教育教学对医学生模拟病人表现的影响。

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Logan D Glosser, Conner V Lombardi, Wade A Hopper, Yixing Chen, Alexander N Young, Elliott Oberneder, Sprio Veria, Benjamin A Talbot, Shirley M Bodi, Coral D Matus
{"title":"教育教学对医学生模拟病人表现的影响。","authors":"Logan D Glosser,&nbsp;Conner V Lombardi,&nbsp;Wade A Hopper,&nbsp;Yixing Chen,&nbsp;Alexander N Young,&nbsp;Elliott Oberneder,&nbsp;Sprio Veria,&nbsp;Benjamin A Talbot,&nbsp;Shirley M Bodi,&nbsp;Coral D Matus","doi":"10.5116/ijme.62a5.96bf","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effects, and timing of, a video educational intervention on medical student performance in manikin-based simulation patient encounters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective mixed-methods study was conducted as part of the University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences undergraduate medical curriculum. One hundred sixty-six students second-year students participated in two simulations on a single day in September 2021. A 7-minute video intervention outlining the clinical diagnostic approach to pulmonary complaints was implemented. Students were randomized into 32 groups which were divided into two cohorts. One received the video prior to simulation-1 (n=83) and the other between simulation-1 and simulation-2 (n=83). Each simulation was recorded and assessed using a 44-point standardized checklist. Comparative analysis to determine differences in performance scores was performed using independent t-tests and paired t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Independent t-tests revealed the video-prior cohort performed better in simulation-1 (t<sub>(30)</sub>= 2.27, p= .03), however in simulation-2 no significant difference was observed between the cohorts. Paired t-test analysis revealed the video-between cohort had significant improvement from simulation-1 to simulation-2 (t<sub>(15)</sub>= 3.06, p = .01); no significant difference was found for the video-prior cohort. Less prompting was seen in simulation-2 among both the video-prior (t<sub>(15)</sub>= -2.83, p= .01) and video-between cohorts (t<sub>(15)</sub>= -2.18, p= .04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Simulation training, and targeted educational interventions, facilitate medical students to become clinically competent practitioners. Our findings indicate that guided video instruction advances students' clinical performance greater than learning through simulation alone. To confirm these findings, similar investigations in other clinical training exercises should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":14029,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9911140/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of educational instruction on medical student performance in simulation patient.\",\"authors\":\"Logan D Glosser,&nbsp;Conner V Lombardi,&nbsp;Wade A Hopper,&nbsp;Yixing Chen,&nbsp;Alexander N Young,&nbsp;Elliott Oberneder,&nbsp;Sprio Veria,&nbsp;Benjamin A Talbot,&nbsp;Shirley M Bodi,&nbsp;Coral D Matus\",\"doi\":\"10.5116/ijme.62a5.96bf\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effects, and timing of, a video educational intervention on medical student performance in manikin-based simulation patient encounters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective mixed-methods study was conducted as part of the University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences undergraduate medical curriculum. One hundred sixty-six students second-year students participated in two simulations on a single day in September 2021. A 7-minute video intervention outlining the clinical diagnostic approach to pulmonary complaints was implemented. Students were randomized into 32 groups which were divided into two cohorts. One received the video prior to simulation-1 (n=83) and the other between simulation-1 and simulation-2 (n=83). Each simulation was recorded and assessed using a 44-point standardized checklist. Comparative analysis to determine differences in performance scores was performed using independent t-tests and paired t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Independent t-tests revealed the video-prior cohort performed better in simulation-1 (t<sub>(30)</sub>= 2.27, p= .03), however in simulation-2 no significant difference was observed between the cohorts. Paired t-test analysis revealed the video-between cohort had significant improvement from simulation-1 to simulation-2 (t<sub>(15)</sub>= 3.06, p = .01); no significant difference was found for the video-prior cohort. Less prompting was seen in simulation-2 among both the video-prior (t<sub>(15)</sub>= -2.83, p= .01) and video-between cohorts (t<sub>(15)</sub>= -2.18, p= .04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Simulation training, and targeted educational interventions, facilitate medical students to become clinically competent practitioners. Our findings indicate that guided video instruction advances students' clinical performance greater than learning through simulation alone. To confirm these findings, similar investigations in other clinical training exercises should be considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Medical Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9911140/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.62a5.96bf\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.62a5.96bf","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估视频教育干预对医学生在基于人体模型的模拟病人接触中的表现的效果和时机。方法:这项前瞻性混合方法研究是托莱多大学医学与生命科学学院本科医学课程的一部分。2021年9月,166名二年级学生在一天内参加了两次模拟。一段7分钟的视频干预,概述了肺部疾病的临床诊断方法。学生被随机分为32组,分为两组。一组在模拟1之前观看视频(n=83),另一组在模拟1和模拟2之间观看视频(n=83)。每个模拟都被记录下来,并使用一个44分的标准化检查表进行评估。采用独立t检验和配对t检验进行比较分析,以确定性能分数的差异。结果:独立t检验显示,视频先验队列在模拟1中表现更好(t(30)= 2.27, p= .03),但在模拟2中,队列之间没有观察到显著差异。配对t检验分析显示,video-between队列从模拟1到模拟2有显著改善(t(15)= 3.06, p = 0.01);在视频先验队列中没有发现显著差异。在模拟-2中,视频先验队列(t(15)= -2.83, p= 0.01)和视频间隔队列(t(15)= -2.18, p= 0.04)的提示都较少。结论:模拟训练和有针对性的教育干预有利于医学生成为临床合格的执业医师。我们的研究结果表明,有指导的视频教学比单独通过模拟学习更能提高学生的临床表现。为了证实这些发现,应该考虑在其他临床训练练习中进行类似的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of educational instruction on medical student performance in simulation patient.

Impact of educational instruction on medical student performance in simulation patient.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effects, and timing of, a video educational intervention on medical student performance in manikin-based simulation patient encounters.

Methods: This prospective mixed-methods study was conducted as part of the University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences undergraduate medical curriculum. One hundred sixty-six students second-year students participated in two simulations on a single day in September 2021. A 7-minute video intervention outlining the clinical diagnostic approach to pulmonary complaints was implemented. Students were randomized into 32 groups which were divided into two cohorts. One received the video prior to simulation-1 (n=83) and the other between simulation-1 and simulation-2 (n=83). Each simulation was recorded and assessed using a 44-point standardized checklist. Comparative analysis to determine differences in performance scores was performed using independent t-tests and paired t-tests.

Results: Independent t-tests revealed the video-prior cohort performed better in simulation-1 (t(30)= 2.27, p= .03), however in simulation-2 no significant difference was observed between the cohorts. Paired t-test analysis revealed the video-between cohort had significant improvement from simulation-1 to simulation-2 (t(15)= 3.06, p = .01); no significant difference was found for the video-prior cohort. Less prompting was seen in simulation-2 among both the video-prior (t(15)= -2.83, p= .01) and video-between cohorts (t(15)= -2.18, p= .04).

Conclusions: Simulation training, and targeted educational interventions, facilitate medical students to become clinically competent practitioners. Our findings indicate that guided video instruction advances students' clinical performance greater than learning through simulation alone. To confirm these findings, similar investigations in other clinical training exercises should be considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Education
International Journal of Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信