咪达唑仑与异丙酚输注抑制严重创伤性脑损伤患者应激反应的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。

Q3 Medicine
Mallikarjun Kurni, Narender Kaloria, Amarjyoti Hazarika, Kajal Jain, Sunil Kumar Gupta, Rama Walia
{"title":"咪达唑仑与异丙酚输注抑制严重创伤性脑损伤患者应激反应的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。","authors":"Mallikarjun Kurni, Narender Kaloria, Amarjyoti Hazarika, Kajal Jain, Sunil Kumar Gupta, Rama Walia","doi":"10.13004/kjnt.2023.19.e4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective The stress response following traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a preventable cause of secondary brain injury. This can be prevented using sedation in the intensive care unit (ICU). To date, the choice of sedative agent for preventing stress response is not well-studied in literature. Methods This prospective randomized controlled trial included 60 patients with severe TBI admitted to ICU. The patients were randomized into 2 study groups according to the choice of sedation: propofol (group I) and midazolam infusion (group II). The serum cortisol was measured as the primary outcome at admission to ICU and 48 hours following sedation infusion. The baseline Glasgow coma scale, hemodynamic, optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), and computed tomography scan findings were noted at admission. Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) was measured as a neurological outcome at discharge from ICU. Results There was a statistically significant reduction in serum cortisol level in both the study groups (Δ cortisol, p-value=134.91 (50.5,208.2), 0.00 and 118.8 (42.6,160.4), 0.00, in group I and II, respectively). Serum cortisol levels were comparable among both groups at baseline and 48 hours. Similarly, there was a statistically significant difference in ONSD in both groups, but there was no difference in ONSD value between the groups at 48 hours. The GOS was also similar in both groups at discharge from ICU. Conclusion The study demonstrated a similar reduction in serum cortisol levels following 48 hours of propofol or midazolam infusion in patients with severe TBI.","PeriodicalId":36879,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Neurotrauma","volume":"19 1","pages":"70-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/75/ad/kjn-19-70.PMC10083446.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Midazolam and Propofol Infusion to Suppress Stress Response in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mallikarjun Kurni, Narender Kaloria, Amarjyoti Hazarika, Kajal Jain, Sunil Kumar Gupta, Rama Walia\",\"doi\":\"10.13004/kjnt.2023.19.e4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective The stress response following traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a preventable cause of secondary brain injury. This can be prevented using sedation in the intensive care unit (ICU). To date, the choice of sedative agent for preventing stress response is not well-studied in literature. Methods This prospective randomized controlled trial included 60 patients with severe TBI admitted to ICU. The patients were randomized into 2 study groups according to the choice of sedation: propofol (group I) and midazolam infusion (group II). The serum cortisol was measured as the primary outcome at admission to ICU and 48 hours following sedation infusion. The baseline Glasgow coma scale, hemodynamic, optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), and computed tomography scan findings were noted at admission. Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) was measured as a neurological outcome at discharge from ICU. Results There was a statistically significant reduction in serum cortisol level in both the study groups (Δ cortisol, p-value=134.91 (50.5,208.2), 0.00 and 118.8 (42.6,160.4), 0.00, in group I and II, respectively). Serum cortisol levels were comparable among both groups at baseline and 48 hours. Similarly, there was a statistically significant difference in ONSD in both groups, but there was no difference in ONSD value between the groups at 48 hours. The GOS was also similar in both groups at discharge from ICU. Conclusion The study demonstrated a similar reduction in serum cortisol levels following 48 hours of propofol or midazolam infusion in patients with severe TBI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Neurotrauma\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"70-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/75/ad/kjn-19-70.PMC10083446.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Neurotrauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2023.19.e4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2023.19.e4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后的应激反应是可预防的继发性脑损伤原因。这可以在重症监护病房(ICU)使用镇静来预防。迄今为止,文献中对预防应激反应的镇静剂的选择还没有很好的研究。方法:本前瞻性随机对照试验纳入60例重症脑外伤患者。根据镇静的选择将患者随机分为2个研究组:异丙酚组(I组)和咪达唑仑组(II组)。在ICU入院时和镇静输注后48小时测定血清皮质醇作为主要指标。入院时记录基线格拉斯哥昏迷评分、血流动力学、视神经鞘直径(ONSD)和计算机断层扫描结果。格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)作为从ICU出院时的神经预后进行测量。结果:两组患者血清皮质醇水平降低均有统计学意义(Δ皮质醇,p值分别为134.91(50.5208.2)、0.00和118.8(42.6160.4)、0.00,ⅰ组和ⅱ组)。两组在基线和48小时时血清皮质醇水平具有可比性。同样,两组患者的ONSD值差异有统计学意义,但48小时时两组间的ONSD值无差异。两组出院时GOS也相似。结论:该研究表明,在严重TBI患者输注异丙酚或咪达唑仑48小时后,血清皮质醇水平有类似的降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of Midazolam and Propofol Infusion to Suppress Stress Response in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Comparison of Midazolam and Propofol Infusion to Suppress Stress Response in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Comparison of Midazolam and Propofol Infusion to Suppress Stress Response in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Comparison of Midazolam and Propofol Infusion to Suppress Stress Response in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Objective The stress response following traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a preventable cause of secondary brain injury. This can be prevented using sedation in the intensive care unit (ICU). To date, the choice of sedative agent for preventing stress response is not well-studied in literature. Methods This prospective randomized controlled trial included 60 patients with severe TBI admitted to ICU. The patients were randomized into 2 study groups according to the choice of sedation: propofol (group I) and midazolam infusion (group II). The serum cortisol was measured as the primary outcome at admission to ICU and 48 hours following sedation infusion. The baseline Glasgow coma scale, hemodynamic, optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), and computed tomography scan findings were noted at admission. Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) was measured as a neurological outcome at discharge from ICU. Results There was a statistically significant reduction in serum cortisol level in both the study groups (Δ cortisol, p-value=134.91 (50.5,208.2), 0.00 and 118.8 (42.6,160.4), 0.00, in group I and II, respectively). Serum cortisol levels were comparable among both groups at baseline and 48 hours. Similarly, there was a statistically significant difference in ONSD in both groups, but there was no difference in ONSD value between the groups at 48 hours. The GOS was also similar in both groups at discharge from ICU. Conclusion The study demonstrated a similar reduction in serum cortisol levels following 48 hours of propofol or midazolam infusion in patients with severe TBI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信