Abdulrahman Aldarrab, Wael Alsakran, Samar A Al-Swailem, Sami A Al-Shahwan
{"title":"穿透性角膜移植术与角膜剥离自动内皮角膜移植术治疗假性大疱性角膜病变后青光眼治疗升级的比较:一项队列研究。","authors":"Abdulrahman Aldarrab, Wael Alsakran, Samar A Al-Swailem, Sami A Al-Shahwan","doi":"10.4103/meajo.meajo_21_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare glaucoma therapy escalation (GTE), graft survival, vision, and glaucoma following penetrating keratoplasty (PK group) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK group) to treat pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort included cases of PBK managed with PK from 2009 to 2014. We compared the incidences and determinants of GTE, graft survival, and visual disability. <i>P</i> < 0.05 was statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 58 eyes in the PK group and 117 eyes in the DSAEK group. The incidence of GTE in the PK and DSAEK groups at the last follow-up was 34.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.5-48.9) and 46.6% (95% CI: 27.7-65.4), respectively. The risk of GTE was similar between the groups (relative risk [RR] = 1.36 [95% CI: 0.94-1.98], <i>P</i> = 0.12). GTE was significantly associated with graft survival in the PK group (RR = 3.25 [95% CI: 1.5-7.0], <i>P</i> < 0.001) and the DSAEK group (RR = 3.77 [95% CI: 2.6-5.6], <i>P</i> < 0.001). Glaucoma (<i>P</i> = 0.001) and previous keratoplasty (<i>P</i> < 0.001) were significant predictors for GTE. At the final follow-up visit, severe visual disability was not significantly different between the groups (RR = 0.9 [95% CI: 0.3-2.9], <i>P</i> = 0.88). There was a statistically significant improvement in vision after DSAEK (<i>P</i> < 0.001) but not after PK (<i>P</i> = 0.67).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GTE was similar in eyes with PBK managed by PK or DSAEK. Glaucoma and previous keratoplasty were predictors of GTE post-keratoplasty. DSAEK gave better visual outcomes than PK for managing PBK.</p>","PeriodicalId":18740,"journal":{"name":"Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10138129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Glaucoma Therapy Escalation After Penetrating Keratoplasty to Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty for the Treatment of Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy: A Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Abdulrahman Aldarrab, Wael Alsakran, Samar A Al-Swailem, Sami A Al-Shahwan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/meajo.meajo_21_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare glaucoma therapy escalation (GTE), graft survival, vision, and glaucoma following penetrating keratoplasty (PK group) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK group) to treat pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort included cases of PBK managed with PK from 2009 to 2014. We compared the incidences and determinants of GTE, graft survival, and visual disability. <i>P</i> < 0.05 was statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 58 eyes in the PK group and 117 eyes in the DSAEK group. The incidence of GTE in the PK and DSAEK groups at the last follow-up was 34.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.5-48.9) and 46.6% (95% CI: 27.7-65.4), respectively. The risk of GTE was similar between the groups (relative risk [RR] = 1.36 [95% CI: 0.94-1.98], <i>P</i> = 0.12). GTE was significantly associated with graft survival in the PK group (RR = 3.25 [95% CI: 1.5-7.0], <i>P</i> < 0.001) and the DSAEK group (RR = 3.77 [95% CI: 2.6-5.6], <i>P</i> < 0.001). Glaucoma (<i>P</i> = 0.001) and previous keratoplasty (<i>P</i> < 0.001) were significant predictors for GTE. At the final follow-up visit, severe visual disability was not significantly different between the groups (RR = 0.9 [95% CI: 0.3-2.9], <i>P</i> = 0.88). There was a statistically significant improvement in vision after DSAEK (<i>P</i> < 0.001) but not after PK (<i>P</i> = 0.67).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GTE was similar in eyes with PBK managed by PK or DSAEK. Glaucoma and previous keratoplasty were predictors of GTE post-keratoplasty. DSAEK gave better visual outcomes than PK for managing PBK.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10138129/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/meajo.meajo_21_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/meajo.meajo_21_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Glaucoma Therapy Escalation After Penetrating Keratoplasty to Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty for the Treatment of Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy: A Cohort Study.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare glaucoma therapy escalation (GTE), graft survival, vision, and glaucoma following penetrating keratoplasty (PK group) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK group) to treat pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK).
Methods: This cohort included cases of PBK managed with PK from 2009 to 2014. We compared the incidences and determinants of GTE, graft survival, and visual disability. P < 0.05 was statistically significant.
Results: There were 58 eyes in the PK group and 117 eyes in the DSAEK group. The incidence of GTE in the PK and DSAEK groups at the last follow-up was 34.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.5-48.9) and 46.6% (95% CI: 27.7-65.4), respectively. The risk of GTE was similar between the groups (relative risk [RR] = 1.36 [95% CI: 0.94-1.98], P = 0.12). GTE was significantly associated with graft survival in the PK group (RR = 3.25 [95% CI: 1.5-7.0], P < 0.001) and the DSAEK group (RR = 3.77 [95% CI: 2.6-5.6], P < 0.001). Glaucoma (P = 0.001) and previous keratoplasty (P < 0.001) were significant predictors for GTE. At the final follow-up visit, severe visual disability was not significantly different between the groups (RR = 0.9 [95% CI: 0.3-2.9], P = 0.88). There was a statistically significant improvement in vision after DSAEK (P < 0.001) but not after PK (P = 0.67).
Conclusion: GTE was similar in eyes with PBK managed by PK or DSAEK. Glaucoma and previous keratoplasty were predictors of GTE post-keratoplasty. DSAEK gave better visual outcomes than PK for managing PBK.
期刊介绍：
The Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology (MEAJO), published four times per year in print and online, is an official journal of the Middle East African Council of Ophthalmology (MEACO). It is an international, peer-reviewed journal whose mission includes publication of original research of interest to ophthalmologists in the Middle East and Africa, and to provide readers with high quality educational review articles from world-renown experts. MEAJO, previously known as Middle East Journal of Ophthalmology (MEJO) was founded by Dr Akef El Maghraby in 1993.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
