基于AsCas12a和多导阵列的全基因组CRISPR筛选优化

IF 3.7 4区 生物学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Sakina Petiwala, Apexa Modi, Tifani Anton, Erin Murphy, Sabah Kadri, Hengcheng Hu, Charles Lu, Michael J Flister, Daniel Verduzco
{"title":"基于AsCas12a和多导阵列的全基因组CRISPR筛选优化","authors":"Sakina Petiwala,&nbsp;Apexa Modi,&nbsp;Tifani Anton,&nbsp;Erin Murphy,&nbsp;Sabah Kadri,&nbsp;Hengcheng Hu,&nbsp;Charles Lu,&nbsp;Michael J Flister,&nbsp;Daniel Verduzco","doi":"10.1089/crispr.2022.0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genomewide loss-of-function (LOF) screening using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) has facilitated the discovery of novel gene functions across diverse physiological and pathophysiological systems. A challenge with conventional genomewide CRISPR-Cas9 libraries is the unwieldy size (60,000-120,000 constructs), which is resource intensive and prohibitive in some experimental contexts. One solution to streamlining CRISPR screening is by multiplexing two or more guides per gene on a single construct, which enables functional redundancy to compensate for suboptimal gene knockout by individual guides. In this regard, AsCas12a (Cpf1) and its derivatives, for example, enhanced AsCas12a (enAsCas12a), have enabled multiplexed guide arrays to be specifically and efficiently processed for genome editing. Prior studies have established that multiplexed CRISPR-Cas12a libraries perform comparably to the larger equivalent CRISPR-Cas9 libraries, yet the most efficient CRISPR-Cas12a library design remains unresolved. In this study, we demonstrate that CRISPR-Cas12a genomewide LOF screening performed optimally with three guides arrayed per gene construct and could be adapted to robotic cell culture without noticeable differences in screen performance. Thus, the conclusions from this study provide novel insight to streamlining genomewide LOF screening using CRISPR-Cas12a and robotic cell culture.</p>","PeriodicalId":54232,"journal":{"name":"CRISPR Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization of Genomewide CRISPR Screens Using AsCas12a and Multi-Guide Arrays.\",\"authors\":\"Sakina Petiwala,&nbsp;Apexa Modi,&nbsp;Tifani Anton,&nbsp;Erin Murphy,&nbsp;Sabah Kadri,&nbsp;Hengcheng Hu,&nbsp;Charles Lu,&nbsp;Michael J Flister,&nbsp;Daniel Verduzco\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/crispr.2022.0093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Genomewide loss-of-function (LOF) screening using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) has facilitated the discovery of novel gene functions across diverse physiological and pathophysiological systems. A challenge with conventional genomewide CRISPR-Cas9 libraries is the unwieldy size (60,000-120,000 constructs), which is resource intensive and prohibitive in some experimental contexts. One solution to streamlining CRISPR screening is by multiplexing two or more guides per gene on a single construct, which enables functional redundancy to compensate for suboptimal gene knockout by individual guides. In this regard, AsCas12a (Cpf1) and its derivatives, for example, enhanced AsCas12a (enAsCas12a), have enabled multiplexed guide arrays to be specifically and efficiently processed for genome editing. Prior studies have established that multiplexed CRISPR-Cas12a libraries perform comparably to the larger equivalent CRISPR-Cas9 libraries, yet the most efficient CRISPR-Cas12a library design remains unresolved. In this study, we demonstrate that CRISPR-Cas12a genomewide LOF screening performed optimally with three guides arrayed per gene construct and could be adapted to robotic cell culture without noticeable differences in screen performance. Thus, the conclusions from this study provide novel insight to streamlining genomewide LOF screening using CRISPR-Cas12a and robotic cell culture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CRISPR Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CRISPR Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/crispr.2022.0093\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CRISPR Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/crispr.2022.0093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用聚类规则间隔短回文重复序列(CRISPR)进行全基因组功能丧失(LOF)筛查,促进了在不同生理和病理生理系统中发现新的基因功能。传统的全基因组CRISPR-Cas9文库面临的挑战是庞大的规模(60,000-120,000个构建),这是资源密集型的,在某些实验环境中是令人望而却步的。简化CRISPR筛选的一种解决方案是在单个结构上对每个基因进行两个或更多向导的多路复用,从而实现功能冗余,以补偿单个向导的次优基因敲除。在这方面,AsCas12a (Cpf1)及其衍生物,例如增长型AsCas12a (enAsCas12a),使多路复用引导阵列能够被特异性和高效地处理,用于基因组编辑。先前的研究已经确定,多路CRISPR-Cas12a文库的性能与较大的等效CRISPR-Cas9文库相当,但最有效的CRISPR-Cas12a文库设计仍未解决。在这项研究中,我们证明CRISPR-Cas12a全基因组LOF筛选在每个基因构建中排列三个向导时表现最佳,并且可以适应机器人细胞培养,而筛选性能没有明显差异。因此,本研究的结论为利用CRISPR-Cas12a和机器人细胞培养简化全基因组LOF筛选提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimization of Genomewide CRISPR Screens Using AsCas12a and Multi-Guide Arrays.

Genomewide loss-of-function (LOF) screening using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) has facilitated the discovery of novel gene functions across diverse physiological and pathophysiological systems. A challenge with conventional genomewide CRISPR-Cas9 libraries is the unwieldy size (60,000-120,000 constructs), which is resource intensive and prohibitive in some experimental contexts. One solution to streamlining CRISPR screening is by multiplexing two or more guides per gene on a single construct, which enables functional redundancy to compensate for suboptimal gene knockout by individual guides. In this regard, AsCas12a (Cpf1) and its derivatives, for example, enhanced AsCas12a (enAsCas12a), have enabled multiplexed guide arrays to be specifically and efficiently processed for genome editing. Prior studies have established that multiplexed CRISPR-Cas12a libraries perform comparably to the larger equivalent CRISPR-Cas9 libraries, yet the most efficient CRISPR-Cas12a library design remains unresolved. In this study, we demonstrate that CRISPR-Cas12a genomewide LOF screening performed optimally with three guides arrayed per gene construct and could be adapted to robotic cell culture without noticeable differences in screen performance. Thus, the conclusions from this study provide novel insight to streamlining genomewide LOF screening using CRISPR-Cas12a and robotic cell culture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CRISPR Journal
CRISPR Journal Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: In recognition of this extraordinary scientific and technological era, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers recently announced the creation of The CRISPR Journal -- an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal publishing outstanding research on the myriad applications and underlying technology of CRISPR. Debuting in 2018, The CRISPR Journal will be published online and in print with flexible open access options, providing a high-profile venue for groundbreaking research, as well as lively and provocative commentary, analysis, and debate. The CRISPR Journal adds an exciting and dynamic component to the Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. portfolio, which includes GEN (Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News) and more than 80 leading peer-reviewed journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信