提高学校流行病学调查参与战略的有效性:快速审查。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
T A Dyer, A-M Glenny, L MacDonald, Z Marshman, K Jones
{"title":"提高学校流行病学调查参与战略的有效性:快速审查。","authors":"T A Dyer,&nbsp;A-M Glenny,&nbsp;L MacDonald,&nbsp;Z Marshman,&nbsp;K Jones","doi":"10.1922/CDH_00242Dyer07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Rapid review of the literature on strategies to increase participation rates in school-based epidemiological surveys.</p><p><strong>Basic research design: </strong>Rapid review. MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for articles written in English from 2000 onwards. Synthesised evidence and primary research were included as data sources from peer reviewed journals and reports.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Any strategy aiming to increase participation in school-based health surveys. The comparator was usual procedure or an alternative strategy to increase participation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcomes included participation and consent rates. Secondary outcomes were feasibility, acceptability and adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 591 unique records, of which 587 were excluded. Four studies were suitable for inclusion, including one systematic review, one randomised controlled trial, one cross-sectional study and one retrospective analysis. Based on very low certainty evidence, recommendations for maximising participation rates in one systematic review of US studies included: promoting the survey to school staff, parents and students; disseminating study information using direct rather than mediated methods; offering incentives to schools, staff and participants; following up non-responders; and employing a research team member to co-ordinate and monitor recruitment. However, UK studies found that different strategies did not increase participation more than that achieved by a standard approach (delivery of covering letter/consent forms via the child with no follow-up of non-responders).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the lack of evidence of effectiveness of alternative strategies in the UK, additional measures beyond existing standard approaches for active consent cannot be recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":10647,"journal":{"name":"Community dental health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of strategies to increase participation in school-based epidemiological surveys: a rapid review.\",\"authors\":\"T A Dyer,&nbsp;A-M Glenny,&nbsp;L MacDonald,&nbsp;Z Marshman,&nbsp;K Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1922/CDH_00242Dyer07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Rapid review of the literature on strategies to increase participation rates in school-based epidemiological surveys.</p><p><strong>Basic research design: </strong>Rapid review. MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for articles written in English from 2000 onwards. Synthesised evidence and primary research were included as data sources from peer reviewed journals and reports.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Any strategy aiming to increase participation in school-based health surveys. The comparator was usual procedure or an alternative strategy to increase participation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcomes included participation and consent rates. Secondary outcomes were feasibility, acceptability and adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 591 unique records, of which 587 were excluded. Four studies were suitable for inclusion, including one systematic review, one randomised controlled trial, one cross-sectional study and one retrospective analysis. Based on very low certainty evidence, recommendations for maximising participation rates in one systematic review of US studies included: promoting the survey to school staff, parents and students; disseminating study information using direct rather than mediated methods; offering incentives to schools, staff and participants; following up non-responders; and employing a research team member to co-ordinate and monitor recruitment. However, UK studies found that different strategies did not increase participation more than that achieved by a standard approach (delivery of covering letter/consent forms via the child with no follow-up of non-responders).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the lack of evidence of effectiveness of alternative strategies in the UK, additional measures beyond existing standard approaches for active consent cannot be recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community dental health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community dental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1922/CDH_00242Dyer07\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community dental health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/CDH_00242Dyer07","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:快速回顾提高学校流行病学调查参与率的相关文献。基础研究设计:快速审查。在MEDLINE和Embase数据库中检索了自2000年以来用英语撰写的文章。综合证据和初步研究被纳入同行评议期刊和报告的数据来源。干预措施:旨在提高学校健康调查参与率的任何战略。比较国是增加参与的通常程序或备选战略。主要结果测量:主要结果包括参与率和同意率。次要结局为可行性、可接受性和不良反应。结果:检索到591条唯一记录,其中587条被排除。4项研究适合纳入,包括1项系统综述、1项随机对照试验、1项横断面研究和1项回顾性分析。基于非常低确定性的证据,在一项对美国研究的系统回顾中,关于最大限度提高参与率的建议包括:向学校员工、家长和学生推广调查;使用直接而非中介的方法传播研究信息;向学校、教职员和参加者提供奖励;跟进无反应者;并雇用一名研究小组成员来协调和监督招聘。然而,英国的研究发现,不同的策略并没有比标准方法(通过孩子发送求职信/同意表格,没有对无反应者进行跟踪)更能提高参与程度。结论:鉴于在英国缺乏替代策略有效性的证据,除了现有的主动同意标准方法之外,不能推荐额外的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of strategies to increase participation in school-based epidemiological surveys: a rapid review.

Objective: Rapid review of the literature on strategies to increase participation rates in school-based epidemiological surveys.

Basic research design: Rapid review. MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for articles written in English from 2000 onwards. Synthesised evidence and primary research were included as data sources from peer reviewed journals and reports.

Interventions: Any strategy aiming to increase participation in school-based health surveys. The comparator was usual procedure or an alternative strategy to increase participation.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcomes included participation and consent rates. Secondary outcomes were feasibility, acceptability and adverse effects.

Results: The search identified 591 unique records, of which 587 were excluded. Four studies were suitable for inclusion, including one systematic review, one randomised controlled trial, one cross-sectional study and one retrospective analysis. Based on very low certainty evidence, recommendations for maximising participation rates in one systematic review of US studies included: promoting the survey to school staff, parents and students; disseminating study information using direct rather than mediated methods; offering incentives to schools, staff and participants; following up non-responders; and employing a research team member to co-ordinate and monitor recruitment. However, UK studies found that different strategies did not increase participation more than that achieved by a standard approach (delivery of covering letter/consent forms via the child with no follow-up of non-responders).

Conclusion: Given the lack of evidence of effectiveness of alternative strategies in the UK, additional measures beyond existing standard approaches for active consent cannot be recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Community dental health
Community dental health 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
75
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is concerned with dental public health and related subjects. Dental public health is the science and the art of preventing oral disease, promoting oral health, and improving the quality of life through the organised efforts of society. The discipline covers a wide range and includes such topics as: -oral epidemiology- oral health services research- preventive dentistry - especially in relation to communities- oral health education and promotion- clinical research - with particular emphasis on the care of special groups- behavioural sciences related to dentistry- decision theory- quality of life- risk analysis- ethics and oral health economics- quality assessment. The journal publishes scientific articles on the relevant fields, review articles, discussion papers, news items, and editorials. It is of interest to dentists working in dental public health and to other professionals concerned with disease prevention, health service planning, and health promotion throughout the world. In the case of epidemiology of oral diseases the Journal prioritises national studies unless local studies have major methodological innovations or information of particular interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信