亚历山大·达尔林普尔,珊瑚礁的效用,和查尔斯·达尔文的珊瑚礁的结构和分布。

IF 0.7 1区 哲学 Q4 BIOLOGY
Ali Mirza
{"title":"亚历山大·达尔林普尔,珊瑚礁的效用,和查尔斯·达尔文的珊瑚礁的结构和分布。","authors":"Ali Mirza","doi":"10.1007/s10739-022-09699-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper aims to establish the connection between the theoretical and practical aims of the Office of the Hydrographer of the British Admiralty and Charles Darwin's (1809-1882) work on coral reefs from 1835 to 1842. I also emphasize the consistent zoological as well as geological reasoning contained in these texts. The Office's influences have been previously overlooked, despite the Admiralty's interest in using coral reefs as natural instruments. I elaborate on this by introducing the work of Alexander Dalrymple (1737-1808), the first hydrographer of the Admiralty and a figure who has flown under the radar of the history of coral reef theories. I show that Dalrymple introduced a unified account of coral reefs in which multiple features of the coral reefs, such as their shape, slope of the sides, ridges, channels, and elevation relative to the water, were all explained by the action of the winds and waves-and proposed that one could use these features to predict seafaring conditions around the islands. Then, I show that Darwin's \"Coral Islands\" (1835) and his Coral Reefs monograph (1842) spoke to these hydrographical issues and did so, at times, by way of zoological reasoning. It was, for instance, the coral behavior and the related notion of a zoological or botanical station that ultimately proved the biggest blow to the Admiralty's aim to use the coral reefs as instruments because it eroded many uniform predictions regarding the past or future of a coral reef. Connecting these themes leads us to a surprising conclusion: that Darwin's theory of coral reefs, long a model instance of Darwin making uniform predictable inferences, was, in actuality, also his first formal encounter with something at times the entire opposite.</p>","PeriodicalId":51104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the History of Biology","volume":"55 4","pages":"827-864"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alexander Dalrymple, the Utility of Coral Reefs, and Charles Darwin's Structure and Distribution of Coral Reefs.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Mirza\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10739-022-09699-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper aims to establish the connection between the theoretical and practical aims of the Office of the Hydrographer of the British Admiralty and Charles Darwin's (1809-1882) work on coral reefs from 1835 to 1842. I also emphasize the consistent zoological as well as geological reasoning contained in these texts. The Office's influences have been previously overlooked, despite the Admiralty's interest in using coral reefs as natural instruments. I elaborate on this by introducing the work of Alexander Dalrymple (1737-1808), the first hydrographer of the Admiralty and a figure who has flown under the radar of the history of coral reef theories. I show that Dalrymple introduced a unified account of coral reefs in which multiple features of the coral reefs, such as their shape, slope of the sides, ridges, channels, and elevation relative to the water, were all explained by the action of the winds and waves-and proposed that one could use these features to predict seafaring conditions around the islands. Then, I show that Darwin's \\\"Coral Islands\\\" (1835) and his Coral Reefs monograph (1842) spoke to these hydrographical issues and did so, at times, by way of zoological reasoning. It was, for instance, the coral behavior and the related notion of a zoological or botanical station that ultimately proved the biggest blow to the Admiralty's aim to use the coral reefs as instruments because it eroded many uniform predictions regarding the past or future of a coral reef. Connecting these themes leads us to a surprising conclusion: that Darwin's theory of coral reefs, long a model instance of Darwin making uniform predictable inferences, was, in actuality, also his first formal encounter with something at times the entire opposite.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the History of Biology\",\"volume\":\"55 4\",\"pages\":\"827-864\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the History of Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-022-09699-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the History of Biology","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-022-09699-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在建立英国海军部海道测量办公室的理论和实践目标与查尔斯·达尔文(1809-1882)1835年至1842年对珊瑚礁的研究之间的联系。我还强调这些文本中所包含的一致的动物学和地质学推理。尽管海军部对利用珊瑚礁作为天然工具很感兴趣,但该办公室的影响以前一直被忽视。我通过介绍亚历山大·达尔林普尔(1737-1808)的工作来详细说明这一点,他是海军部的第一位水文测量家,也是一位在珊瑚礁理论史上默默无闻的人物。我指出,Dalrymple介绍了一种关于珊瑚礁的统一描述,其中珊瑚礁的多种特征,如它们的形状、侧面的坡度、山脊、渠道和相对于水的海拔高度,都可以通过风和海浪的作用来解释,并提出可以使用这些特征来预测岛屿周围的航海条件。然后,我指出达尔文的《珊瑚岛》(1835年)和他的《珊瑚礁》专著(1842年)谈到了这些水文问题,有时是通过动物学的推理来解决的。例如,珊瑚的行为和与之相关的动物学或植物学站的概念,最终对海军部利用珊瑚礁作为工具的目标造成了最大的打击,因为它破坏了许多关于珊瑚礁过去或未来的统一预测。把这些主题联系起来,我们会得出一个令人惊讶的结论:达尔文的珊瑚礁理论,长期以来一直是达尔文做出统一可预测推论的典范,实际上,也是他第一次正式遇到一些有时完全相反的东西。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Alexander Dalrymple, the Utility of Coral Reefs, and Charles Darwin's Structure and Distribution of Coral Reefs.

Alexander Dalrymple, the Utility of Coral Reefs, and Charles Darwin's Structure and Distribution of Coral Reefs.

This paper aims to establish the connection between the theoretical and practical aims of the Office of the Hydrographer of the British Admiralty and Charles Darwin's (1809-1882) work on coral reefs from 1835 to 1842. I also emphasize the consistent zoological as well as geological reasoning contained in these texts. The Office's influences have been previously overlooked, despite the Admiralty's interest in using coral reefs as natural instruments. I elaborate on this by introducing the work of Alexander Dalrymple (1737-1808), the first hydrographer of the Admiralty and a figure who has flown under the radar of the history of coral reef theories. I show that Dalrymple introduced a unified account of coral reefs in which multiple features of the coral reefs, such as their shape, slope of the sides, ridges, channels, and elevation relative to the water, were all explained by the action of the winds and waves-and proposed that one could use these features to predict seafaring conditions around the islands. Then, I show that Darwin's "Coral Islands" (1835) and his Coral Reefs monograph (1842) spoke to these hydrographical issues and did so, at times, by way of zoological reasoning. It was, for instance, the coral behavior and the related notion of a zoological or botanical station that ultimately proved the biggest blow to the Admiralty's aim to use the coral reefs as instruments because it eroded many uniform predictions regarding the past or future of a coral reef. Connecting these themes leads us to a surprising conclusion: that Darwin's theory of coral reefs, long a model instance of Darwin making uniform predictable inferences, was, in actuality, also his first formal encounter with something at times the entire opposite.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the History of Biology
Journal of the History of Biology 生物-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the History of Biology is devoted to the history of the life sciences, with additional interest and concern in philosophical and social issues confronting biology in its varying historical contexts. While all historical epochs are welcome, particular attention has been paid in recent years to developments during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. JHB is a recognized forum for scholarship on Darwin, but pieces that connect Darwinism with broader social and intellectual issues in the life sciences are especially encouraged. The journal serves both the working biologist who needs a full understanding of the historical and philosophical bases of the field and the historian of biology interested in following developments and making historiographical connections with the history of science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信