目前关于骨对增材制造的金属多孔支架的体内反应的解释:综述

Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Joseph Deering , Kathryn Grandfield
{"title":"目前关于骨对增材制造的金属多孔支架的体内反应的解释:综述","authors":"Joseph Deering ,&nbsp;Kathryn Grandfield","doi":"10.1016/j.bbiosy.2021.100013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent advances in the field of metallic additive manufacturing have expanded production capabilities for bone implants to include porous lattice structures. While traditional models of <em>de novo</em> bone formation can be applied to fully dense implant materials, their applicability to the interior of porous materials has not been well-characterized. Unlike other reviews that focus on materials and mechanical properties of lattice structures, this review compiles biological performance from <em>in vivo</em> studies in pre-clinical models only. First, we introduce the most common lattice geometry designs employed <em>in vivo</em> and discuss some of their fabrication advantages and limitations. Then lattice geometry is correlated to quantitative (histomorphometric) and qualitative (histological) assessments of osseointegration. We group studies according to two common implant variables: pore size and percent porosity, and explore the extent of osseointegration using common measures, including bone-implant contact (BIC), bone area (BA), bone volume/total volume (BV/TV) and biomechanical stability, for various animal models and implantation times. Based on this, trends related to <em>in vivo</em> bone formation on the interior of lattice structures are presented. Common challenges with lattice structures are highlighted, including nonuniformity of bone growth through the entirety of the lattice structure due to occlusion effects and avascularity. This review paper identifies a lack of systematic <em>in vivo</em> studies on porous AM implants to target optimum geometric design, including pore shape, size, and percent porosity in controlled animal models and critical-sized defects. Further work focusing on surface modification strategies and systematic geometric studies to homogenize <em>in vivo</em> bone growth through the scaffold interior are recommended to increase implant stability in the early stages of osseointegration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72379,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterials and biosystems","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100013"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bbiosy.2021.100013","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current interpretations on the in vivo response of bone to additively manufactured metallic porous scaffolds: A review\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Deering ,&nbsp;Kathryn Grandfield\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bbiosy.2021.100013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Recent advances in the field of metallic additive manufacturing have expanded production capabilities for bone implants to include porous lattice structures. While traditional models of <em>de novo</em> bone formation can be applied to fully dense implant materials, their applicability to the interior of porous materials has not been well-characterized. Unlike other reviews that focus on materials and mechanical properties of lattice structures, this review compiles biological performance from <em>in vivo</em> studies in pre-clinical models only. First, we introduce the most common lattice geometry designs employed <em>in vivo</em> and discuss some of their fabrication advantages and limitations. Then lattice geometry is correlated to quantitative (histomorphometric) and qualitative (histological) assessments of osseointegration. We group studies according to two common implant variables: pore size and percent porosity, and explore the extent of osseointegration using common measures, including bone-implant contact (BIC), bone area (BA), bone volume/total volume (BV/TV) and biomechanical stability, for various animal models and implantation times. Based on this, trends related to <em>in vivo</em> bone formation on the interior of lattice structures are presented. Common challenges with lattice structures are highlighted, including nonuniformity of bone growth through the entirety of the lattice structure due to occlusion effects and avascularity. This review paper identifies a lack of systematic <em>in vivo</em> studies on porous AM implants to target optimum geometric design, including pore shape, size, and percent porosity in controlled animal models and critical-sized defects. Further work focusing on surface modification strategies and systematic geometric studies to homogenize <em>in vivo</em> bone growth through the scaffold interior are recommended to increase implant stability in the early stages of osseointegration.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomaterials and biosystems\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100013\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bbiosy.2021.100013\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomaterials and biosystems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666534421000064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterials and biosystems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666534421000064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

金属增材制造领域的最新进展已经扩大了骨植入物的生产能力,包括多孔晶格结构。虽然传统的新生骨形成模型可以应用于完全致密的种植材料,但它们对多孔材料内部的适用性尚未得到很好的表征。与其他关注晶格结构材料和力学性能的综述不同,本综述仅在临床前模型中收集了体内研究的生物学性能。首先,我们介绍了在体内使用的最常见的晶格几何设计,并讨论了它们的一些制造优点和局限性。然后,点阵几何与骨整合的定量(组织形态学)和定性(组织学)评估相关。我们根据两个常见的种植体变量:孔径和孔隙率对研究进行分组,并使用常用的测量方法,包括骨-种植体接触(BIC)、骨面积(BA)、骨体积/总体积(BV/TV)和生物力学稳定性,探索不同动物模型和种植时间的骨整合程度。在此基础上,提出了晶格结构内部体内骨形成的相关趋势。强调了晶格结构的共同挑战,包括由于闭塞效应和无血管性导致的整个晶格结构的骨生长不均匀性。这篇综述文章指出,缺乏针对多孔AM植入物的系统体内研究,以实现最佳几何设计,包括在受控动物模型和临界尺寸缺陷中的孔形状、大小和孔隙率。建议进一步开展表面修饰策略和系统的几何研究,通过支架内部均匀化体内骨生长,以提高骨整合早期阶段种植体的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Current interpretations on the in vivo response of bone to additively manufactured metallic porous scaffolds: A review

Current interpretations on the in vivo response of bone to additively manufactured metallic porous scaffolds: A review

Current interpretations on the in vivo response of bone to additively manufactured metallic porous scaffolds: A review

Current interpretations on the in vivo response of bone to additively manufactured metallic porous scaffolds: A review

Recent advances in the field of metallic additive manufacturing have expanded production capabilities for bone implants to include porous lattice structures. While traditional models of de novo bone formation can be applied to fully dense implant materials, their applicability to the interior of porous materials has not been well-characterized. Unlike other reviews that focus on materials and mechanical properties of lattice structures, this review compiles biological performance from in vivo studies in pre-clinical models only. First, we introduce the most common lattice geometry designs employed in vivo and discuss some of their fabrication advantages and limitations. Then lattice geometry is correlated to quantitative (histomorphometric) and qualitative (histological) assessments of osseointegration. We group studies according to two common implant variables: pore size and percent porosity, and explore the extent of osseointegration using common measures, including bone-implant contact (BIC), bone area (BA), bone volume/total volume (BV/TV) and biomechanical stability, for various animal models and implantation times. Based on this, trends related to in vivo bone formation on the interior of lattice structures are presented. Common challenges with lattice structures are highlighted, including nonuniformity of bone growth through the entirety of the lattice structure due to occlusion effects and avascularity. This review paper identifies a lack of systematic in vivo studies on porous AM implants to target optimum geometric design, including pore shape, size, and percent porosity in controlled animal models and critical-sized defects. Further work focusing on surface modification strategies and systematic geometric studies to homogenize in vivo bone growth through the scaffold interior are recommended to increase implant stability in the early stages of osseointegration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信