手动淋巴引流和压迫包扎治疗2期乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的效果:一项随机对照试验。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Lymphatic research and biology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-04 DOI:10.1089/lrb.2022.0074
Ying Liu, Xiaoyi Zhao, Jian Song, Wowa Zhao, Ying Ge, Jinghong Guan
{"title":"手动淋巴引流和压迫包扎治疗2期乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的效果:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Ying Liu,&nbsp;Xiaoyi Zhao,&nbsp;Jian Song,&nbsp;Wowa Zhao,&nbsp;Ying Ge,&nbsp;Jinghong Guan","doi":"10.1089/lrb.2022.0074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Aim:</i></b> To explore the effect of manual lymph drainage (MLD), compression bandaging (CB), or combined decongestive therapy (CDT), including MLD and CB, on stage 2 breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Sixty women with stage 2 BCRL were enrolled. They were randomly divided into the MLD group, the CB group or the CDT group. Each group, respectively, received MLD alone, CB alone, or CDT composed of MLD and CB, for 2 weeks. The volume and the local tissue water (LTW) of affected arms were measured before and after treatment. Arm circumferences were measured at 4 cm interval starting from the wrist to the shoulder with a tape measure. LTW was detected using the (tissue dielectric constant, TDC) method and was expressed as TDC value in two sites on the ventral midpoint of upper arm and forearm. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The volume of affected arms in each group after 2-weeks' treatment was lower than their baseline and the difference was statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05). But there was no significant difference in volume change among three groups. The TDC value of the upper arm and forearm in the group CB and the group CDT decreased distinctly compared with baseline (<i>p</i> < 0.05). But the TDC value of the upper arm and forearm after MLD did not change (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Compared with the group MLD and the group CDT, the reduction of the TDC value in the group CB was more significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> MLD or CB alone could effectively reduce the volume of affected arms for patients with stage 2 BCRL, and CB also could reduce the LTW more significantly. CDT did not seem to show an extra advantage. Therefore, CB may be the first choice for stage 2 BCRL. But for patients who are unwilling or intolerant to CB, MLD can be selected.</p>","PeriodicalId":18168,"journal":{"name":"Lymphatic research and biology","volume":" ","pages":"479-484"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Manual Lymph Drainage and Compression Bandaging for Stage 2 Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ying Liu,&nbsp;Xiaoyi Zhao,&nbsp;Jian Song,&nbsp;Wowa Zhao,&nbsp;Ying Ge,&nbsp;Jinghong Guan\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/lrb.2022.0074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Aim:</i></b> To explore the effect of manual lymph drainage (MLD), compression bandaging (CB), or combined decongestive therapy (CDT), including MLD and CB, on stage 2 breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Sixty women with stage 2 BCRL were enrolled. They were randomly divided into the MLD group, the CB group or the CDT group. Each group, respectively, received MLD alone, CB alone, or CDT composed of MLD and CB, for 2 weeks. The volume and the local tissue water (LTW) of affected arms were measured before and after treatment. Arm circumferences were measured at 4 cm interval starting from the wrist to the shoulder with a tape measure. LTW was detected using the (tissue dielectric constant, TDC) method and was expressed as TDC value in two sites on the ventral midpoint of upper arm and forearm. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The volume of affected arms in each group after 2-weeks' treatment was lower than their baseline and the difference was statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05). But there was no significant difference in volume change among three groups. The TDC value of the upper arm and forearm in the group CB and the group CDT decreased distinctly compared with baseline (<i>p</i> < 0.05). But the TDC value of the upper arm and forearm after MLD did not change (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Compared with the group MLD and the group CDT, the reduction of the TDC value in the group CB was more significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> MLD or CB alone could effectively reduce the volume of affected arms for patients with stage 2 BCRL, and CB also could reduce the LTW more significantly. CDT did not seem to show an extra advantage. Therefore, CB may be the first choice for stage 2 BCRL. But for patients who are unwilling or intolerant to CB, MLD can be selected.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lymphatic research and biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"479-484\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lymphatic research and biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2022.0074\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lymphatic research and biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2022.0074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨手动淋巴引流(MLD)、压迫包扎(CB)或联合缓解充血疗法(CDT)(包括MLD和CB)对2期乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)的影响。方法:60名患有2期BCRL的女性被纳入研究。他们被随机分为MLD组、CB组或CDT组。每组分别接受单独的MLD、单独的CB或由MLD和CB组成的CDT,为期2周。在治疗前后测量患臂的体积和局部组织水(LTW)。臂周测量值为4 用卷尺测量从手腕到肩膀的厘米间距。LTW使用(组织介电常数,TDC)方法检测,并表示为上臂和前臂腹侧中点上两个位置的TDC值。结果:治疗2周后各组患臂体积均低于基线,差异有统计学意义(p p p > 与MLD组和CDT组相比,CB组TDC值的降低更为显著(p 结论:对于2期BCRL患者,单独使用MLD或CB可以有效地减少患臂的体积,CB也可以更显著地减少LTW。CDT似乎没有显示出额外的优势。因此,CB可能是第2阶段BCRL的首选。但对于不愿意或不耐受CB的患者,可以选择MLD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Manual Lymph Drainage and Compression Bandaging for Stage 2 Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Aim: To explore the effect of manual lymph drainage (MLD), compression bandaging (CB), or combined decongestive therapy (CDT), including MLD and CB, on stage 2 breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Methods: Sixty women with stage 2 BCRL were enrolled. They were randomly divided into the MLD group, the CB group or the CDT group. Each group, respectively, received MLD alone, CB alone, or CDT composed of MLD and CB, for 2 weeks. The volume and the local tissue water (LTW) of affected arms were measured before and after treatment. Arm circumferences were measured at 4 cm interval starting from the wrist to the shoulder with a tape measure. LTW was detected using the (tissue dielectric constant, TDC) method and was expressed as TDC value in two sites on the ventral midpoint of upper arm and forearm. Results: The volume of affected arms in each group after 2-weeks' treatment was lower than their baseline and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). But there was no significant difference in volume change among three groups. The TDC value of the upper arm and forearm in the group CB and the group CDT decreased distinctly compared with baseline (p < 0.05). But the TDC value of the upper arm and forearm after MLD did not change (p > 0.05). Compared with the group MLD and the group CDT, the reduction of the TDC value in the group CB was more significant (p < 0.05). Conclusions: MLD or CB alone could effectively reduce the volume of affected arms for patients with stage 2 BCRL, and CB also could reduce the LTW more significantly. CDT did not seem to show an extra advantage. Therefore, CB may be the first choice for stage 2 BCRL. But for patients who are unwilling or intolerant to CB, MLD can be selected.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lymphatic research and biology
Lymphatic research and biology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Lymphatic Research and Biology delivers the most current peer-reviewed advances and developments in lymphatic biology and pathology from the world’s leading biomedical investigators. The Journal provides original research from a broad range of investigative disciplines, including genetics, biochemistry and biophysics, cellular and molecular biology, physiology and pharmacology, anatomy, developmental biology, and pathology. Lymphatic Research and Biology coverage includes: -Vasculogenesis and angiogenesis -Genetics of lymphatic disorders -Human lymphatic disease, including lymphatic insufficiency and associated vascular anomalies -Physiology of intestinal fluid and protein balance -Immunosurveillance and immune cell trafficking -Tumor biology and metastasis -Pharmacology -Lymphatic imaging -Endothelial and smooth muscle cell biology -Inflammation, infection, and autoimmune disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信