评估三级药物资源对三环类抗抑郁药和草药补充剂之间药物相互作用的一致性。

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of Pharmacy Technology Pub Date : 2023-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-23 DOI:10.1177/87551225231154405
Elizabeth Engel, Carter T Friedt, Justin P Reinert
{"title":"评估三级药物资源对三环类抗抑郁药和草药补充剂之间药物相互作用的一致性。","authors":"Elizabeth Engel, Carter T Friedt, Justin P Reinert","doi":"10.1177/87551225231154405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Tertiary drug information resources are utilized frequently by health care providers. While pharmacists are uniquely trained and prepared to interpret the information available on these resources, including the results of drug-drug interaction evaluations, discrepancies between such resources pose a major concern for clinicians with regard to patient safety and medication regimen efficacy. It was postulated that drug-drug interaction evaluations between prescription medications and over-the-counter herbal supplements would be particularly problematic. <b>Objective:</b> The objective of this project was to distinguish the discrepancies between tertiary drug information resources in the setting of drug-drug interactions between tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and herbal supplements. <b>Methods:</b> The following medications and herbal supplements were evaluated on Lexicomp, Micromedex, and Medscape: amitriptyline, nortriptyline, doxepin, imipramine, desipramine, amoxapine, St. John's Wort, valerian root, ginkgo biloba, and ginseng. <b>Results:</b> While all of the tertiary drug information resources identified a significant reaction between each TCA and St. John's Wort due to the risk of serotonin syndrome, several other discrepancies were noted, with regard to both the severity of the interaction indicated and whether or not an interaction was identified. <b>Conclusion:</b> It is imperative that clinicians be aware of potential discrepancies between tertiary drug information resources, including the potential for variation in both the clinical interpretation of its severity and the recognition of an interaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084409/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Evaluation of Tertiary Drug Resources' Consistency Regarding Drug-Drug Interactions Between Tricyclic Antidepressants and Herbal Supplements.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Engel, Carter T Friedt, Justin P Reinert\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/87551225231154405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Tertiary drug information resources are utilized frequently by health care providers. While pharmacists are uniquely trained and prepared to interpret the information available on these resources, including the results of drug-drug interaction evaluations, discrepancies between such resources pose a major concern for clinicians with regard to patient safety and medication regimen efficacy. It was postulated that drug-drug interaction evaluations between prescription medications and over-the-counter herbal supplements would be particularly problematic. <b>Objective:</b> The objective of this project was to distinguish the discrepancies between tertiary drug information resources in the setting of drug-drug interactions between tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and herbal supplements. <b>Methods:</b> The following medications and herbal supplements were evaluated on Lexicomp, Micromedex, and Medscape: amitriptyline, nortriptyline, doxepin, imipramine, desipramine, amoxapine, St. John's Wort, valerian root, ginkgo biloba, and ginseng. <b>Results:</b> While all of the tertiary drug information resources identified a significant reaction between each TCA and St. John's Wort due to the risk of serotonin syndrome, several other discrepancies were noted, with regard to both the severity of the interaction indicated and whether or not an interaction was identified. <b>Conclusion:</b> It is imperative that clinicians be aware of potential discrepancies between tertiary drug information resources, including the potential for variation in both the clinical interpretation of its severity and the recognition of an interaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084409/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225231154405\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225231154405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医疗服务提供者经常使用三级药物信息资源。虽然药剂师在解读这些资源中的信息(包括药物相互作用的评估结果)方面训练有素、准备充分,但这些资源之间的差异仍是临床医生在患者安全和用药疗效方面的一大担忧。据推测,处方药与非处方药草药补充剂之间的药物相互作用评价尤其容易出现问题。目标:本项目旨在区分三级药物信息资源在三环类抗抑郁药(TCA)与草药补充剂之间药物相互作用方面的差异。研究方法在 Lexicomp、Micromedex 和 Medscape 上对以下药物和草药补充剂进行了评估:阿米替林、去甲替林、多虑平、丙咪嗪、地西帕明、阿莫沙平、圣约翰草、缬草根、银杏叶和人参。结果:虽然所有的三级药物信息资源都确定了每种 TCA 与圣约翰草之间会因血清素综合征的风险而产生明显的反应,但也注意到了其他一些差异,包括所显示的相互作用的严重程度以及是否确定了相互作用。结论临床医生必须意识到三级药物信息资源之间可能存在的差异,包括对其严重性的临床解释和相互作用的识别可能存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Evaluation of Tertiary Drug Resources' Consistency Regarding Drug-Drug Interactions Between Tricyclic Antidepressants and Herbal Supplements.

Background: Tertiary drug information resources are utilized frequently by health care providers. While pharmacists are uniquely trained and prepared to interpret the information available on these resources, including the results of drug-drug interaction evaluations, discrepancies between such resources pose a major concern for clinicians with regard to patient safety and medication regimen efficacy. It was postulated that drug-drug interaction evaluations between prescription medications and over-the-counter herbal supplements would be particularly problematic. Objective: The objective of this project was to distinguish the discrepancies between tertiary drug information resources in the setting of drug-drug interactions between tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and herbal supplements. Methods: The following medications and herbal supplements were evaluated on Lexicomp, Micromedex, and Medscape: amitriptyline, nortriptyline, doxepin, imipramine, desipramine, amoxapine, St. John's Wort, valerian root, ginkgo biloba, and ginseng. Results: While all of the tertiary drug information resources identified a significant reaction between each TCA and St. John's Wort due to the risk of serotonin syndrome, several other discrepancies were noted, with regard to both the severity of the interaction indicated and whether or not an interaction was identified. Conclusion: It is imperative that clinicians be aware of potential discrepancies between tertiary drug information resources, including the potential for variation in both the clinical interpretation of its severity and the recognition of an interaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信