观察者对手腕掌侧倾斜的认同受前臂旋转的影响。

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jensen Emma Mathilde Kirkeby, Janni Jensen, Rasmussen S Benjamin, Tromborg B Hans, Ole Graumann
{"title":"观察者对手腕掌侧倾斜的认同受前臂旋转的影响。","authors":"Jensen Emma Mathilde Kirkeby,&nbsp;Janni Jensen,&nbsp;Rasmussen S Benjamin,&nbsp;Tromborg B Hans,&nbsp;Ole Graumann","doi":"10.1177/20584601231167146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dorsal/volar tilt is an important radiographic measurement commonly included in the treatment decision of distal radius fractures (DRFs). However, studies have shown that forearm positioning relative to rotation (i.e., supination and pronation) can affect the measured tilt value but with substantial interobserver variance.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine whether interobserver agreement on radiographic tilt measurement is influenced by forearm rotation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We radiographed 21 cadaveric forearms at 5° rotational intervals between 15° supination and 15° pronation on lateral radiographs. A radiologist and a hand surgeon measured tilt in a blinded and randomized fashion. Bland-Altman analyses with bias and limits of agreement (LoA) were used to estimate interobserver agreement for forearms in all degrees of rotation, non-rotated forearms, supinated forearms, and pronated forearms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interobserver agreement varied with forearm rotation. Bias (95% confidence interval [CI]; LoA) was -1.54° (95% CI: -2.53, -0.55; LoA: -13.46, 10.38) when measuring tilt on radiographs with all degrees of forearm rotation, and -1.48° (95% CI: -4.13, 1.17; LoA: -12.88, 9.92) when measuring tilt on true lateral 0° radiographs. When measuring on supinated and pronated radiographs, bias was -0.03° (95% CI: -1.35, 1.29; LoA: -8.34, 8.28) and -3.23° (95% CI: -5.41, -1.06; LoA: -16.90, 10.44), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interobserver agreement on tilt was similar when comparing measurements made on true lateral radiographs to those made on the group with all degrees of forearm rotation. However, interobserver agreement improved with supination and worsened with pronation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72063,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e1/08/10.1177_20584601231167146.PMC10123885.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observer agreement of volar tilt of the wrist is influenced by forearm rotation.\",\"authors\":\"Jensen Emma Mathilde Kirkeby,&nbsp;Janni Jensen,&nbsp;Rasmussen S Benjamin,&nbsp;Tromborg B Hans,&nbsp;Ole Graumann\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20584601231167146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dorsal/volar tilt is an important radiographic measurement commonly included in the treatment decision of distal radius fractures (DRFs). However, studies have shown that forearm positioning relative to rotation (i.e., supination and pronation) can affect the measured tilt value but with substantial interobserver variance.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine whether interobserver agreement on radiographic tilt measurement is influenced by forearm rotation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We radiographed 21 cadaveric forearms at 5° rotational intervals between 15° supination and 15° pronation on lateral radiographs. A radiologist and a hand surgeon measured tilt in a blinded and randomized fashion. Bland-Altman analyses with bias and limits of agreement (LoA) were used to estimate interobserver agreement for forearms in all degrees of rotation, non-rotated forearms, supinated forearms, and pronated forearms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interobserver agreement varied with forearm rotation. Bias (95% confidence interval [CI]; LoA) was -1.54° (95% CI: -2.53, -0.55; LoA: -13.46, 10.38) when measuring tilt on radiographs with all degrees of forearm rotation, and -1.48° (95% CI: -4.13, 1.17; LoA: -12.88, 9.92) when measuring tilt on true lateral 0° radiographs. When measuring on supinated and pronated radiographs, bias was -0.03° (95% CI: -1.35, 1.29; LoA: -8.34, 8.28) and -3.23° (95% CI: -5.41, -1.06; LoA: -16.90, 10.44), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interobserver agreement on tilt was similar when comparing measurements made on true lateral radiographs to those made on the group with all degrees of forearm rotation. However, interobserver agreement improved with supination and worsened with pronation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta radiologica open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e1/08/10.1177_20584601231167146.PMC10123885.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta radiologica open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20584601231167146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20584601231167146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:背侧/掌侧倾角是桡骨远端骨折(DRFs)治疗决策中一个重要的影像学指标。然而,研究表明,相对于旋转的前臂定位(即旋后和旋前)会影响测量的倾斜度值,但观察者之间存在很大的差异。目的:研究前臂旋转是否会影响观察者对放射倾斜测量的一致性。材料和方法:我们在侧位片上以15°旋后和15°旋前之间的5°旋转间隔对21具尸体前臂进行了x线摄影。一名放射科医生和一名手外科医生以盲法和随机方式测量了倾斜度。采用Bland-Altman偏倚分析和一致性限(LoA)来估计前臂在所有旋转度、未旋转的前臂、旋后的前臂和旋前的前臂的观察者间一致性。结果:观察者之间的一致性随前臂旋转而变化。偏差(95%置信区间[CI];LoA)为-1.54°(95% CI: -2.53, -0.55;在x线片上测量前臂所有旋转度的倾斜度时,LoA: -13.46, 10.38)和-1.48°(95% CI: -4.13, 1.17;在真正的横向0°x线片上测量倾斜时,LoA: -12.88, 9.92)。在旋前和旋前x线片上测量时,偏差为-0.03°(95% CI: -1.35, 1.29;贷款:-8.34,8.28)和-3.23°(95%置信区间CI: -5.41, -1.06;LoA分别为-16.90和10.44)。结论:当比较真实侧位x线片测量结果与前臂旋转不同程度组的测量结果时,观察者间对倾斜的一致意见是相似的。然而,观察者间一致性在旋后改善,在旋前恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Observer agreement of volar tilt of the wrist is influenced by forearm rotation.

Observer agreement of volar tilt of the wrist is influenced by forearm rotation.

Observer agreement of volar tilt of the wrist is influenced by forearm rotation.

Observer agreement of volar tilt of the wrist is influenced by forearm rotation.

Background: Dorsal/volar tilt is an important radiographic measurement commonly included in the treatment decision of distal radius fractures (DRFs). However, studies have shown that forearm positioning relative to rotation (i.e., supination and pronation) can affect the measured tilt value but with substantial interobserver variance.

Purpose: To examine whether interobserver agreement on radiographic tilt measurement is influenced by forearm rotation.

Material and methods: We radiographed 21 cadaveric forearms at 5° rotational intervals between 15° supination and 15° pronation on lateral radiographs. A radiologist and a hand surgeon measured tilt in a blinded and randomized fashion. Bland-Altman analyses with bias and limits of agreement (LoA) were used to estimate interobserver agreement for forearms in all degrees of rotation, non-rotated forearms, supinated forearms, and pronated forearms.

Results: Interobserver agreement varied with forearm rotation. Bias (95% confidence interval [CI]; LoA) was -1.54° (95% CI: -2.53, -0.55; LoA: -13.46, 10.38) when measuring tilt on radiographs with all degrees of forearm rotation, and -1.48° (95% CI: -4.13, 1.17; LoA: -12.88, 9.92) when measuring tilt on true lateral 0° radiographs. When measuring on supinated and pronated radiographs, bias was -0.03° (95% CI: -1.35, 1.29; LoA: -8.34, 8.28) and -3.23° (95% CI: -5.41, -1.06; LoA: -16.90, 10.44), respectively.

Conclusion: Interobserver agreement on tilt was similar when comparing measurements made on true lateral radiographs to those made on the group with all degrees of forearm rotation. However, interobserver agreement improved with supination and worsened with pronation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信