{"title":"超声在植入式医疗器械通信中能做什么和不能做什么","authors":"Banafsaj Jaafar;Jeff Neasham;Patrick Degenaar","doi":"10.1109/RBME.2021.3080087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern Active Medical Implantable Devices require communications to transmit information to the outside world or other implantable sub-systems. This can include physiological data, diagnostics, and parameters to optimise the therapeutic protocol. The available options are to use optical, radiofrequency, or ultrasonic communications. However, in all cases, transmission becomes more difficult with deeper transmission through tissue. Challenges include absorption and scattering by tissue, and the need to ensure there are no undesirable heating effects. As such, this paper aims to review research progress in using ultrasound as an alternative for deep tissue communications. We provide an empirical review of the technology and communication protocols that different groups have used, as well as comparing the implications in terms of penetration depth, implant size, and data rate. We conclude that this technique has promise for deeper implants and for intrabody communications between implantable devices (intrabody networks).","PeriodicalId":39235,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"16 ","pages":"357-370"},"PeriodicalIF":17.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/RBME.2021.3080087","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Ultrasound Can and Cannot Do in Implantable Medical Device Communications\",\"authors\":\"Banafsaj Jaafar;Jeff Neasham;Patrick Degenaar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RBME.2021.3080087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Modern Active Medical Implantable Devices require communications to transmit information to the outside world or other implantable sub-systems. This can include physiological data, diagnostics, and parameters to optimise the therapeutic protocol. The available options are to use optical, radiofrequency, or ultrasonic communications. However, in all cases, transmission becomes more difficult with deeper transmission through tissue. Challenges include absorption and scattering by tissue, and the need to ensure there are no undesirable heating effects. As such, this paper aims to review research progress in using ultrasound as an alternative for deep tissue communications. We provide an empirical review of the technology and communication protocols that different groups have used, as well as comparing the implications in terms of penetration depth, implant size, and data rate. We conclude that this technique has promise for deeper implants and for intrabody communications between implantable devices (intrabody networks).\",\"PeriodicalId\":39235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"357-370\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":17.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/RBME.2021.3080087\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9430704/\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9430704/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
What Ultrasound Can and Cannot Do in Implantable Medical Device Communications
Modern Active Medical Implantable Devices require communications to transmit information to the outside world or other implantable sub-systems. This can include physiological data, diagnostics, and parameters to optimise the therapeutic protocol. The available options are to use optical, radiofrequency, or ultrasonic communications. However, in all cases, transmission becomes more difficult with deeper transmission through tissue. Challenges include absorption and scattering by tissue, and the need to ensure there are no undesirable heating effects. As such, this paper aims to review research progress in using ultrasound as an alternative for deep tissue communications. We provide an empirical review of the technology and communication protocols that different groups have used, as well as comparing the implications in terms of penetration depth, implant size, and data rate. We conclude that this technique has promise for deeper implants and for intrabody communications between implantable devices (intrabody networks).
期刊介绍:
IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering (RBME) serves as a platform to review the state-of-the-art and trends in the interdisciplinary field of biomedical engineering, which encompasses engineering, life sciences, and medicine. The journal aims to consolidate research and reviews for members of all IEEE societies interested in biomedical engineering. Recognizing the demand for comprehensive reviews among authors of various IEEE journals, RBME addresses this need by receiving, reviewing, and publishing scholarly works under one umbrella. It covers a broad spectrum, from historical to modern developments in biomedical engineering and the integration of technologies from various IEEE societies into the life sciences and medicine.