评估猫(Felis catus)对人类手势的敏感度。

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Margaret Mäses, Claudia A F Wascher
{"title":"评估猫(Felis catus)对人类手势的敏感度。","authors":"Margaret Mäses,&nbsp;Claudia A F Wascher","doi":"10.1037/com0000338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A wide range of nonhuman animal species has been shown to be able to respond to human referential signals, such as pointing gestures. The aim of the present study was to replicate previous findings showing cats to be sensitive to human pointing cues (Miklósi et al., 2005). In our study, we presented two types of human pointing gestures-momentary ipsilateral (direct pointing) and momentary cross-body pointing. We tested nine rescue cats in a two-way object-choice task. On a group level, the success rate of cats was 74.4%. Cats performed significantly above chance level in both the ipsilateral and cross-body pointing conditions. Trial number, rewarded side, and type of gesture did not significantly affect the cats' performances in the experiment. On an individual level, five out of seven cats who completed 20 trials performed significantly above chance level. Two cats only completed 10 trials. One of them succeeded in eight and the other in six of these trials. The results of our study replicate previous findings of cats being responsive to human ipsilateral pointing cues and add additional knowledge about their ability to follow cross-body pointing cues. Our results highlight that a domestic species, socialized in a group setting, may possess heterospecific communication skills. Further research is needed to exclude alternative parsimonious explanations, such as local and stimulus enhancements. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing cats' (Felis catus) sensitivity to human pointing gestures.\",\"authors\":\"Margaret Mäses,&nbsp;Claudia A F Wascher\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/com0000338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A wide range of nonhuman animal species has been shown to be able to respond to human referential signals, such as pointing gestures. The aim of the present study was to replicate previous findings showing cats to be sensitive to human pointing cues (Miklósi et al., 2005). In our study, we presented two types of human pointing gestures-momentary ipsilateral (direct pointing) and momentary cross-body pointing. We tested nine rescue cats in a two-way object-choice task. On a group level, the success rate of cats was 74.4%. Cats performed significantly above chance level in both the ipsilateral and cross-body pointing conditions. Trial number, rewarded side, and type of gesture did not significantly affect the cats' performances in the experiment. On an individual level, five out of seven cats who completed 20 trials performed significantly above chance level. Two cats only completed 10 trials. One of them succeeded in eight and the other in six of these trials. The results of our study replicate previous findings of cats being responsive to human ipsilateral pointing cues and add additional knowledge about their ability to follow cross-body pointing cues. Our results highlight that a domestic species, socialized in a group setting, may possess heterospecific communication skills. Further research is needed to exclude alternative parsimonious explanations, such as local and stimulus enhancements. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Comparative Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Comparative Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000338\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000338","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多非人类的动物物种已经被证明能够对人类的参考信号做出反应,比如指向的手势。本研究的目的是重复先前的研究结果,即猫对人类的指示线索很敏感(Miklósi et al., 2005)。在我们的研究中,我们提出了两种类型的人类指向手势-瞬间同侧(直接指向)和瞬间跨体指向。我们在一个双向对象选择任务中测试了九只救援猫。在群体层面上,猫的成功率为74.4%。猫在同侧和跨体指向条件下的表现明显高于机会水平。试验次数、奖励方和手势类型对猫在实验中的表现没有显著影响。在个体层面上,完成20次试验的7只猫中有5只的表现明显高于概率水平。两只猫只完成了10次试验。其中一个在8次试验中成功,另一个在6次试验中成功。我们的研究结果重复了先前的发现,即猫对人类同侧指向线索有反应,并增加了关于它们遵循跨体指向线索的能力的额外知识。我们的研究结果强调,在群体环境中社会化的家养物种可能具有异种的沟通技巧。需要进一步的研究来排除其他的简约解释,比如局部和刺激增强。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing cats' (Felis catus) sensitivity to human pointing gestures.

A wide range of nonhuman animal species has been shown to be able to respond to human referential signals, such as pointing gestures. The aim of the present study was to replicate previous findings showing cats to be sensitive to human pointing cues (Miklósi et al., 2005). In our study, we presented two types of human pointing gestures-momentary ipsilateral (direct pointing) and momentary cross-body pointing. We tested nine rescue cats in a two-way object-choice task. On a group level, the success rate of cats was 74.4%. Cats performed significantly above chance level in both the ipsilateral and cross-body pointing conditions. Trial number, rewarded side, and type of gesture did not significantly affect the cats' performances in the experiment. On an individual level, five out of seven cats who completed 20 trials performed significantly above chance level. Two cats only completed 10 trials. One of them succeeded in eight and the other in six of these trials. The results of our study replicate previous findings of cats being responsive to human ipsilateral pointing cues and add additional knowledge about their ability to follow cross-body pointing cues. Our results highlight that a domestic species, socialized in a group setting, may possess heterospecific communication skills. Further research is needed to exclude alternative parsimonious explanations, such as local and stimulus enhancements. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Comparative Psychology publishes original research from a comparative perspective on the behavior, cognition, perception, and social relationships of diverse species.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信