides authoritative information about all aspects of diseases of the veins including up to the minute reviews, original articles, and short reports on the latest treatment procedures and patient outcomes to help medical practitioners, allied health professionals and scientists stay up-to-date on developments. Print ISSN: 0268-3555
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信