专家共识小组建议选择最佳的声门上气道设备纳入医生的急救袋。

Steven G Schauer, Ashley D Tapia, E Ann Jeschke, Jessica Mendez, Danielius J Zilevicius, Carlos Bedolla, Robert T Gerhardt, Romeo Fairley, Peter J Stednick, Hunter P Black, Austin S Langdon, William T Davis, Robert A De Lorenzo, Michael D April
{"title":"专家共识小组建议选择最佳的声门上气道设备纳入医生的急救袋。","authors":"Steven G Schauer,&nbsp;Ashley D Tapia,&nbsp;E Ann Jeschke,&nbsp;Jessica Mendez,&nbsp;Danielius J Zilevicius,&nbsp;Carlos Bedolla,&nbsp;Robert T Gerhardt,&nbsp;Romeo Fairley,&nbsp;Peter J Stednick,&nbsp;Hunter P Black,&nbsp;Austin S Langdon,&nbsp;William T Davis,&nbsp;Robert A De Lorenzo,&nbsp;Michael D April","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Airway obstruction is the second leading cause of potentially survivable death on the battlefield. The Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care (CoTCCC) has evolving recommendations for the optimal supraglottic airway (SGA) device for inclusion to the medics' aid bag.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We convened an expert consensus panel consisting of a mix of 8 prehospital specialists, emergency medicine experts, and experienced combat medics, with the intent to offer recommendations for optimal SGA selection. Prior to meeting, we independently reviewed previously published studies conducted by our study team, conducted a virtual meeting, and summarized the findings to the panel. The studies included an analysis of end-user after action reviews, a market analysis, engineering testing, and prospective feedback from combat medics. The panel members then made recommendations regarding their top 3 choices of devices including the options of military custom design. Simple descriptive statistics were used to analyze panel recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The preponderance (7/8, 88%) of panel members recommended the gel-cuffed SGA, followed by the self-inflating-cuff SGA (5/8, 62%) and laryngeal tube SGA (5/8, 62%). Panel members expressed concerns primarily related to the (1) devices' tolerance for the military environment, and (2) ability to effectively secure the gel-cuffed SGA and the self-inflating-cuff SGA during transport.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A preponderance of panel members selected the gel-cuff SGA with substantial feedback highlighting the need for military-specific customizations to support the combat environment needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":74148,"journal":{"name":"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expert Consensus Panel Recommendations for Selection of the Optimal Supraglottic Airway Device for Inclusion to the Medic's Aid Bag.\",\"authors\":\"Steven G Schauer,&nbsp;Ashley D Tapia,&nbsp;E Ann Jeschke,&nbsp;Jessica Mendez,&nbsp;Danielius J Zilevicius,&nbsp;Carlos Bedolla,&nbsp;Robert T Gerhardt,&nbsp;Romeo Fairley,&nbsp;Peter J Stednick,&nbsp;Hunter P Black,&nbsp;Austin S Langdon,&nbsp;William T Davis,&nbsp;Robert A De Lorenzo,&nbsp;Michael D April\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Airway obstruction is the second leading cause of potentially survivable death on the battlefield. The Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care (CoTCCC) has evolving recommendations for the optimal supraglottic airway (SGA) device for inclusion to the medics' aid bag.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We convened an expert consensus panel consisting of a mix of 8 prehospital specialists, emergency medicine experts, and experienced combat medics, with the intent to offer recommendations for optimal SGA selection. Prior to meeting, we independently reviewed previously published studies conducted by our study team, conducted a virtual meeting, and summarized the findings to the panel. The studies included an analysis of end-user after action reviews, a market analysis, engineering testing, and prospective feedback from combat medics. The panel members then made recommendations regarding their top 3 choices of devices including the options of military custom design. Simple descriptive statistics were used to analyze panel recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The preponderance (7/8, 88%) of panel members recommended the gel-cuffed SGA, followed by the self-inflating-cuff SGA (5/8, 62%) and laryngeal tube SGA (5/8, 62%). Panel members expressed concerns primarily related to the (1) devices' tolerance for the military environment, and (2) ability to effectively secure the gel-cuffed SGA and the self-inflating-cuff SGA during transport.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A preponderance of panel members selected the gel-cuff SGA with substantial feedback highlighting the need for military-specific customizations to support the combat environment needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:气道阻塞是战场上潜在的第二大死亡原因。战术战斗伤亡护理委员会(CoTCCC)对最佳声门上气道(SGA)装置提出了不断发展的建议,以纳入医务人员的急救包。方法:我们召集了一个由8名院前专家、急诊医学专家和经验丰富的战斗医务人员组成的专家共识小组,旨在为最佳SGA选择提供建议。在会议之前,我们独立审查了我们研究小组先前发表的研究,进行了一次虚拟会议,并向专家组总结了研究结果。这些研究包括对行动回顾后的最终用户分析、市场分析、工程测试和来自战斗医务人员的预期反馈。然后,小组成员就他们最喜欢的3种设备提出了建议,其中包括军用定制设计的选项。使用简单的描述性统计来分析小组的建议。结果:专家组成员推荐凝胶袖套式SGA的优势(7/ 8,88%),其次是自充气袖套式SGA(5/ 8,62%)和喉管式SGA(5/ 8,62%)。小组成员表达了主要关注的问题,主要涉及(1)设备对军事环境的耐受性,以及(2)在运输过程中有效保护凝胶袖口SGA和自充气袖口SGA的能力。结论:专家组成员的优势选择了凝胶袖带SGA,并得到了大量反馈,强调了军事特定定制的需求,以支持战斗环境的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Expert Consensus Panel Recommendations for Selection of the Optimal Supraglottic Airway Device for Inclusion to the Medic's Aid Bag.

Introduction: Airway obstruction is the second leading cause of potentially survivable death on the battlefield. The Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care (CoTCCC) has evolving recommendations for the optimal supraglottic airway (SGA) device for inclusion to the medics' aid bag.

Methods: We convened an expert consensus panel consisting of a mix of 8 prehospital specialists, emergency medicine experts, and experienced combat medics, with the intent to offer recommendations for optimal SGA selection. Prior to meeting, we independently reviewed previously published studies conducted by our study team, conducted a virtual meeting, and summarized the findings to the panel. The studies included an analysis of end-user after action reviews, a market analysis, engineering testing, and prospective feedback from combat medics. The panel members then made recommendations regarding their top 3 choices of devices including the options of military custom design. Simple descriptive statistics were used to analyze panel recommendations.

Results: The preponderance (7/8, 88%) of panel members recommended the gel-cuffed SGA, followed by the self-inflating-cuff SGA (5/8, 62%) and laryngeal tube SGA (5/8, 62%). Panel members expressed concerns primarily related to the (1) devices' tolerance for the military environment, and (2) ability to effectively secure the gel-cuffed SGA and the self-inflating-cuff SGA during transport.

Conclusions: A preponderance of panel members selected the gel-cuff SGA with substantial feedback highlighting the need for military-specific customizations to support the combat environment needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信