在有经验和没有经验的牙科种植从业者中,徒手和外科引导种植体放置的准确性比较:一项体外研究。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-24 DOI:10.5051/jpis.2204700235
Dler Raouf Hama, Bayad Jaza Mahmood
{"title":"在有经验和没有经验的牙科种植从业者中,徒手和外科引导种植体放置的准确性比较:一项体外研究。","authors":"Dler Raouf Hama,&nbsp;Bayad Jaza Mahmood","doi":"10.5051/jpis.2204700235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated the accuracy of free-hand implant surgery performed by an experienced operator compared to static guided implant surgery performed by an inexperienced operator on an anterior maxillary dental model arch.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A maxillary dental model with missing teeth (No. 11, 22, and 23) was used for this <i>in vitro</i> study. An intraoral scan was performed on the model, with the resulting digital impression exported as a stereolithography file. Next, a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was performed, with the resulting image exported as a Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine file. Both files were imported into the RealGUIDE 5.0 dental implant planning software. Active Bio implants were selected to place into the model. A single stereolithographic 3-dimensional surgical guide was printed for all cases. Ten clinicians, divided into 2 groups, placed a total of 60 implants in 20 acrylic resin maxillary models. Due to the small sample size, the Mann-Whitney test was used to analyze mean values in the 2 groups. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The accuracy of implant placement using a surgical guide was significantly higher than that of free-hand implantation. The mean difference between the planned and actual implant positions at the apex was 0.68 mm for the experienced group using the free-hand technique and 0.14 mm for the non-experienced group using the surgical guide technique (<i>P</i>=0.019). At the top of the implant, the mean difference was 1.04 mm for the experienced group using the free-hand technique and 0.52 mm for the non-experienced group using the surgical guide technique (<i>P</i>=0.044).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The data from this study will provide valuable insights for future studies, since <i>in vitro</i> studies should be conducted extensively in advance of retrospective or prospective studies to avoid burdening patients unnecessarily.</p>","PeriodicalId":48795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science","volume":" ","pages":"388-401"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627737/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of accuracy between free-hand and surgical guide implant placement among experienced and non-experienced dental implant practitioners: an <i>in vitro</i> study.\",\"authors\":\"Dler Raouf Hama,&nbsp;Bayad Jaza Mahmood\",\"doi\":\"10.5051/jpis.2204700235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated the accuracy of free-hand implant surgery performed by an experienced operator compared to static guided implant surgery performed by an inexperienced operator on an anterior maxillary dental model arch.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A maxillary dental model with missing teeth (No. 11, 22, and 23) was used for this <i>in vitro</i> study. An intraoral scan was performed on the model, with the resulting digital impression exported as a stereolithography file. Next, a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was performed, with the resulting image exported as a Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine file. Both files were imported into the RealGUIDE 5.0 dental implant planning software. Active Bio implants were selected to place into the model. A single stereolithographic 3-dimensional surgical guide was printed for all cases. Ten clinicians, divided into 2 groups, placed a total of 60 implants in 20 acrylic resin maxillary models. Due to the small sample size, the Mann-Whitney test was used to analyze mean values in the 2 groups. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The accuracy of implant placement using a surgical guide was significantly higher than that of free-hand implantation. The mean difference between the planned and actual implant positions at the apex was 0.68 mm for the experienced group using the free-hand technique and 0.14 mm for the non-experienced group using the surgical guide technique (<i>P</i>=0.019). At the top of the implant, the mean difference was 1.04 mm for the experienced group using the free-hand technique and 0.52 mm for the non-experienced group using the surgical guide technique (<i>P</i>=0.044).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The data from this study will provide valuable insights for future studies, since <i>in vitro</i> studies should be conducted extensively in advance of retrospective or prospective studies to avoid burdening patients unnecessarily.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"388-401\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627737/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2204700235\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2204700235","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本研究调查了由经验丰富的操作员进行的徒手种植体手术与由经验不足的操作员在上颌前牙模型弓上进行的静态引导种植体手术的准确性。方法:采用缺失牙齿的上颌牙模型(编号11、22和23)进行体外研究。对模型进行口内扫描,得到的数字印模作为立体光刻文件导出。接下来,进行锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT),将得到的图像导出为医学中的数字成像和通信文件。这两个文件都导入了RealGUIDE 5.0牙科植入计划软件。选择活性生物植入物放置在模型中。所有病例均打印了一份立体光刻三维手术指南。10名临床医生,分为2组,在20个丙烯酸树脂上颌模型中放置了总共60个植入物。由于样本量较小,使用Mann-Whitney检验来分析两组的平均值。使用SAS版本9.4.进行统计分析。结果:使用手术引导器放置植入物的准确性显著高于徒手植入。对于使用徒手技术的有经验的组和使用手术引导技术的无经验的组,在顶点处的计划植入位置和实际植入位置之间的平均差分别为0.68mm和0.14mm(P=0.019),使用徒手技术的有经验组和使用手术引导技术的无经验组的平均差异分别为1.04mm和0.52mm(P=0.044)。结论:本研究的数据将为未来的研究提供有价值的见解,因为体外研究应该在回顾性或前瞻性研究之前广泛进行,以避免给患者带来不必要的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of accuracy between free-hand and surgical guide implant placement among experienced and non-experienced dental implant practitioners: an <i>in vitro</i> study.

Comparison of accuracy between free-hand and surgical guide implant placement among experienced and non-experienced dental implant practitioners: an <i>in vitro</i> study.

Comparison of accuracy between free-hand and surgical guide implant placement among experienced and non-experienced dental implant practitioners: an <i>in vitro</i> study.

Comparison of accuracy between free-hand and surgical guide implant placement among experienced and non-experienced dental implant practitioners: an in vitro study.

Purpose: This study investigated the accuracy of free-hand implant surgery performed by an experienced operator compared to static guided implant surgery performed by an inexperienced operator on an anterior maxillary dental model arch.

Methods: A maxillary dental model with missing teeth (No. 11, 22, and 23) was used for this in vitro study. An intraoral scan was performed on the model, with the resulting digital impression exported as a stereolithography file. Next, a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was performed, with the resulting image exported as a Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine file. Both files were imported into the RealGUIDE 5.0 dental implant planning software. Active Bio implants were selected to place into the model. A single stereolithographic 3-dimensional surgical guide was printed for all cases. Ten clinicians, divided into 2 groups, placed a total of 60 implants in 20 acrylic resin maxillary models. Due to the small sample size, the Mann-Whitney test was used to analyze mean values in the 2 groups. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4.

Results: The accuracy of implant placement using a surgical guide was significantly higher than that of free-hand implantation. The mean difference between the planned and actual implant positions at the apex was 0.68 mm for the experienced group using the free-hand technique and 0.14 mm for the non-experienced group using the surgical guide technique (P=0.019). At the top of the implant, the mean difference was 1.04 mm for the experienced group using the free-hand technique and 0.52 mm for the non-experienced group using the surgical guide technique (P=0.044).

Conclusions: The data from this study will provide valuable insights for future studies, since in vitro studies should be conducted extensively in advance of retrospective or prospective studies to avoid burdening patients unnecessarily.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science (JPIS) is a peer-reviewed and open-access journal providing up-to-date information relevant to professionalism of periodontology and dental implantology. JPIS is dedicated to global and extensive publication which includes evidence-based original articles, and fundamental reviews in order to cover a variety of interests in the field of periodontal as well as implant science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信