Chapitre 4。是时候建立植物生物伦理学了吗?

Amir Muzur, Iva Rinčić
{"title":"Chapitre 4。是时候建立植物生物伦理学了吗?","authors":"Amir Muzur,&nbsp;Iva Rinčić","doi":"10.54695/jibes.333.0053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As early as 1926, Fritz Jahr suggested the broadening of Kant&#8217;s Categorical Imperative onto all living beings. And while, at that time, Jahr&#8217;s animal ethics could have been built upon Ignaz Bregenzer and other scientifically accepted sources, Jahr&#8217;s ideas on plant ethics must have relied only on more poetical and philosophical conjectures, like the ones by Richard Wagner, Hans Christian Andersen, or Eduard von Hartmann. Today, we have accummulated certain knowledge about plant physiology, proving the complexity of plant cognition and feeling. Ten years ago, the &#8220;Rheinauer Theses on the Rights of Plants&#8221; once again provoked discussion, eventually supported by Monica Gagliano, Stefano Mancuso, and other biologists advocating the redefinition of human relation toward plants. In the present paper, we intend to review those arguments, but also to examine whether our ethics should be based upon our knowledge only.</p>","PeriodicalId":73577,"journal":{"name":"Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chapitre 4. Is it time for a plant bioethics?\",\"authors\":\"Amir Muzur,&nbsp;Iva Rinčić\",\"doi\":\"10.54695/jibes.333.0053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As early as 1926, Fritz Jahr suggested the broadening of Kant&#8217;s Categorical Imperative onto all living beings. And while, at that time, Jahr&#8217;s animal ethics could have been built upon Ignaz Bregenzer and other scientifically accepted sources, Jahr&#8217;s ideas on plant ethics must have relied only on more poetical and philosophical conjectures, like the ones by Richard Wagner, Hans Christian Andersen, or Eduard von Hartmann. Today, we have accummulated certain knowledge about plant physiology, proving the complexity of plant cognition and feeling. Ten years ago, the &#8220;Rheinauer Theses on the Rights of Plants&#8221; once again provoked discussion, eventually supported by Monica Gagliano, Stefano Mancuso, and other biologists advocating the redefinition of human relation toward plants. In the present paper, we intend to review those arguments, but also to examine whether our ethics should be based upon our knowledge only.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54695/jibes.333.0053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54695/jibes.333.0053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

早在1926年,弗里茨·雅尔就建议将康德的定言令式扩展到一切生物。当时,雅尔的动物伦理学可以建立在伊格纳兹·布雷根泽和其他科学上公认的资料的基础上,而雅尔关于植物伦理学的思想却只能依赖于更富有诗意和哲学意义的猜想,比如理查德·瓦格纳、汉斯·克里斯蒂安·安徒生或爱德华·冯·哈特曼的猜想。今天,我们已经积累了一定的植物生理学知识,证明了植物认知和感觉的复杂性。十年前,《莱茵瑙尔关于植物权利的论文》(”这再次引发了讨论,最终得到了莫妮卡·加利亚诺、斯特凡诺·曼库索和其他生物学家的支持,他们主张重新定义人类与植物的关系。在本文中,我们打算回顾这些论点,但也检查我们的伦理是否应该只基于我们的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chapitre 4. Is it time for a plant bioethics?

As early as 1926, Fritz Jahr suggested the broadening of Kant’s Categorical Imperative onto all living beings. And while, at that time, Jahr’s animal ethics could have been built upon Ignaz Bregenzer and other scientifically accepted sources, Jahr’s ideas on plant ethics must have relied only on more poetical and philosophical conjectures, like the ones by Richard Wagner, Hans Christian Andersen, or Eduard von Hartmann. Today, we have accummulated certain knowledge about plant physiology, proving the complexity of plant cognition and feeling. Ten years ago, the “Rheinauer Theses on the Rights of Plants” once again provoked discussion, eventually supported by Monica Gagliano, Stefano Mancuso, and other biologists advocating the redefinition of human relation toward plants. In the present paper, we intend to review those arguments, but also to examine whether our ethics should be based upon our knowledge only.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信