在短期副作用方面,某些COVID-19疫苗是否比其他疫苗更好?

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Ceska a Slovenska Farmacie Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Radhwan Al-Zidan, Omeed Darweesh, Muhanad Salah, Pshtiwan Bebane, Hemn Ahmed, Ghayth Abdulrazzaq, Sadeel Shanshal, Nohad Alomari
{"title":"在短期副作用方面,某些COVID-19疫苗是否比其他疫苗更好?","authors":"Radhwan Al-Zidan,&nbsp;Omeed Darweesh,&nbsp;Muhanad Salah,&nbsp;Pshtiwan Bebane,&nbsp;Hemn Ahmed,&nbsp;Ghayth Abdulrazzaq,&nbsp;Sadeel Shanshal,&nbsp;Nohad Alomari","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Controlling the pandemic is primarily achieved through vaccination against COVID-19. Although various COVID-19 vaccines are used worldwide, little is known about their safety and side effects. As a result, the objectives of this research are to identify the shortterm side effects of the different COVID-19 vaccines used in Iraq. Furthermore, exploring the association between experienced side effects and the brand of vaccine received. The current study evaluated the shortterm side effects of Pfizer, Sinopharm and AstraZeneca vaccines among healthcare workers in Iraq. The study used a questionnaire that consisted of dedicated sections to collect demographic data, the brand of COVID-19 vaccine received, the short-term side effects, and the willingness to receive a third booster dose. Regarding the post-vaccination side effects, the studied COVID-19 vaccines showed a comparable range of side effects, such as headaches, fever, muscle pain, joint pain, malaise, tenderness, redness, as well as pain at the site of vaccination. However, the Pfizer vaccine showed a higher incidence of pain and tenderness at the site of injection and fever compared to AstraZeneca and Sinopharm, respectively. On the other hand, the Sinopharm vaccine was associated with a higher occurrence of headaches, muscle pain, joint pain, and malaise in comparison to the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines, respectively. In summary, the short-term side effects of the three vaccines were comparable; however, the AstraZeneca vaccine was associated with a lower risk of side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":38771,"journal":{"name":"Ceska a Slovenska Farmacie","volume":"72 1","pages":"45-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are some COVID-19 vaccines better than others regarding the short-term side effects?\",\"authors\":\"Radhwan Al-Zidan,&nbsp;Omeed Darweesh,&nbsp;Muhanad Salah,&nbsp;Pshtiwan Bebane,&nbsp;Hemn Ahmed,&nbsp;Ghayth Abdulrazzaq,&nbsp;Sadeel Shanshal,&nbsp;Nohad Alomari\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Controlling the pandemic is primarily achieved through vaccination against COVID-19. Although various COVID-19 vaccines are used worldwide, little is known about their safety and side effects. As a result, the objectives of this research are to identify the shortterm side effects of the different COVID-19 vaccines used in Iraq. Furthermore, exploring the association between experienced side effects and the brand of vaccine received. The current study evaluated the shortterm side effects of Pfizer, Sinopharm and AstraZeneca vaccines among healthcare workers in Iraq. The study used a questionnaire that consisted of dedicated sections to collect demographic data, the brand of COVID-19 vaccine received, the short-term side effects, and the willingness to receive a third booster dose. Regarding the post-vaccination side effects, the studied COVID-19 vaccines showed a comparable range of side effects, such as headaches, fever, muscle pain, joint pain, malaise, tenderness, redness, as well as pain at the site of vaccination. However, the Pfizer vaccine showed a higher incidence of pain and tenderness at the site of injection and fever compared to AstraZeneca and Sinopharm, respectively. On the other hand, the Sinopharm vaccine was associated with a higher occurrence of headaches, muscle pain, joint pain, and malaise in comparison to the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines, respectively. In summary, the short-term side effects of the three vaccines were comparable; however, the AstraZeneca vaccine was associated with a lower risk of side effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ceska a Slovenska Farmacie\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"45-54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ceska a Slovenska Farmacie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceska a Slovenska Farmacie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

控制大流行主要是通过接种COVID-19疫苗来实现的。尽管世界各地都在使用各种COVID-19疫苗,但人们对其安全性和副作用知之甚少。因此,本研究的目的是确定伊拉克使用的不同COVID-19疫苗的短期副作用。此外,探索所经历的副作用与接种的疫苗品牌之间的关系。目前的研究评估了辉瑞、国药和阿斯利康疫苗对伊拉克医护人员的短期副作用。该研究使用了一份由专门部分组成的问卷,以收集人口统计数据、接种的COVID-19疫苗的品牌、短期副作用以及接受第三次加强剂量的意愿。关于疫苗接种后的副作用,所研究的COVID-19疫苗显示出相当范围的副作用,如头痛、发烧、肌肉疼痛、关节疼痛、不适、压痛、发红以及接种部位疼痛。然而,与阿斯利康和国药相比,辉瑞疫苗分别显示注射部位疼痛和压痛和发烧的发生率更高。另一方面,与辉瑞和阿斯利康的疫苗相比,国药集团的疫苗与头痛、肌肉疼痛、关节疼痛和不适的发生率更高有关。总之,三种疫苗的短期副作用具有可比性;然而,阿斯利康疫苗的副作用风险较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are some COVID-19 vaccines better than others regarding the short-term side effects?

Controlling the pandemic is primarily achieved through vaccination against COVID-19. Although various COVID-19 vaccines are used worldwide, little is known about their safety and side effects. As a result, the objectives of this research are to identify the shortterm side effects of the different COVID-19 vaccines used in Iraq. Furthermore, exploring the association between experienced side effects and the brand of vaccine received. The current study evaluated the shortterm side effects of Pfizer, Sinopharm and AstraZeneca vaccines among healthcare workers in Iraq. The study used a questionnaire that consisted of dedicated sections to collect demographic data, the brand of COVID-19 vaccine received, the short-term side effects, and the willingness to receive a third booster dose. Regarding the post-vaccination side effects, the studied COVID-19 vaccines showed a comparable range of side effects, such as headaches, fever, muscle pain, joint pain, malaise, tenderness, redness, as well as pain at the site of vaccination. However, the Pfizer vaccine showed a higher incidence of pain and tenderness at the site of injection and fever compared to AstraZeneca and Sinopharm, respectively. On the other hand, the Sinopharm vaccine was associated with a higher occurrence of headaches, muscle pain, joint pain, and malaise in comparison to the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines, respectively. In summary, the short-term side effects of the three vaccines were comparable; however, the AstraZeneca vaccine was associated with a lower risk of side effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ceska a Slovenska Farmacie
Ceska a Slovenska Farmacie Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Přehledový článek je zaměřen zejména na metody přípravy, charakterizaci mikročástic a dále na charakteristiku a příklady jejich možného využití ve farmakoterapii. Mikročástice jako...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信