一个新的检查表外科手擦洗,以取代基于时间的方法-像素强度分析

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Lercan Aslan , Omer Subasi , Duygu Mizikoglu , Olgar Birsel , Seval Tanrikulu Kirisci , Ada Bas , Munam Arshad , Ismail Lazoglu , Aksel Seyahi
{"title":"一个新的检查表外科手擦洗,以取代基于时间的方法-像素强度分析","authors":"Lercan Aslan ,&nbsp;Omer Subasi ,&nbsp;Duygu Mizikoglu ,&nbsp;Olgar Birsel ,&nbsp;Seval Tanrikulu Kirisci ,&nbsp;Ada Bas ,&nbsp;Munam Arshad ,&nbsp;Ismail Lazoglu ,&nbsp;Aksel Seyahi","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2023.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Hand scrubbing is an absolute precaution to avoid surgical site infections. World Health Organization (WHO) recommends 4-min overall scrubbing (4MS) for surgical hand hygiene. However, we hypothesize that the more methodical 10-stroke counting technique (10SS) via locational partitioning of the arm is superior to WHO's superficial guideline dictating only the duration.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The mechanical efficiency of 4MS and 10SS techniques are compared.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>24 healthcare professionals were recruited for the study. A novel methodology was devised to quantify the average brightness change of skin-applied UV ink before and after scrubbing via pixel intensity analysis. A black-box setup is constructed with an integrated high-resolution camera to photograph the UV-stained dorsal arm. Each stain was then digitally isolated for brightness comparison.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>It was observed that the 10SS technique was overall more successful in removing the UV ink in comparison to the 4MS method (p = 0.014). In addition, a bias was observed in removing more percentage of the proximal stains when compared to middle and distal stains with the 4MS technique (p = 0.0027), while location-based brightness change averages were statistically equal with the 10SS technique (p = 0.423).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Clinical Relevance</h3><p>10SS provided not only a more mechanically efficient scrubbing but also a more homogenous cleaning than 4MS. We recommend the use of the 10SS technique to achieve more effective pre-surgical hand hygiene.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49463,"journal":{"name":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new checklist surgical hand scrub to replace time-based methods – A pixel intensity analysis\",\"authors\":\"Lercan Aslan ,&nbsp;Omer Subasi ,&nbsp;Duygu Mizikoglu ,&nbsp;Olgar Birsel ,&nbsp;Seval Tanrikulu Kirisci ,&nbsp;Ada Bas ,&nbsp;Munam Arshad ,&nbsp;Ismail Lazoglu ,&nbsp;Aksel Seyahi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.surge.2023.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Hand scrubbing is an absolute precaution to avoid surgical site infections. World Health Organization (WHO) recommends 4-min overall scrubbing (4MS) for surgical hand hygiene. However, we hypothesize that the more methodical 10-stroke counting technique (10SS) via locational partitioning of the arm is superior to WHO's superficial guideline dictating only the duration.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The mechanical efficiency of 4MS and 10SS techniques are compared.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>24 healthcare professionals were recruited for the study. A novel methodology was devised to quantify the average brightness change of skin-applied UV ink before and after scrubbing via pixel intensity analysis. A black-box setup is constructed with an integrated high-resolution camera to photograph the UV-stained dorsal arm. Each stain was then digitally isolated for brightness comparison.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>It was observed that the 10SS technique was overall more successful in removing the UV ink in comparison to the 4MS method (p = 0.014). In addition, a bias was observed in removing more percentage of the proximal stains when compared to middle and distal stains with the 4MS technique (p = 0.0027), while location-based brightness change averages were statistically equal with the 10SS technique (p = 0.423).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Clinical Relevance</h3><p>10SS provided not only a more mechanically efficient scrubbing but also a more homogenous cleaning than 4MS. We recommend the use of the 10SS technique to achieve more effective pre-surgical hand hygiene.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479666X23000434\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479666X23000434","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

洗手是避免手术部位感染的绝对预防措施。世界卫生组织(WHO)建议手术手卫生的全面清洗时间为4分钟(4MS)。然而,我们假设通过手臂的位置划分更有系统的10次中风计数技术(10SS)优于世卫组织仅规定持续时间的肤浅指南。目的比较4MS技术和10SS技术的机械效率。方法招募24名医护人员进行研究。设计了一种新的方法,通过像素强度分析来量化涂抹在皮肤上的UV油墨在擦洗前后的平均亮度变化。黑盒装置由集成的高分辨率相机组成,用于拍摄紫外线染色的背臂。然后对每个污点进行数字隔离以进行亮度比较。结果与4MS方法相比,10SS技术在去除UV油墨方面总体上更成功(p = 0.014)。此外,与使用4MS技术的中、远端染色剂相比,在去除近端染色剂百分比上存在偏差(p = 0.0027),而基于位置的亮度变化平均值与10SS技术在统计学上相等(p = 0.423)。与4MS相比,10ss不仅提供了更有效的机械擦洗,而且更均匀的清洁。我们建议使用10SS技术来实现更有效的术前手部卫生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A new checklist surgical hand scrub to replace time-based methods – A pixel intensity analysis

Background

Hand scrubbing is an absolute precaution to avoid surgical site infections. World Health Organization (WHO) recommends 4-min overall scrubbing (4MS) for surgical hand hygiene. However, we hypothesize that the more methodical 10-stroke counting technique (10SS) via locational partitioning of the arm is superior to WHO's superficial guideline dictating only the duration.

Purpose

The mechanical efficiency of 4MS and 10SS techniques are compared.

Methods

24 healthcare professionals were recruited for the study. A novel methodology was devised to quantify the average brightness change of skin-applied UV ink before and after scrubbing via pixel intensity analysis. A black-box setup is constructed with an integrated high-resolution camera to photograph the UV-stained dorsal arm. Each stain was then digitally isolated for brightness comparison.

Results

It was observed that the 10SS technique was overall more successful in removing the UV ink in comparison to the 4MS method (p = 0.014). In addition, a bias was observed in removing more percentage of the proximal stains when compared to middle and distal stains with the 4MS technique (p = 0.0027), while location-based brightness change averages were statistically equal with the 10SS technique (p = 0.423).

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance

10SS provided not only a more mechanically efficient scrubbing but also a more homogenous cleaning than 4MS. We recommend the use of the 10SS technique to achieve more effective pre-surgical hand hygiene.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its establishment in 2003, The Surgeon has established itself as one of the leading multidisciplinary surgical titles, both in print and online. The Surgeon is published for the worldwide surgical and dental communities. The goal of the Journal is to achieve wider national and international recognition, through a commitment to excellence in original research. In addition, both Colleges see the Journal as an important educational service, and consequently there is a particular focus on post-graduate development. Much of our educational role will continue to be achieved through publishing expanded review articles by leaders in their field. Articles in related areas to surgery and dentistry, such as healthcare management and education, are also welcomed. We aim to educate, entertain, give insight into new surgical techniques and technology, and provide a forum for debate and discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信