Anna Roach, Sophie Cullinan, Roz Shafran, Isobel Heyman, Sophie Bennett
{"title":"对患有内化障碍的儿童和青少年实施简短和低强度的心理干预:快速现实主义回顾。","authors":"Anna Roach, Sophie Cullinan, Roz Shafran, Isobel Heyman, Sophie Bennett","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldad001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many children fail to receive the mental health treatments they need, despite strong evidence demonstrating efficacy of brief and low-intensity psychological interventions. This review identifies the barriers and facilitators to their implementation.</p><p><strong>Sources of data: </strong>PsycInfo, EMBASE and Medline were searched and a systematic approach to data extraction using Normalization Process Theory highlighted key mechanisms and contextual factors.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>Ten interventions from 9 papers, including 371 young people, were included. Studies identified organizational demands, lack of implementation strategy and stigma as barriers to implementation, and clear training and plans for implementation as facilitators.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>No standardized implementation outcomes were used across papers so meta-analysis was not possible.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>Barriers and facilitators have been clearly identified across different settings.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>Longitudinal studies can identify methods and processes for enhancing long-term implementation and considers ways to monitor and evaluate uptake into routine practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"145 1","pages":"120-131"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10075242/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing brief and low-intensity psychological interventions for children and young people with internalizing disorders: a rapid realist review.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Roach, Sophie Cullinan, Roz Shafran, Isobel Heyman, Sophie Bennett\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bmb/ldad001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many children fail to receive the mental health treatments they need, despite strong evidence demonstrating efficacy of brief and low-intensity psychological interventions. This review identifies the barriers and facilitators to their implementation.</p><p><strong>Sources of data: </strong>PsycInfo, EMBASE and Medline were searched and a systematic approach to data extraction using Normalization Process Theory highlighted key mechanisms and contextual factors.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>Ten interventions from 9 papers, including 371 young people, were included. Studies identified organizational demands, lack of implementation strategy and stigma as barriers to implementation, and clear training and plans for implementation as facilitators.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>No standardized implementation outcomes were used across papers so meta-analysis was not possible.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>Barriers and facilitators have been clearly identified across different settings.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>Longitudinal studies can identify methods and processes for enhancing long-term implementation and considers ways to monitor and evaluate uptake into routine practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British medical bulletin\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"120-131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10075242/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British medical bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldad001\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldad001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Implementing brief and low-intensity psychological interventions for children and young people with internalizing disorders: a rapid realist review.
Introduction: Many children fail to receive the mental health treatments they need, despite strong evidence demonstrating efficacy of brief and low-intensity psychological interventions. This review identifies the barriers and facilitators to their implementation.
Sources of data: PsycInfo, EMBASE and Medline were searched and a systematic approach to data extraction using Normalization Process Theory highlighted key mechanisms and contextual factors.
Areas of agreement: Ten interventions from 9 papers, including 371 young people, were included. Studies identified organizational demands, lack of implementation strategy and stigma as barriers to implementation, and clear training and plans for implementation as facilitators.
Areas of controversy: No standardized implementation outcomes were used across papers so meta-analysis was not possible.
Growing points: Barriers and facilitators have been clearly identified across different settings.
Areas timely for developing research: Longitudinal studies can identify methods and processes for enhancing long-term implementation and considers ways to monitor and evaluate uptake into routine practice.
期刊介绍：
British Medical Bulletin is a multidisciplinary publication, which comprises high quality reviews aimed at generalist physicians, junior doctors, and medical students in both developed and developing countries.
Its key aims are to provide interpretations of growing points in medicine by trusted experts in the field, and to assist practitioners in incorporating not just evidence but new conceptual ways of thinking into their practice.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
