对第二波COVID-19大流行应对的整个医疗系统死亡率进行审查,是否吸取了教训?

Q3 Medicine
Acute Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.52964/AMJA.0932
Jeremy W Tankel, David Ratcliffe, Martin Smith, Clare Hindley, Andrew Mullarkey, Dee Waterhouse, Andrea Riley, Darren Green
{"title":"对第二波COVID-19大流行应对的整个医疗系统死亡率进行审查,是否吸取了教训?","authors":"Jeremy W Tankel,&nbsp;David Ratcliffe,&nbsp;Martin Smith,&nbsp;Clare Hindley,&nbsp;Andrew Mullarkey,&nbsp;Dee Waterhouse,&nbsp;Andrea Riley,&nbsp;Darren Green","doi":"10.52964/AMJA.0932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We previously reported a study of features of emergency healthcare response to COVID-19 that could be modified to mitigate against future excess deaths. Here we determined what themes persisted in later waves. This was an expert panel review of all components of care delivered to COVID-19 patients who died (primary and secondary care, community services, NHS 111 and 999, COVID oximetry at home, virtual wards). 174 deaths were included. 5% were deemed >50% avoidable, 75% included avoidability themes. Contact with primary care remains mostly via telephone, creating diagnostic risk. Patient decision to avoid healthcare contact was common. Recommendations include: better utilisation of home monitoring in future pandemics; improved avoidance of nosocomial spread; patients be encouraged to seek medical advice earlier.</p>","PeriodicalId":39743,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine","volume":"22 1","pages":"39-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A whole healthcare system mortality review of the second wave COVID-19 pandemic response, were lessons learned?\",\"authors\":\"Jeremy W Tankel,&nbsp;David Ratcliffe,&nbsp;Martin Smith,&nbsp;Clare Hindley,&nbsp;Andrew Mullarkey,&nbsp;Dee Waterhouse,&nbsp;Andrea Riley,&nbsp;Darren Green\",\"doi\":\"10.52964/AMJA.0932\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We previously reported a study of features of emergency healthcare response to COVID-19 that could be modified to mitigate against future excess deaths. Here we determined what themes persisted in later waves. This was an expert panel review of all components of care delivered to COVID-19 patients who died (primary and secondary care, community services, NHS 111 and 999, COVID oximetry at home, virtual wards). 174 deaths were included. 5% were deemed >50% avoidable, 75% included avoidability themes. Contact with primary care remains mostly via telephone, creating diagnostic risk. Patient decision to avoid healthcare contact was common. Recommendations include: better utilisation of home monitoring in future pandemics; improved avoidance of nosocomial spread; patients be encouraged to seek medical advice earlier.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acute Medicine\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"39-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acute Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52964/AMJA.0932\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52964/AMJA.0932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们之前报道了一项关于COVID-19紧急医疗响应特征的研究,这些特征可以进行修改,以减轻未来的额外死亡。在这里,我们确定了在后来的浪潮中持续存在的主题。这是对向死亡的COVID-19患者提供护理的所有组成部分(初级和二级保健、社区服务、NHS 111和999、家中COVID血氧测定、虚拟病房)的专家小组审查。其中包括174例死亡。5%认为>50%是可避免的,75%包括可避免的主题。与初级保健的联系仍然主要通过电话,造成诊断风险。患者决定避免医疗接触是很常见的。建议包括:在未来的大流行中更好地利用家庭监测;更好地避免院内传播;鼓励病人及早求医。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A whole healthcare system mortality review of the second wave COVID-19 pandemic response, were lessons learned?

We previously reported a study of features of emergency healthcare response to COVID-19 that could be modified to mitigate against future excess deaths. Here we determined what themes persisted in later waves. This was an expert panel review of all components of care delivered to COVID-19 patients who died (primary and secondary care, community services, NHS 111 and 999, COVID oximetry at home, virtual wards). 174 deaths were included. 5% were deemed >50% avoidable, 75% included avoidability themes. Contact with primary care remains mostly via telephone, creating diagnostic risk. Patient decision to avoid healthcare contact was common. Recommendations include: better utilisation of home monitoring in future pandemics; improved avoidance of nosocomial spread; patients be encouraged to seek medical advice earlier.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acute Medicine
Acute Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: These are usually commissioned by the editorial team in accordance with a cycle running over several years. Authors wishing to submit a review relevant to Acute Medicine are advised to contact the editor before writing this. Unsolicited review articles received for consideration may be included if the subject matter is considered of interest to the readership, provided the topic has not already been covered in a recent edition. Review articles are usually 3000-5000 words and may include tables, pictures and other figures as required for the text. Include 3 or 4 ‘key points’ summarising the main teaching messages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信