单细胞基因组测序技术在纤毛虫种系和体细胞基因组鉴定中的比较分析

IF 1.9 2区 生物学 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY
Liping Lyu , Usman Asghar , Jinyu Fu , Yunyi Gao , Xue Zhang , Saleh A. Al-Farraj , Zigui Chen , Feng Gao
{"title":"单细胞基因组测序技术在纤毛虫种系和体细胞基因组鉴定中的比较分析","authors":"Liping Lyu ,&nbsp;Usman Asghar ,&nbsp;Jinyu Fu ,&nbsp;Yunyi Gao ,&nbsp;Xue Zhang ,&nbsp;Saleh A. Al-Farraj ,&nbsp;Zigui Chen ,&nbsp;Feng Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.ejop.2023.125969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Ciliated protists contain both </span>germline<span> micronucleus (MIC) and somatic </span></span>macronucleus<span><span> (MAC) in a single cytoplasm. Programmed genome rearrangements occur in ciliates during sexual processes, and the extent of rearrangements varies dramatically among species, which lead to significant differences in genomic architectures. However, genomic sequences remain largely unknown for most ciliates due to the difficulty in culturing and in separating the germline from the somatic genome in a single cell. Single-cell whole genome amplification (WGA) has emerged as a powerful technology to characterize the genomic heterogeneity at the single-cell level. In this study, we compared two single-cell WGA, </span>multiple displacement amplification (MDA) and multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycles (MALBAC) in characterizing the germline and somatic genomes in ciliates with different genomic architectures. Our results showed that: 1) MALBAC exhibits strong amplification bias towards MAC genome while MDA shows bias towards MIC genome of ciliates with extensively fragmented MAC genome; 2) both MDA and MALBAC could amplify MAC genome more efficiently in ciliates with moderately fragmented MAC genome. Moreover, we found that more sample replicates could help to obtain more genomic data. Our work provides a reference for selecting the appropriate method to characterize germline and somatic genomes of ciliates.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":12042,"journal":{"name":"European journal of protistology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of single-cell genome sequencing techniques toward the characterization of germline and somatic genomes in ciliated protists\",\"authors\":\"Liping Lyu ,&nbsp;Usman Asghar ,&nbsp;Jinyu Fu ,&nbsp;Yunyi Gao ,&nbsp;Xue Zhang ,&nbsp;Saleh A. Al-Farraj ,&nbsp;Zigui Chen ,&nbsp;Feng Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejop.2023.125969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>Ciliated protists contain both </span>germline<span> micronucleus (MIC) and somatic </span></span>macronucleus<span><span> (MAC) in a single cytoplasm. Programmed genome rearrangements occur in ciliates during sexual processes, and the extent of rearrangements varies dramatically among species, which lead to significant differences in genomic architectures. However, genomic sequences remain largely unknown for most ciliates due to the difficulty in culturing and in separating the germline from the somatic genome in a single cell. Single-cell whole genome amplification (WGA) has emerged as a powerful technology to characterize the genomic heterogeneity at the single-cell level. In this study, we compared two single-cell WGA, </span>multiple displacement amplification (MDA) and multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycles (MALBAC) in characterizing the germline and somatic genomes in ciliates with different genomic architectures. Our results showed that: 1) MALBAC exhibits strong amplification bias towards MAC genome while MDA shows bias towards MIC genome of ciliates with extensively fragmented MAC genome; 2) both MDA and MALBAC could amplify MAC genome more efficiently in ciliates with moderately fragmented MAC genome. Moreover, we found that more sample replicates could help to obtain more genomic data. Our work provides a reference for selecting the appropriate method to characterize germline and somatic genomes of ciliates.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of protistology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of protistology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0932473923000147\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of protistology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0932473923000147","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纤毛虫在单个细胞质中同时含有种系微核(MIC)和体细胞核(MAC)。程序性基因组重排发生在纤毛虫的性过程中,并且重排的程度在不同物种之间差异很大,这导致了基因组结构的显著差异。然而,由于难以在单个细胞中培养和从体细胞基因组中分离种系,大多数纤毛虫的基因组序列在很大程度上仍然未知。单细胞全基因组扩增(WGA)已成为一种在单细胞水平上表征基因组异质性的强大技术。在这项研究中,我们比较了两种单细胞WGA,多重置换扩增(MDA)和多重退火和基于环的扩增循环(MALBAC),以表征具有不同基因组结构的纤毛虫的种系和体细胞基因组。我们的结果表明:1)在MAC基因组广泛片段化的纤毛虫中,MALBAC对MAC基因组表现出强烈的扩增偏向,而MDA对MIC基因组表现出偏向;2) MDA和MALBAC都能更有效地扩增具有中等片段化MAC基因组的纤毛虫的MAC基因组。此外,我们发现更多的样本复制可以帮助获得更多的基因组数据。我们的工作为选择合适的方法来表征纤毛虫的种系和体细胞基因组提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of single-cell genome sequencing techniques toward the characterization of germline and somatic genomes in ciliated protists

Ciliated protists contain both germline micronucleus (MIC) and somatic macronucleus (MAC) in a single cytoplasm. Programmed genome rearrangements occur in ciliates during sexual processes, and the extent of rearrangements varies dramatically among species, which lead to significant differences in genomic architectures. However, genomic sequences remain largely unknown for most ciliates due to the difficulty in culturing and in separating the germline from the somatic genome in a single cell. Single-cell whole genome amplification (WGA) has emerged as a powerful technology to characterize the genomic heterogeneity at the single-cell level. In this study, we compared two single-cell WGA, multiple displacement amplification (MDA) and multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycles (MALBAC) in characterizing the germline and somatic genomes in ciliates with different genomic architectures. Our results showed that: 1) MALBAC exhibits strong amplification bias towards MAC genome while MDA shows bias towards MIC genome of ciliates with extensively fragmented MAC genome; 2) both MDA and MALBAC could amplify MAC genome more efficiently in ciliates with moderately fragmented MAC genome. Moreover, we found that more sample replicates could help to obtain more genomic data. Our work provides a reference for selecting the appropriate method to characterize germline and somatic genomes of ciliates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European journal of protistology
European journal of protistology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
20.70%
发文量
55
审稿时长
14.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles deal with protists, unicellular organisms encountered free-living in various habitats or as parasites or used in basic research or applications. The European Journal of Protistology covers topics such as the structure and systematics of protists, their development, ecology, molecular biology and physiology. Beside publishing original articles the journal offers a forum for announcing scientific meetings. Reviews of recently published books are included as well. With its diversity of topics, the European Journal of Protistology is an essential source of information for every active protistologist and for biologists of various fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信