Nicolò Rossi, Henrique Hadad, Maria Bejar-Chapa, Giuseppe M Peretti, Mark A Randolph, Robert W Redmond, Fernando P S Guastaldi
{"title":"骨髓干细胞与组织工程支架治疗大骨节段缺损:系统综述。","authors":"Nicolò Rossi, Henrique Hadad, Maria Bejar-Chapa, Giuseppe M Peretti, Mark A Randolph, Robert W Redmond, Fernando P S Guastaldi","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Critical-sized bone defects (CSBDs) represent a significant clinical challenge, stimulating researchers to seek new methods for successful bone reconstruction. The aim of this systematic review is to assess whether bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) combined with tissue-engineered scaffolds have demonstrated improved bone regeneration in the treatment of CSBD in large preclinical animal models. A search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) focused on <i>in vivo</i> large animal studies identified 10 articles according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) <i>in vivo</i> large animal models with segmental bone defects; (2) treatment with tissue-engineered scaffolds combined with BMSCs; (3) the presence of a control group; and (4) a minimum of a histological analysis outcome. Animal research: reporting of in Vivo Experiments guidelines were used for quality assessment, and Systematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Experimentation's risk of bias tool was used to define internal validity. The results demonstrated that tissue-engineered scaffolds, either from autografts or allografts, when combined with BMSCs provide improved bone mineralization and bone formation, including a critical role in the remodeling phase of bone healing. BMSC-seeded scaffolds showed improved biomechanical properties and microarchitecture properties of the regenerated bone when compared with untreated and scaffold-alone groups. This review highlights the efficacy of tissue engineering strategies for the repair of extensive bone defects in preclinical large-animal models. In particular, the use of mesenchymal stem cells, combined with bioscaffolds, seems to be a successful method in comparison to cell-free scaffolds.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"457-472"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bone Marrow Stem Cells with Tissue-Engineered Scaffolds for Large Bone Segmental Defects: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolò Rossi, Henrique Hadad, Maria Bejar-Chapa, Giuseppe M Peretti, Mark A Randolph, Robert W Redmond, Fernando P S Guastaldi\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Critical-sized bone defects (CSBDs) represent a significant clinical challenge, stimulating researchers to seek new methods for successful bone reconstruction. The aim of this systematic review is to assess whether bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) combined with tissue-engineered scaffolds have demonstrated improved bone regeneration in the treatment of CSBD in large preclinical animal models. A search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) focused on <i>in vivo</i> large animal studies identified 10 articles according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) <i>in vivo</i> large animal models with segmental bone defects; (2) treatment with tissue-engineered scaffolds combined with BMSCs; (3) the presence of a control group; and (4) a minimum of a histological analysis outcome. Animal research: reporting of in Vivo Experiments guidelines were used for quality assessment, and Systematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Experimentation's risk of bias tool was used to define internal validity. The results demonstrated that tissue-engineered scaffolds, either from autografts or allografts, when combined with BMSCs provide improved bone mineralization and bone formation, including a critical role in the remodeling phase of bone healing. BMSC-seeded scaffolds showed improved biomechanical properties and microarchitecture properties of the regenerated bone when compared with untreated and scaffold-alone groups. This review highlights the efficacy of tissue engineering strategies for the repair of extensive bone defects in preclinical large-animal models. In particular, the use of mesenchymal stem cells, combined with bioscaffolds, seems to be a successful method in comparison to cell-free scaffolds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"457-472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0213\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0213","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
临界大小骨缺损(CSBD)是一项重大的临床挑战,刺激研究人员寻求成功的骨重建新方法。本系统综述的目的是评估骨髓干细胞(BMSC)与组织工程支架相结合是否在大型临床前动物模型中改善了CSBD的骨再生。根据以下纳入标准,对电子数据库(PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library)进行了集中于体内大型动物研究的搜索,确定了10篇文章:(1)具有节段性骨缺损的体内大型动物模型;(2) 组织工程支架与骨髓基质干细胞联合治疗;(3) 对照组的存在;以及(4)组织学分析结果的最小值。动物研究:使用体内实验指南的报告进行质量评估,并使用实验室动物实验系统审查中心的偏倚风险工具来定义内部有效性。结果表明,组织工程支架,无论是来自自体移植物还是同种异体移植物,当与骨髓基质干细胞结合时,都能改善骨矿化和骨形成,包括在骨愈合的重塑阶段发挥关键作用。与未处理组和单独支架组相比,接种BMSC的支架显示出再生骨的生物力学特性和微结构特性有所改善。这篇综述强调了组织工程策略在临床前大型动物模型中修复广泛骨缺损的疗效。特别是,与无细胞支架相比,使用间充质干细胞与生物支架相结合似乎是一种成功的方法。
Bone Marrow Stem Cells with Tissue-Engineered Scaffolds for Large Bone Segmental Defects: A Systematic Review.
Critical-sized bone defects (CSBDs) represent a significant clinical challenge, stimulating researchers to seek new methods for successful bone reconstruction. The aim of this systematic review is to assess whether bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) combined with tissue-engineered scaffolds have demonstrated improved bone regeneration in the treatment of CSBD in large preclinical animal models. A search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) focused on in vivo large animal studies identified 10 articles according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) in vivo large animal models with segmental bone defects; (2) treatment with tissue-engineered scaffolds combined with BMSCs; (3) the presence of a control group; and (4) a minimum of a histological analysis outcome. Animal research: reporting of in Vivo Experiments guidelines were used for quality assessment, and Systematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Experimentation's risk of bias tool was used to define internal validity. The results demonstrated that tissue-engineered scaffolds, either from autografts or allografts, when combined with BMSCs provide improved bone mineralization and bone formation, including a critical role in the remodeling phase of bone healing. BMSC-seeded scaffolds showed improved biomechanical properties and microarchitecture properties of the regenerated bone when compared with untreated and scaffold-alone groups. This review highlights the efficacy of tissue engineering strategies for the repair of extensive bone defects in preclinical large-animal models. In particular, the use of mesenchymal stem cells, combined with bioscaffolds, seems to be a successful method in comparison to cell-free scaffolds.
期刊介绍:
Tissue Engineering Reviews (Part B) meets the urgent need for high-quality review articles by presenting critical literature overviews and systematic summaries of research within the field to assess the current standing and future directions within relevant areas and technologies. Part B publishes bi-monthly.