提高住院出院总结的质量。

Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3233/JRS-227026
Samit Patel, Isabel Utting, Wan Wei Ang, Tessa Fautz, Rebecca Radmore, Panayiota Vourou, Lara Beaumont, Paula Ryeland, Ashling Lillis
{"title":"提高住院出院总结的质量。","authors":"Samit Patel,&nbsp;Isabel Utting,&nbsp;Wan Wei Ang,&nbsp;Tessa Fautz,&nbsp;Rebecca Radmore,&nbsp;Panayiota Vourou,&nbsp;Lara Beaumont,&nbsp;Paula Ryeland,&nbsp;Ashling Lillis","doi":"10.3233/JRS-227026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Discharge summaries (DCS) are vital in facilitating handover to community colleagues. Unfortunately, at Whittington Health, General Practitioners (GPs) found it difficult to identify relevant information in DCS, and use of medical jargon meant patients did not understand details of their admission. With this quality improvement project, the team aimed to improve DCS to enhance patient-centered care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this quality improvement project (QIP) was to improve the quality of DCS by critiquing the ones produced within our trust and implementing various interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were completed. A multi-disciplinary meeting was conducted to identify the needs of each party in a DCS. A new template was subsequently launched. Teaching was conducted and educational leaflets were disseminated hospital-wide. Quality of written communication was audited quarterly, and evaluated against quality indicators. Problems with DCS were identified via GP and patient feedback, and these became the focus of subsequent PDSA cycles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From March 2019 to February 2020, all the audited categories improved, with an overall improvement from 67% to 92%. We also received positive feedback from GPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Quality of DCS can be improved with appropriate interventions, leading to improved patient care. A similar PDSA cycle could be utilized elsewhere to achieve similar results.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d6/b3/jrs-33-jrs227026.PMC9844071.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the quality of inpatient discharge summaries.\",\"authors\":\"Samit Patel,&nbsp;Isabel Utting,&nbsp;Wan Wei Ang,&nbsp;Tessa Fautz,&nbsp;Rebecca Radmore,&nbsp;Panayiota Vourou,&nbsp;Lara Beaumont,&nbsp;Paula Ryeland,&nbsp;Ashling Lillis\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/JRS-227026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Discharge summaries (DCS) are vital in facilitating handover to community colleagues. Unfortunately, at Whittington Health, General Practitioners (GPs) found it difficult to identify relevant information in DCS, and use of medical jargon meant patients did not understand details of their admission. With this quality improvement project, the team aimed to improve DCS to enhance patient-centered care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this quality improvement project (QIP) was to improve the quality of DCS by critiquing the ones produced within our trust and implementing various interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were completed. A multi-disciplinary meeting was conducted to identify the needs of each party in a DCS. A new template was subsequently launched. Teaching was conducted and educational leaflets were disseminated hospital-wide. Quality of written communication was audited quarterly, and evaluated against quality indicators. Problems with DCS were identified via GP and patient feedback, and these became the focus of subsequent PDSA cycles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From March 2019 to February 2020, all the audited categories improved, with an overall improvement from 67% to 92%. We also received positive feedback from GPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Quality of DCS can be improved with appropriate interventions, leading to improved patient care. A similar PDSA cycle could be utilized elsewhere to achieve similar results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d6/b3/jrs-33-jrs227026.PMC9844071.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/JRS-227026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JRS-227026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:出院摘要(DCS)对于方便向社区同事移交工作至关重要。不幸的是,在Whittington Health,全科医生(gp)发现很难识别DCS中的相关信息,并且使用医学术语意味着患者不了解他们入院的细节。通过这个质量改进项目,该团队旨在改进DCS以增强以患者为中心的护理。目的:本质量改进项目(QIP)的目的是通过批评我们信任范围内产生的质量和实施各种干预措施来提高DCS的质量。方法:完成多个计划-做-研究-行动(PDSA)循环。举行了一次多学科会议,以确定DCS中每一方的需要。随后推出了一个新的模板。进行了教学,并在医院范围内散发了教育传单。书面沟通的质量每季度审核一次,并根据质量指标进行评估。通过全科医生和患者反馈确定DCS的问题,这些问题成为后续PDSA周期的重点。结果:从2019年3月到2020年2月,所有被审计的类别都有所改善,整体改善率从67%提高到92%。我们也收到全科医生的积极反馈。结论:通过适当的干预措施可以提高DCS的质量,从而改善患者的护理。类似的PDSA循环可以在其他地方使用,以取得类似的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Improving the quality of inpatient discharge summaries.

分享
查看原文
Improving the quality of inpatient discharge summaries.

Background: Discharge summaries (DCS) are vital in facilitating handover to community colleagues. Unfortunately, at Whittington Health, General Practitioners (GPs) found it difficult to identify relevant information in DCS, and use of medical jargon meant patients did not understand details of their admission. With this quality improvement project, the team aimed to improve DCS to enhance patient-centered care.

Objective: The aim of this quality improvement project (QIP) was to improve the quality of DCS by critiquing the ones produced within our trust and implementing various interventions.

Methods: Multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were completed. A multi-disciplinary meeting was conducted to identify the needs of each party in a DCS. A new template was subsequently launched. Teaching was conducted and educational leaflets were disseminated hospital-wide. Quality of written communication was audited quarterly, and evaluated against quality indicators. Problems with DCS were identified via GP and patient feedback, and these became the focus of subsequent PDSA cycles.

Results: From March 2019 to February 2020, all the audited categories improved, with an overall improvement from 67% to 92%. We also received positive feedback from GPs.

Conclusions: Quality of DCS can be improved with appropriate interventions, leading to improved patient care. A similar PDSA cycle could be utilized elsewhere to achieve similar results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信