优先研究非处方助听器(OTC)治疗与年龄相关的听力损失。

IF 3.3 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Frontiers in aging Pub Date : 2023-03-23 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fragi.2023.1105879
Vinaya Manchaiah, De Wet Swanepoel, Anu Sharma
{"title":"优先研究非处方助听器(OTC)治疗与年龄相关的听力损失。","authors":"Vinaya Manchaiah, De Wet Swanepoel, Anu Sharma","doi":"10.3389/fragi.2023.1105879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hearing aids are the most commonly used treatment for people with age-related hearing loss, however, hearing aid uptake is low, primarily due to high cost of the device, stigma, and a lack of perceived need. To address accessibility and affordability issues, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration created a new over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aid category. Various types of hearing devices are available for both individuals with hearing loss and for those with normal hearing, as hearing enhancement devices. Hearing aids (i.e., prescription hearing aids, self-fitting OTC hearing aids, and pre-set OTC hearing aids) are regulated by the FDA. The purpose of this article is to (a) provide a summary of existing research on direct-to-consumer (DTC) hearing devices such as Personal Sound Amplification Products (PSAPs) that informs OTC service delivery models; (b) provide an update on existing and ongoing randomized controlled trials on currently marketed OTC hearing aids; and (c) highlight the need for immediate research on OTC hearing aids and service delivery models to inform policy and clinical care. It remains to be seen what effect OTC hearing aids have on improving the uptake of hearing aids by individuals with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. However, there is scant research on all aspects of OTC hearing aids that are currently on the market. We conclude that high quality independent research must be prioritized to supplement evidence provided by the OTC hearing aid manufacturers for regulatory approval purposes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73061,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prioritizing research on over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids for age-related hearing loss.\",\"authors\":\"Vinaya Manchaiah, De Wet Swanepoel, Anu Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fragi.2023.1105879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hearing aids are the most commonly used treatment for people with age-related hearing loss, however, hearing aid uptake is low, primarily due to high cost of the device, stigma, and a lack of perceived need. To address accessibility and affordability issues, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration created a new over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aid category. Various types of hearing devices are available for both individuals with hearing loss and for those with normal hearing, as hearing enhancement devices. Hearing aids (i.e., prescription hearing aids, self-fitting OTC hearing aids, and pre-set OTC hearing aids) are regulated by the FDA. The purpose of this article is to (a) provide a summary of existing research on direct-to-consumer (DTC) hearing devices such as Personal Sound Amplification Products (PSAPs) that informs OTC service delivery models; (b) provide an update on existing and ongoing randomized controlled trials on currently marketed OTC hearing aids; and (c) highlight the need for immediate research on OTC hearing aids and service delivery models to inform policy and clinical care. It remains to be seen what effect OTC hearing aids have on improving the uptake of hearing aids by individuals with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. However, there is scant research on all aspects of OTC hearing aids that are currently on the market. We conclude that high quality independent research must be prioritized to supplement evidence provided by the OTC hearing aid manufacturers for regulatory approval purposes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in aging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078955/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fragi.2023.1105879\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fragi.2023.1105879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

助听器是与年龄相关的听力损失患者最常用的治疗方法,然而,助听器的使用率很低,主要是由于设备的高成本,耻辱感和缺乏感知需求。为了解决可获得性和可负担性问题,美国食品和药物管理局创建了一个新的非处方(OTC)助听器类别。听力损失人士和听力正常人士均可使用不同类型的助听器作为听力增强设备。助听器(即处方助听器、自配OTC助听器和预先设置OTC助听器)由FDA监管。本文的目的是(a)对直接面向消费者(DTC)的听力设备(如个人声音放大产品(psap))的现有研究进行总结,这些设备为OTC服务提供模式提供了信息;(b)提供目前已上市的非处方药助听器的现有和正在进行的随机对照试验的最新情况;(c)强调需要立即研究非处方助听器和服务提供模式,以便为政策和临床护理提供信息。OTC助听器对改善轻度至中度听力损失患者使用助听器的效果仍有待观察。然而,对目前市场上的OTC助听器的各个方面的研究很少。我们的结论是,必须优先考虑高质量的独立研究,以补充OTC助听器制造商提供的证据,以获得监管批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prioritizing research on over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids for age-related hearing loss.

Prioritizing research on over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids for age-related hearing loss.

Prioritizing research on over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids for age-related hearing loss.

Hearing aids are the most commonly used treatment for people with age-related hearing loss, however, hearing aid uptake is low, primarily due to high cost of the device, stigma, and a lack of perceived need. To address accessibility and affordability issues, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration created a new over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aid category. Various types of hearing devices are available for both individuals with hearing loss and for those with normal hearing, as hearing enhancement devices. Hearing aids (i.e., prescription hearing aids, self-fitting OTC hearing aids, and pre-set OTC hearing aids) are regulated by the FDA. The purpose of this article is to (a) provide a summary of existing research on direct-to-consumer (DTC) hearing devices such as Personal Sound Amplification Products (PSAPs) that informs OTC service delivery models; (b) provide an update on existing and ongoing randomized controlled trials on currently marketed OTC hearing aids; and (c) highlight the need for immediate research on OTC hearing aids and service delivery models to inform policy and clinical care. It remains to be seen what effect OTC hearing aids have on improving the uptake of hearing aids by individuals with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. However, there is scant research on all aspects of OTC hearing aids that are currently on the market. We conclude that high quality independent research must be prioritized to supplement evidence provided by the OTC hearing aid manufacturers for regulatory approval purposes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信