{"title":"带音中元音修饰策略的声学理论","authors":"Christian T. Herbst , Brad H. Story , David Meyer","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Various authors have argued that belting is to be produced by “speech-like” sounds, with the first and second supraglottic vocal tract resonances (<span><math><msub><mi>f</mi><mrow><mi>R</mi><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mi>f</mi><mrow><mi>R</mi><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>) at frequencies of the vowels determined by the lyrics to be sung. Acoustically, the hallmark of belting has been identified as a dominant second harmonic, possibly enhanced by first resonance tuning (<span><math><mrow><msub><mi>f</mi><mrow><mi>R</mi><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>≈</mo><mn>2</mn><msub><mi>f</mi><mi>o</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>). It is not clear how both these concepts – (a) phonating with “speech-like,” unmodified vowels; and (b) producing a belting sound with a dominant second harmonic, typically enhanced by <span><math><msub><mi>f</mi><mrow><mi>R</mi><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> – can be upheld when singing across a singer’s entire musical pitch range. For instance, anecdotal reports from pedagogues suggest that vowels with a low <span><math><msub><mi>f</mi><mrow><mi>R</mi><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>, such as [i] or [u], might have to be modified considerably (by raising <span><math><msub><mi>f</mi><mrow><mi>R</mi><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>) in order to phonate at higher pitches. These issues were systematically addressed <em>in silico</em> with respect to treble singing, using a linear source-filter voice production model. The dominant harmonic of the radiated spectrum was assessed in 12987 simulations, covering a parameter space of 37 fundamental frequencies (<span><math><msub><mi>f</mi><mi>o</mi></msub></math></span><span>) across the musical pitch range from C3 to C6; 27 voice source spectral slope settings from </span><span><math><mo>−</mo></math></span>4 to <span><math><mo>−</mo></math></span><span>30 dB/octave; computed for 13 different IPA vowels. The results suggest that, for most unmodified vowels, the stereotypical belting sound characteristics with a dominant second harmonic can only be produced over a pitch range of about a musical fifth, centered at </span><span><math><mrow><msub><mi>f</mi><mi>o</mi></msub><mo>≈</mo><mn>0.5</mn><msub><mi>f</mi><mrow><mi>R</mi><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span>. In the [ɔ] and [ɑ] vowels, that range is extended to an octave, supported by a low second resonance. Data aggregation – considering the relative prevalence of vowels in American English – suggests that, historically, belting with <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>f</mi><mrow><mi>R</mi><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>≈</mo><mn>2</mn><msub><mi>f</mi><mi>o</mi></msub></mrow></math></span> was derived from speech, and that songs with an extended musical pitch range likely demand considerable vowel modification. We thus argue that – on acoustical grounds – the pedagogical commandment for belting with unmodified, “speech-like” vowels can not always be fulfilled.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":"39 5","pages":"Pages 1192-1204"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acoustical Theory of Vowel Modification Strategies in Belting\",\"authors\":\"Christian T. Herbst , Brad H. Story , David Meyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.01.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Various authors have argued that belting is to be produced by “speech-like” sounds, with the first and second supraglottic vocal tract resonances (<span><math><msub><mi>f</mi><mrow><mi>R</mi><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mi>f</mi><mrow><mi>R</mi><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>) at frequencies of the vowels determined by the lyrics to be sung. Acoustically, the hallmark of belting has been identified as a dominant second harmonic, possibly enhanced by first resonance tuning (<span><math><mrow><msub><mi>f</mi><mrow><mi>R</mi><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>≈</mo><mn>2</mn><msub><mi>f</mi><mi>o</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>). It is not clear how both these concepts – (a) phonating with “speech-like,” unmodified vowels; and (b) producing a belting sound with a dominant second harmonic, typically enhanced by <span><math><msub><mi>f</mi><mrow><mi>R</mi><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> – can be upheld when singing across a singer’s entire musical pitch range. For instance, anecdotal reports from pedagogues suggest that vowels with a low <span><math><msub><mi>f</mi><mrow><mi>R</mi><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>, such as [i] or [u], might have to be modified considerably (by raising <span><math><msub><mi>f</mi><mrow><mi>R</mi><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>) in order to phonate at higher pitches. These issues were systematically addressed <em>in silico</em> with respect to treble singing, using a linear source-filter voice production model. The dominant harmonic of the radiated spectrum was assessed in 12987 simulations, covering a parameter space of 37 fundamental frequencies (<span><math><msub><mi>f</mi><mi>o</mi></msub></math></span><span>) across the musical pitch range from C3 to C6; 27 voice source spectral slope settings from </span><span><math><mo>−</mo></math></span>4 to <span><math><mo>−</mo></math></span><span>30 dB/octave; computed for 13 different IPA vowels. The results suggest that, for most unmodified vowels, the stereotypical belting sound characteristics with a dominant second harmonic can only be produced over a pitch range of about a musical fifth, centered at </span><span><math><mrow><msub><mi>f</mi><mi>o</mi></msub><mo>≈</mo><mn>0.5</mn><msub><mi>f</mi><mrow><mi>R</mi><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span>. In the [ɔ] and [ɑ] vowels, that range is extended to an octave, supported by a low second resonance. Data aggregation – considering the relative prevalence of vowels in American English – suggests that, historically, belting with <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>f</mi><mrow><mi>R</mi><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mo>≈</mo><mn>2</mn><msub><mi>f</mi><mi>o</mi></msub></mrow></math></span> was derived from speech, and that songs with an extended musical pitch range likely demand considerable vowel modification. We thus argue that – on acoustical grounds – the pedagogical commandment for belting with unmodified, “speech-like” vowels can not always be fulfilled.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"volume\":\"39 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1192-1204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0892199723000048\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0892199723000048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Acoustical Theory of Vowel Modification Strategies in Belting
Various authors have argued that belting is to be produced by “speech-like” sounds, with the first and second supraglottic vocal tract resonances ( and ) at frequencies of the vowels determined by the lyrics to be sung. Acoustically, the hallmark of belting has been identified as a dominant second harmonic, possibly enhanced by first resonance tuning (). It is not clear how both these concepts – (a) phonating with “speech-like,” unmodified vowels; and (b) producing a belting sound with a dominant second harmonic, typically enhanced by – can be upheld when singing across a singer’s entire musical pitch range. For instance, anecdotal reports from pedagogues suggest that vowels with a low , such as [i] or [u], might have to be modified considerably (by raising ) in order to phonate at higher pitches. These issues were systematically addressed in silico with respect to treble singing, using a linear source-filter voice production model. The dominant harmonic of the radiated spectrum was assessed in 12987 simulations, covering a parameter space of 37 fundamental frequencies () across the musical pitch range from C3 to C6; 27 voice source spectral slope settings from 4 to 30 dB/octave; computed for 13 different IPA vowels. The results suggest that, for most unmodified vowels, the stereotypical belting sound characteristics with a dominant second harmonic can only be produced over a pitch range of about a musical fifth, centered at . In the [ɔ] and [ɑ] vowels, that range is extended to an octave, supported by a low second resonance. Data aggregation – considering the relative prevalence of vowels in American English – suggests that, historically, belting with was derived from speech, and that songs with an extended musical pitch range likely demand considerable vowel modification. We thus argue that – on acoustical grounds – the pedagogical commandment for belting with unmodified, “speech-like” vowels can not always be fulfilled.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.