更快地加载SITA可以以最小的时间成本提高视野测试的频率和可靠性。

IF 2.8 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jeremy C.K. Tan MD, FRANZCO , Michael Kalloniatis PhD , Jack Phu PhD
{"title":"更快地加载SITA可以以最小的时间成本提高视野测试的频率和可靠性。","authors":"Jeremy C.K. Tan MD, FRANZCO ,&nbsp;Michael Kalloniatis PhD ,&nbsp;Jack Phu PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ogla.2023.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To report the outcomes of frontloaded visual field (VF) testing (2 tests per eye on the same visit) over 2 longitudinal, consecutive visits using SITA-Faster (SFR) in terms of global indices, reliability metrics, and test duration.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Prospective longitudinal study.</p></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><p>A total of 902 eyes of 463 subjects with normal, suspect, or manifest glaucoma.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>Two intravisit SFR VF tests (T1 and T2) per eye at an initial (T</span><sub>i</sub>) and follow-up (T<sub>f</sub>) visit.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Intra- and intervisit global indices, reliability metrics, and test durations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean age of the subjects was 63.6 years, and 58.3% were male. Seven hundred ninety eyes (87.4%) had a diagnosis of glaucoma or glaucoma suspicion. The mean duration between visits was 265.0 (standard deviation 98.8) days. In total, 3608 VF tests were analyzed, with the correlation of mean deviation (MD) values of the frontloaded tests at each visit high (T1/T2 MD correlation at initial visit <em>r</em> = 0.83, root mean squared error [RMSE] = 1.26, follow-up visit <em>r</em> = 0.83, RMSE = 1.25, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) and greater than the correlation of MD between visits (T<sub>i</sub>1/T<sub>f</sub>1 MD correlation <em>r</em> = 0.72, RMSE = 1.31). There was a significant intra-visit decrease in rates of abnormally high sensitivity in the glaucoma hemifield test (3.2% vs. 1.6%, <em>P</em> = 0.0023) and rates of unreliable test results (15.4% vs. 9.2%, <em>P</em> = 0.002) from T1 to T2 in both visits, with a corresponding significant decrease in MD (–1.28 dB vs. –1.68 dB, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) and VF index (<em>P</em> = 0.03). The mean duration of each SFR test was 132.6 (SD 27.2) seconds.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Frontloading VFs using SFR produced sets of repeatable perimetric data with significant improvement of reliability indices from the first to second test. This may help increase testing frequency at minimal time cost to meet recommended guidelines and for evaluating patients prone to high variability.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><p>The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19519,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frontloading SITA-Faster Can Increase Frequency and Reliability of Visual Field Testing at Minimal Time Cost\",\"authors\":\"Jeremy C.K. Tan MD, FRANZCO ,&nbsp;Michael Kalloniatis PhD ,&nbsp;Jack Phu PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ogla.2023.03.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To report the outcomes of frontloaded visual field (VF) testing (2 tests per eye on the same visit) over 2 longitudinal, consecutive visits using SITA-Faster (SFR) in terms of global indices, reliability metrics, and test duration.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Prospective longitudinal study.</p></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><p>A total of 902 eyes of 463 subjects with normal, suspect, or manifest glaucoma.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>Two intravisit SFR VF tests (T1 and T2) per eye at an initial (T</span><sub>i</sub>) and follow-up (T<sub>f</sub>) visit.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Intra- and intervisit global indices, reliability metrics, and test durations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean age of the subjects was 63.6 years, and 58.3% were male. Seven hundred ninety eyes (87.4%) had a diagnosis of glaucoma or glaucoma suspicion. The mean duration between visits was 265.0 (standard deviation 98.8) days. In total, 3608 VF tests were analyzed, with the correlation of mean deviation (MD) values of the frontloaded tests at each visit high (T1/T2 MD correlation at initial visit <em>r</em> = 0.83, root mean squared error [RMSE] = 1.26, follow-up visit <em>r</em> = 0.83, RMSE = 1.25, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) and greater than the correlation of MD between visits (T<sub>i</sub>1/T<sub>f</sub>1 MD correlation <em>r</em> = 0.72, RMSE = 1.31). There was a significant intra-visit decrease in rates of abnormally high sensitivity in the glaucoma hemifield test (3.2% vs. 1.6%, <em>P</em> = 0.0023) and rates of unreliable test results (15.4% vs. 9.2%, <em>P</em> = 0.002) from T1 to T2 in both visits, with a corresponding significant decrease in MD (–1.28 dB vs. –1.68 dB, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) and VF index (<em>P</em> = 0.03). The mean duration of each SFR test was 132.6 (SD 27.2) seconds.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Frontloading VFs using SFR produced sets of repeatable perimetric data with significant improvement of reliability indices from the first to second test. This may help increase testing frequency at minimal time cost to meet recommended guidelines and for evaluating patients prone to high variability.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><p>The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589419623000649\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589419623000649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:报告使用SITA Faster(SFR)进行的2次纵向连续访视的前负荷视野(VF)测试(同一次访视每只眼睛2次测试)的结果,包括全局指数、可靠性指标和测试持续时间。设计:前瞻性纵向研究。受试者:463名受试者中的902只眼睛患有正常、可疑或明显的青光眼。方法:在初次(Ti)和随访(Tf)访视时,每只眼睛进行两次访视内SFR VF测试(T1和T2)。主要结果指标:访视内和访视间全球指数、可靠性指标和测试持续时间。结果:受试者的平均年龄为63.6岁,其中58.3%为男性。790眼(87.4%)被诊断为青光眼或怀疑青光眼。两次就诊的平均持续时间为265.0天(标准差98.8)。总共分析了3608次VF测试,每次访视时前负荷测试的平均偏差(MD)值的相关性较高(初次访视时T1/T2 MD相关性r=0.83,均方根误差[RMSE]=1.26,随访访视时r=0.83、均方根误差=1.25,P<0.0001),并且大于访视之间MD的相关性(Ti1/Tf1 MD相关性r=0.72,均方根值=1.31)在两次访视中,从T1到T2,青光眼半视野测试的异常高灵敏度(3.2%对1.6%,P=0.0023)和不可靠测试结果的发生率(15.4%对9.2%,P=0.002),MD(-1.28dB对-1.68dB,P<0.0001)和VF指数(P=0.003)相应显著下降。每次SFR测试的平均持续时间为132.6(SD 27.2)秒。结论:使用SFR的前负荷VFs产生了一组可重复的周长数据,从第一次测试到第二次测试的可靠性指标显著提高。这可能有助于以最小的时间成本增加检测频率,以满足推荐指南的要求,并用于评估易发生高度变异的患者。财务披露:作者对本文中讨论的任何材料都没有所有权或商业利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frontloading SITA-Faster Can Increase Frequency and Reliability of Visual Field Testing at Minimal Time Cost

Purpose

To report the outcomes of frontloaded visual field (VF) testing (2 tests per eye on the same visit) over 2 longitudinal, consecutive visits using SITA-Faster (SFR) in terms of global indices, reliability metrics, and test duration.

Design

Prospective longitudinal study.

Subjects

A total of 902 eyes of 463 subjects with normal, suspect, or manifest glaucoma.

Methods

Two intravisit SFR VF tests (T1 and T2) per eye at an initial (Ti) and follow-up (Tf) visit.

Main Outcome Measures

Intra- and intervisit global indices, reliability metrics, and test durations.

Results

The mean age of the subjects was 63.6 years, and 58.3% were male. Seven hundred ninety eyes (87.4%) had a diagnosis of glaucoma or glaucoma suspicion. The mean duration between visits was 265.0 (standard deviation 98.8) days. In total, 3608 VF tests were analyzed, with the correlation of mean deviation (MD) values of the frontloaded tests at each visit high (T1/T2 MD correlation at initial visit r = 0.83, root mean squared error [RMSE] = 1.26, follow-up visit r = 0.83, RMSE = 1.25, P < 0.0001) and greater than the correlation of MD between visits (Ti1/Tf1 MD correlation r = 0.72, RMSE = 1.31). There was a significant intra-visit decrease in rates of abnormally high sensitivity in the glaucoma hemifield test (3.2% vs. 1.6%, P = 0.0023) and rates of unreliable test results (15.4% vs. 9.2%, P = 0.002) from T1 to T2 in both visits, with a corresponding significant decrease in MD (–1.28 dB vs. –1.68 dB, P < 0.0001) and VF index (P = 0.03). The mean duration of each SFR test was 132.6 (SD 27.2) seconds.

Conclusions

Frontloading VFs using SFR produced sets of repeatable perimetric data with significant improvement of reliability indices from the first to second test. This may help increase testing frequency at minimal time cost to meet recommended guidelines and for evaluating patients prone to high variability.

Financial Disclosure(s)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
140
审稿时长
46 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信