儿童与生物伦理:澄清医学和研究环境中的同意和同意。

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Merle Spriggs
{"title":"儿童与生物伦理:澄清医学和研究环境中的同意和同意。","authors":"Merle Spriggs","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldac038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The concept of consent in the pediatric setting is complex and confusing. Clinicians and researchers want to know whose consent they should obtain, when a child can provide independent consent and how that is determined. The aim of this article is to establish what produces the justification to proceed with medical or research interventions involving children and the role of consent in that. I clarify concepts such as consent, assent, capacity and competence.</p><p><strong>Source of data: </strong>Literature review.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>Engaging with children and involving them in decisions about matters that affect them is a good thing.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>The role of competence or capacity and the question of when a child can provide sole consent.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>Flawed assumptions around competence/capacity.</p><p><strong>Areas for developing research: </strong>An account of children's well-being that accommodates children's interests during the transition to adulthood.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"145 1","pages":"110-119"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10075240/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Children and bioethics: clarifying consent and assent in medical and research settings.\",\"authors\":\"Merle Spriggs\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bmb/ldac038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The concept of consent in the pediatric setting is complex and confusing. Clinicians and researchers want to know whose consent they should obtain, when a child can provide independent consent and how that is determined. The aim of this article is to establish what produces the justification to proceed with medical or research interventions involving children and the role of consent in that. I clarify concepts such as consent, assent, capacity and competence.</p><p><strong>Source of data: </strong>Literature review.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>Engaging with children and involving them in decisions about matters that affect them is a good thing.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>The role of competence or capacity and the question of when a child can provide sole consent.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>Flawed assumptions around competence/capacity.</p><p><strong>Areas for developing research: </strong>An account of children's well-being that accommodates children's interests during the transition to adulthood.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British medical bulletin\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"110-119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10075240/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British medical bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldac038\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldac038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在儿科设置同意的概念是复杂和令人困惑的。临床医生和研究人员想知道他们应该征得谁的同意,孩子什么时候可以提供独立的同意,以及如何确定。本文的目的是确定是什么产生了进行涉及儿童的医疗或研究干预的理由,以及同意在其中的作用。我澄清了同意、同意、能力和能力等概念。数据来源:文献综述。共识领域:与儿童接触,让他们参与影响他们的事情的决定是一件好事。争议领域:能力或能力的作用,以及儿童何时可以完全同意的问题。成长点:对能力/能力的错误假设。发展研究领域:在儿童向成年过渡期间适应儿童兴趣的儿童福祉的说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Children and bioethics: clarifying consent and assent in medical and research settings.

Children and bioethics: clarifying consent and assent in medical and research settings.

Children and bioethics: clarifying consent and assent in medical and research settings.

Introduction: The concept of consent in the pediatric setting is complex and confusing. Clinicians and researchers want to know whose consent they should obtain, when a child can provide independent consent and how that is determined. The aim of this article is to establish what produces the justification to proceed with medical or research interventions involving children and the role of consent in that. I clarify concepts such as consent, assent, capacity and competence.

Source of data: Literature review.

Areas of agreement: Engaging with children and involving them in decisions about matters that affect them is a good thing.

Areas of controversy: The role of competence or capacity and the question of when a child can provide sole consent.

Growing points: Flawed assumptions around competence/capacity.

Areas for developing research: An account of children's well-being that accommodates children's interests during the transition to adulthood.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British medical bulletin
British medical bulletin 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.50%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: British Medical Bulletin is a multidisciplinary publication, which comprises high quality reviews aimed at generalist physicians, junior doctors, and medical students in both developed and developing countries. Its key aims are to provide interpretations of growing points in medicine by trusted experts in the field, and to assist practitioners in incorporating not just evidence but new conceptual ways of thinking into their practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信