食管黏膜导纳:一种诊断胃食管反流病的新技术——是否可行?

IF 2.5 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hang Viet Dao, Long Bao Hoang, Binh Phuc Nguyen, Hoa Lan Nguyen, Robert Goldberg, Jeroan Allison, Thi Minh An Dao, Tomoaki Matsumura, Long Van Dao
{"title":"食管黏膜导纳:一种诊断胃食管反流病的新技术——是否可行?","authors":"Hang Viet Dao,&nbsp;Long Bao Hoang,&nbsp;Binh Phuc Nguyen,&nbsp;Hoa Lan Nguyen,&nbsp;Robert Goldberg,&nbsp;Jeroan Allison,&nbsp;Thi Minh An Dao,&nbsp;Tomoaki Matsumura,&nbsp;Long Van Dao","doi":"10.2147/CEG.S399764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Esophageal mucosal admittance (MA) is a promising diagnostic method for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We conducted a study to describe the esophageal MA in patients with reflux symptoms and determine its diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We recruited 92 patients with ambulatory pH-impedance monitoring, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and MA measured by the tissue conductance meter. MA was measured during endoscopy at 5cm (distal esophagus) and 15cm above the Z line (middle esophagus), repeated at least five times at each position, and median MA was obtained. Afterwards, two biopsies were taken 5cm above the Z line for histopathological evaluation using the Esohisto criteria. Patients were classified as GERD or non-GERD according to the 2018 Lyon consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 43.2 years, and 42 patients were males. The most common symptoms were regurgitation (75.0%), belching (65.2%), and heartburn (46.7%). Twenty-three (32.3%) were diagnosed with GERD using the Lyon consensus, and 24 (26.1%) had esophagitis on histopathology. The median MA at the distal and middle esophagus was moderately correlated. The median MA at both positions was higher in the GERD group but only statistically significant in the middle esophagus. MA was not associated with pH-impedance parameters and esophagitis on histopathology. The diagnostic model developed using the logistic regression did not have good accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MA was not different between GERD and non-GERD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10208,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology","volume":"16 ","pages":"45-54"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e4/01/ceg-16-45.PMC10089276.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Esophageal Mucosal Admittance: A New Technique to Diagnose Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease - Is It Feasible?\",\"authors\":\"Hang Viet Dao,&nbsp;Long Bao Hoang,&nbsp;Binh Phuc Nguyen,&nbsp;Hoa Lan Nguyen,&nbsp;Robert Goldberg,&nbsp;Jeroan Allison,&nbsp;Thi Minh An Dao,&nbsp;Tomoaki Matsumura,&nbsp;Long Van Dao\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CEG.S399764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Esophageal mucosal admittance (MA) is a promising diagnostic method for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We conducted a study to describe the esophageal MA in patients with reflux symptoms and determine its diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We recruited 92 patients with ambulatory pH-impedance monitoring, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and MA measured by the tissue conductance meter. MA was measured during endoscopy at 5cm (distal esophagus) and 15cm above the Z line (middle esophagus), repeated at least five times at each position, and median MA was obtained. Afterwards, two biopsies were taken 5cm above the Z line for histopathological evaluation using the Esohisto criteria. Patients were classified as GERD or non-GERD according to the 2018 Lyon consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 43.2 years, and 42 patients were males. The most common symptoms were regurgitation (75.0%), belching (65.2%), and heartburn (46.7%). Twenty-three (32.3%) were diagnosed with GERD using the Lyon consensus, and 24 (26.1%) had esophagitis on histopathology. The median MA at the distal and middle esophagus was moderately correlated. The median MA at both positions was higher in the GERD group but only statistically significant in the middle esophagus. MA was not associated with pH-impedance parameters and esophagitis on histopathology. The diagnostic model developed using the logistic regression did not have good accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MA was not different between GERD and non-GERD patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"45-54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e4/01/ceg-16-45.PMC10089276.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S399764\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S399764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:食管黏膜导纳(MA)是一种很有前途的诊断胃食管反流病(GERD)的方法。我们进行了一项研究,描述食管MA患者的反流症状,并确定其诊断的准确性。患者和方法:我们招募了92例患者,进行了动态ph阻抗监测,上消化道内窥镜检查,并通过组织电导仪测量了MA。内镜检查时在5cm处(食管远端)和15cm处(食管中)测量MA,每个位置至少重复5次,得到中位MA。之后,在Z线以上5cm处取2个活检组织,采用eshito标准进行组织病理学评估。根据2018年里昂共识,将患者分为GERD或非GERD。结果:平均年龄43.2岁,男性42例。最常见的症状是反流(75.0%)、打嗝(65.2%)和胃灼热(46.7%)。23例(32.3%)经Lyon共识诊断为GERD, 24例(26.1%)经组织病理学检查为食管炎。食管远端和中端中位MA呈中度相关。胃食管反流组两个部位的MA中位数均较高,但仅在食管中段有统计学意义。在组织病理学上,MA与ph阻抗参数和食管炎无关。采用logistic回归建立的诊断模型精度不高。结论:胃食管反流患者与非胃食管反流患者间MA无明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Esophageal Mucosal Admittance: A New Technique to Diagnose Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease - Is It Feasible?

Esophageal Mucosal Admittance: A New Technique to Diagnose Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease - Is It Feasible?

Esophageal Mucosal Admittance: A New Technique to Diagnose Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease - Is It Feasible?

Esophageal Mucosal Admittance: A New Technique to Diagnose Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease - Is It Feasible?

Purpose: Esophageal mucosal admittance (MA) is a promising diagnostic method for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We conducted a study to describe the esophageal MA in patients with reflux symptoms and determine its diagnostic accuracy.

Patients and methods: We recruited 92 patients with ambulatory pH-impedance monitoring, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and MA measured by the tissue conductance meter. MA was measured during endoscopy at 5cm (distal esophagus) and 15cm above the Z line (middle esophagus), repeated at least five times at each position, and median MA was obtained. Afterwards, two biopsies were taken 5cm above the Z line for histopathological evaluation using the Esohisto criteria. Patients were classified as GERD or non-GERD according to the 2018 Lyon consensus.

Results: The mean age was 43.2 years, and 42 patients were males. The most common symptoms were regurgitation (75.0%), belching (65.2%), and heartburn (46.7%). Twenty-three (32.3%) were diagnosed with GERD using the Lyon consensus, and 24 (26.1%) had esophagitis on histopathology. The median MA at the distal and middle esophagus was moderately correlated. The median MA at both positions was higher in the GERD group but only statistically significant in the middle esophagus. MA was not associated with pH-impedance parameters and esophagitis on histopathology. The diagnostic model developed using the logistic regression did not have good accuracy.

Conclusion: MA was not different between GERD and non-GERD patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信