轻度脑卒中患者大脑中动脉动态自我调节功能因大脑前动脉而非后动脉区域梗死而受损。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Manuel Bolognese, Grzegorz Karwacki, Mareike Österreich, Martin Müller, Lehel Lakatos
{"title":"轻度脑卒中患者大脑中动脉动态自我调节功能因大脑前动脉而非后动脉区域梗死而受损。","authors":"Manuel Bolognese,&nbsp;Grzegorz Karwacki,&nbsp;Mareike Österreich,&nbsp;Martin Müller,&nbsp;Lehel Lakatos","doi":"10.1515/tnsci-2022-0278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to ascertain whether dynamic cerebral autoregulation (CA) in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) is disturbed by cerebral infarctions outside the MCA territory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We estimated transfer function parameters gain and phase from simultaneous recordings of spontaneous oscillation in blood pressure and MCA cerebral blood flow velocity in 10 consecutive patients with isolated anterior cerebral artery (ACA) infarctions and in 22 consecutive patients with isolated posterior cerebral artery (PCA) infarctions. All ACA infarctions were in the motor, premotor, or supplementary motor cortex areas and presented with pronounced leg hemiparesis. Twenty-eight age- and sex-matched healthy subjects served as controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to controls, phase was significantly reduced in the MCA ipsilateral to the lesion site and in the contralateral MCA (unaffected hemisphere) in the very low (0.02-0.07 Hz) and low (0.07-0.15 Hz) frequency ranges in the ACA infarctions but not in the PCA infarctions. Gain was reduced only in the very low frequency range in the MCA contralateral to the ACA lesion site. Systemic factors were unrelated to phase and gain results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bilateral impairment of MCA dynamic CA in patients with a unilateral ACA infarction is frequent.</p>","PeriodicalId":23227,"journal":{"name":"Translational Neuroscience","volume":"14 1","pages":"20220278"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068749/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Middle cerebral artery dynamic cerebral autoregulation is impaired by infarctions in the anterior but not the posterior cerebral artery territory in patients with mild strokes.\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Bolognese,&nbsp;Grzegorz Karwacki,&nbsp;Mareike Österreich,&nbsp;Martin Müller,&nbsp;Lehel Lakatos\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/tnsci-2022-0278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to ascertain whether dynamic cerebral autoregulation (CA) in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) is disturbed by cerebral infarctions outside the MCA territory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We estimated transfer function parameters gain and phase from simultaneous recordings of spontaneous oscillation in blood pressure and MCA cerebral blood flow velocity in 10 consecutive patients with isolated anterior cerebral artery (ACA) infarctions and in 22 consecutive patients with isolated posterior cerebral artery (PCA) infarctions. All ACA infarctions were in the motor, premotor, or supplementary motor cortex areas and presented with pronounced leg hemiparesis. Twenty-eight age- and sex-matched healthy subjects served as controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to controls, phase was significantly reduced in the MCA ipsilateral to the lesion site and in the contralateral MCA (unaffected hemisphere) in the very low (0.02-0.07 Hz) and low (0.07-0.15 Hz) frequency ranges in the ACA infarctions but not in the PCA infarctions. Gain was reduced only in the very low frequency range in the MCA contralateral to the ACA lesion site. Systemic factors were unrelated to phase and gain results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bilateral impairment of MCA dynamic CA in patients with a unilateral ACA infarction is frequent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"20220278\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068749/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/tnsci-2022-0278\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/tnsci-2022-0278","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是确定大脑中动脉(MCA)的动态脑自动调节(CA)是否受到MCA区域外脑梗死的干扰。方法:我们通过同时记录10例连续的孤立性大脑前动脉(ACA)梗死患者和22例连续的孤立性大脑后动脉(PCA)梗死患者的血压和MCA脑血流速度的自发振荡来估计传递函数参数增益和相位。所有ACA梗死均发生在运动、前运动或辅助运动皮质区,并表现为明显的腿部偏瘫。28名年龄和性别匹配的健康受试者作为对照。结果:与对照组相比,在ACA梗死的极低(0.02-0.07 Hz)和低(0.07-0.15 Hz)频率范围内,与病变部位同侧的MCA和对侧MCA(未受影响的半球)的相位显著减少,但在PCA梗死中没有。增益仅在MCA对侧ACA病变部位的极低频率范围内降低。系统因素与相位和增益结果无关。结论:单侧ACA梗死患者MCA动态CA双侧损伤发生率高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Middle cerebral artery dynamic cerebral autoregulation is impaired by infarctions in the anterior but not the posterior cerebral artery territory in patients with mild strokes.

Middle cerebral artery dynamic cerebral autoregulation is impaired by infarctions in the anterior but not the posterior cerebral artery territory in patients with mild strokes.

Middle cerebral artery dynamic cerebral autoregulation is impaired by infarctions in the anterior but not the posterior cerebral artery territory in patients with mild strokes.

Middle cerebral artery dynamic cerebral autoregulation is impaired by infarctions in the anterior but not the posterior cerebral artery territory in patients with mild strokes.

Objective: The aim of this study was to ascertain whether dynamic cerebral autoregulation (CA) in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) is disturbed by cerebral infarctions outside the MCA territory.

Methods: We estimated transfer function parameters gain and phase from simultaneous recordings of spontaneous oscillation in blood pressure and MCA cerebral blood flow velocity in 10 consecutive patients with isolated anterior cerebral artery (ACA) infarctions and in 22 consecutive patients with isolated posterior cerebral artery (PCA) infarctions. All ACA infarctions were in the motor, premotor, or supplementary motor cortex areas and presented with pronounced leg hemiparesis. Twenty-eight age- and sex-matched healthy subjects served as controls.

Results: Compared to controls, phase was significantly reduced in the MCA ipsilateral to the lesion site and in the contralateral MCA (unaffected hemisphere) in the very low (0.02-0.07 Hz) and low (0.07-0.15 Hz) frequency ranges in the ACA infarctions but not in the PCA infarctions. Gain was reduced only in the very low frequency range in the MCA contralateral to the ACA lesion site. Systemic factors were unrelated to phase and gain results.

Conclusion: Bilateral impairment of MCA dynamic CA in patients with a unilateral ACA infarction is frequent.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Neuroscience provides a closer interaction between basic and clinical neuroscientists to expand understanding of brain structure, function and disease, and translate this knowledge into clinical applications and novel therapies of nervous system disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信