高水平与低水平的利他主义和志愿服务对居住在社区的老年人 4 年随访认知表现的影响》(The Effects of High versus Level of Altruism and Volunteering on the 4-Year Follow-Up Cognitive Performance of Community-Dwelling Older Adults)。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Clinical Gerontologist Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-23 DOI:10.1080/07317115.2023.2205847
Giancarlo Lucchetti, Jimilly Caputo Corrêa, Maria Priscila Wermelinger Ávila, Alessandra Lamas Granero Lucchetti
{"title":"高水平与低水平的利他主义和志愿服务对居住在社区的老年人 4 年随访认知表现的影响》(The Effects of High versus Level of Altruism and Volunteering on the 4-Year Follow-Up Cognitive Performance of Community-Dwelling Older Adults)。","authors":"Giancarlo Lucchetti, Jimilly Caputo Corrêa, Maria Priscila Wermelinger Ávila, Alessandra Lamas Granero Lucchetti","doi":"10.1080/07317115.2023.2205847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Currently, there is a growing interest on the benefits of volunteering. Nevertheless, there is scarce evidence for non-volunteering altruistic behaviors. This study aims to investigate the role of both altruism and volunteering on the cognitive performance of older individuals followed for four years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was cohort study carried out in 180 Brazilian older adults assessed in three different timepoints (baseline [2015-2016], 2 years of follow-up [2017-2018] and 4 years of follow-up [2019-2020]). Composite cognitive score was calculated based on the Mini-Mental State Examination, Verbal Fluency, Clock-Drawing test, and CERAD Word-List. Altruism was assessed through the Self-reported Altruism Scale and self-reported volunteering status. Mixed ANCOVAS were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For altruism, there were significant differences in all time points (Baseline, 2 years and 4 years) favoring higher cognitive scores for higher levels of altruism. However, no differences were observed for volunteering in all time points.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Having higher levels of altruism was significantly associated with better cognitive scores.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Altruism, even without volunteering, seem to have positive effects on the cognitive functioning of older adults. Health professionals who take care of older adults might take account of the presence or absence of altruistic behaviors of their patients in their formulations and recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10376,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":"988-995"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of High versus Low Levels of Altruism and Volunteering on the 4-Year Follow-Up Cognitive Performance of Community-Dwelling Older Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Giancarlo Lucchetti, Jimilly Caputo Corrêa, Maria Priscila Wermelinger Ávila, Alessandra Lamas Granero Lucchetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07317115.2023.2205847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Currently, there is a growing interest on the benefits of volunteering. Nevertheless, there is scarce evidence for non-volunteering altruistic behaviors. This study aims to investigate the role of both altruism and volunteering on the cognitive performance of older individuals followed for four years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was cohort study carried out in 180 Brazilian older adults assessed in three different timepoints (baseline [2015-2016], 2 years of follow-up [2017-2018] and 4 years of follow-up [2019-2020]). Composite cognitive score was calculated based on the Mini-Mental State Examination, Verbal Fluency, Clock-Drawing test, and CERAD Word-List. Altruism was assessed through the Self-reported Altruism Scale and self-reported volunteering status. Mixed ANCOVAS were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For altruism, there were significant differences in all time points (Baseline, 2 years and 4 years) favoring higher cognitive scores for higher levels of altruism. However, no differences were observed for volunteering in all time points.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Having higher levels of altruism was significantly associated with better cognitive scores.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Altruism, even without volunteering, seem to have positive effects on the cognitive functioning of older adults. Health professionals who take care of older adults might take account of the presence or absence of altruistic behaviors of their patients in their formulations and recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Gerontologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"988-995\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Gerontologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2023.2205847\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2023.2205847","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目前,人们对志愿服务的益处越来越感兴趣。然而,关于非志愿利他行为的证据却很少。本研究旨在调查利他主义和志愿服务对老年人四年认知能力的影响:这是一项队列研究,在三个不同的时间点(基线[2015-2016 年]、2 年随访[2017-2018 年]和 4 年随访[2019-2020 年])对 180 名巴西老年人进行了评估。根据迷你精神状态检查、言语流畅性、时钟绘制测试和 CERAD 单词表计算综合认知分数。利他主义通过自报利他主义量表和自报志愿服务状况进行评估。结果:在利他主义方面,所有时间点(基线、2 年和 4 年)均存在显著差异,利他主义水平越高,认知得分越高。结论:利他主义水平越高,认知分数越高:结论:利他主义水平越高,认知得分越高:临床意义:利他主义,即使没有志愿服务,似乎对老年人的认知功能也有积极影响。照顾老年人的医疗专业人员在制定和建议方案时,不妨考虑患者是否有利他主义行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effects of High versus Low Levels of Altruism and Volunteering on the 4-Year Follow-Up Cognitive Performance of Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

Objectives: Currently, there is a growing interest on the benefits of volunteering. Nevertheless, there is scarce evidence for non-volunteering altruistic behaviors. This study aims to investigate the role of both altruism and volunteering on the cognitive performance of older individuals followed for four years.

Methods: This was cohort study carried out in 180 Brazilian older adults assessed in three different timepoints (baseline [2015-2016], 2 years of follow-up [2017-2018] and 4 years of follow-up [2019-2020]). Composite cognitive score was calculated based on the Mini-Mental State Examination, Verbal Fluency, Clock-Drawing test, and CERAD Word-List. Altruism was assessed through the Self-reported Altruism Scale and self-reported volunteering status. Mixed ANCOVAS were performed.

Results: For altruism, there were significant differences in all time points (Baseline, 2 years and 4 years) favoring higher cognitive scores for higher levels of altruism. However, no differences were observed for volunteering in all time points.

Conclusions: Having higher levels of altruism was significantly associated with better cognitive scores.

Clinical implications: Altruism, even without volunteering, seem to have positive effects on the cognitive functioning of older adults. Health professionals who take care of older adults might take account of the presence or absence of altruistic behaviors of their patients in their formulations and recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Gerontologist
Clinical Gerontologist GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Gerontologist presents original research, reviews, and clinical comments relevant to the needs of behavioral health professionals and all practitioners who work with older adults. Published in cooperation with Psychologists in Long Term Care, the journal is designed for psychologists, physicians, nurses, social workers, counselors (family, pastoral, and vocational), and other health professionals who address behavioral health concerns found in later life, including: -adjustments to changing roles- issues related to diversity and aging- family caregiving- spirituality- cognitive and psychosocial assessment- depression, anxiety, and PTSD- Alzheimer’s disease and other neurocognitive disorders- long term care- behavioral medicine in aging- rehabilitation and education for older adults. Each issue provides insightful articles on current topics. Submissions are peer reviewed by content experts and selected for both scholarship and relevance to the practitioner to ensure that the articles are among the best in the field. Authors report original research and conceptual reviews. A unique column in Clinical Gerontologist is “Clinical Comments." This section features brief observations and specific suggestions from practitioners which avoid elaborate research designs or long reference lists. This section is a unique opportunity for you to learn about the valuable clinical work of your peers in a short, concise format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信