血象来源比率在初级卫生保健机构COVID-19严重程度分层中的作用

Q2 Medicine
Sabina Segalo, Emina Kiseljakovic, Emsel Papic, Anes Joguncic, Aleksandra Pasic, Mubera Sahinagic, Orhan Lepara, Lutvo Sporisevic
{"title":"血象来源比率在初级卫生保健机构COVID-19严重程度分层中的作用","authors":"Sabina Segalo,&nbsp;Emina Kiseljakovic,&nbsp;Emsel Papic,&nbsp;Anes Joguncic,&nbsp;Aleksandra Pasic,&nbsp;Mubera Sahinagic,&nbsp;Orhan Lepara,&nbsp;Lutvo Sporisevic","doi":"10.5455/aim.2023.31.41-47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can cause a wide clinical spectrum, ranging from asymptomatic to severe disease with a high mortality rate. In view of the current pandemic and the increasing influx of patients into healthcare facilities, there is a need to identify simple and reliable tools for stratifying patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Study aimed to analyze whether hemogram-derived ratios (HDRs) can be used to identify patients with a risk of developing a severe clinical form and admission to hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional and observational study included 500 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. Data on clinical features and laboratory parameters were collected from medical records and 13 HDRs were calculated and analyzed. Descriptive and inferential statistics were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 500 patients, 43.8% had a severe form of the disease. Lymphocytopenia, monocytopenia, higher C-reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were found in severe patients (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Significantly higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived NLR (dNLR), neutrophil-to-platelet ratio (NPR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-to-platelet ratio (NLPR) and CRP-to-lymphocyte ratio (CRP/Ly) values were found in severe patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In addition, they have statistically significant prognostic potential (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) for CRP/Ly, dNLR, NLPR, NLR, and NPR were 0.693, 0.619, 0.619, 0.616, and 0.603, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity were 65.7% and 65.6% for CRP/Ly, 51.6% and 70.8 for dNLR, 61.6% and 57.3% for NLPR, 40.6% and 80.4% for NLR, and 48.8% and 69.1% for NPR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the study suggest that NLR, dNLR, CRP/Ly, NPR, and NLPR can be considered as potentially useful markers for stratifying patients with a severe form of the disease. HDRs derived from routine blood tests results should be included in common laboratory practice since they are readily available, easy to calculate, and inexpensive.</p>","PeriodicalId":7074,"journal":{"name":"Acta Informatica Medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d8/84/AIM-31-41.PMC10082658.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Hemogram-derived Ratios in COVID-19 Severity Stratification in a Primary Healthcare Facility.\",\"authors\":\"Sabina Segalo,&nbsp;Emina Kiseljakovic,&nbsp;Emsel Papic,&nbsp;Anes Joguncic,&nbsp;Aleksandra Pasic,&nbsp;Mubera Sahinagic,&nbsp;Orhan Lepara,&nbsp;Lutvo Sporisevic\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/aim.2023.31.41-47\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can cause a wide clinical spectrum, ranging from asymptomatic to severe disease with a high mortality rate. In view of the current pandemic and the increasing influx of patients into healthcare facilities, there is a need to identify simple and reliable tools for stratifying patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Study aimed to analyze whether hemogram-derived ratios (HDRs) can be used to identify patients with a risk of developing a severe clinical form and admission to hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional and observational study included 500 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. Data on clinical features and laboratory parameters were collected from medical records and 13 HDRs were calculated and analyzed. Descriptive and inferential statistics were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 500 patients, 43.8% had a severe form of the disease. Lymphocytopenia, monocytopenia, higher C-reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were found in severe patients (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Significantly higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived NLR (dNLR), neutrophil-to-platelet ratio (NPR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-to-platelet ratio (NLPR) and CRP-to-lymphocyte ratio (CRP/Ly) values were found in severe patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In addition, they have statistically significant prognostic potential (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) for CRP/Ly, dNLR, NLPR, NLR, and NPR were 0.693, 0.619, 0.619, 0.616, and 0.603, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity were 65.7% and 65.6% for CRP/Ly, 51.6% and 70.8 for dNLR, 61.6% and 57.3% for NLPR, 40.6% and 80.4% for NLR, and 48.8% and 69.1% for NPR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the study suggest that NLR, dNLR, CRP/Ly, NPR, and NLPR can be considered as potentially useful markers for stratifying patients with a severe form of the disease. HDRs derived from routine blood tests results should be included in common laboratory practice since they are readily available, easy to calculate, and inexpensive.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Informatica Medica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d8/84/AIM-31-41.PMC10082658.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Informatica Medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2023.31.41-47\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Informatica Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2023.31.41-47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)可引起广泛的临床症状,从无症状到严重疾病,死亡率高。鉴于目前的大流行和越来越多的病人涌入保健设施,有必要确定简单可靠的病人分层工具。目的:研究旨在分析血谱衍生比值(hdr)是否可以用于识别有发展为严重临床形式和住院风险的患者。方法:本横断面观察性研究纳入500例确诊为COVID-19的患者。从病历中收集临床特征和实验室参数数据,计算并分析13个hdr。分析包括描述性统计和推断性统计。结果:500例患者中,43.8%为重症。重症患者淋巴细胞减少、单核细胞减少、c反应蛋白(CRP)升高、红细胞沉降率(ESR)升高(p < 0.05)。重症患者中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、衍生性NLR (dNLR)、中性粒细胞与血小板比值(NPR)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞与血小板比值(NLPR)和CRP与淋巴细胞比值(CRP/Ly)均显著升高(p < 0.001)。此外,它们具有统计学上显著的预后潜力(p < 0.001)。CRP/Ly、dNLR、NLPR、NLR、NPR的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.693、0.619、0.619、0.616、0.603。CRP/Ly的敏感性和特异性分别为65.7%和65.6%,dNLR的敏感性和特异性分别为51.6%和70.8%,NLPR的敏感性和特异性分别为61.6%和57.3%,NLR的敏感性和特异性分别为40.6%和80.4%,NPR的敏感性和特异性分别为48.8%和69.1%。结论:研究结果表明,NLR、dNLR、CRP/Ly、NPR和NLPR可以被认为是对严重形式的疾病患者进行分层的潜在有用标记。常规血液检查结果得出的hdr应纳入实验室常规操作,因为它们容易获得、易于计算且价格低廉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Role of Hemogram-derived Ratios in COVID-19 Severity Stratification in a Primary Healthcare Facility.

The Role of Hemogram-derived Ratios in COVID-19 Severity Stratification in a Primary Healthcare Facility.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can cause a wide clinical spectrum, ranging from asymptomatic to severe disease with a high mortality rate. In view of the current pandemic and the increasing influx of patients into healthcare facilities, there is a need to identify simple and reliable tools for stratifying patients.

Objective: Study aimed to analyze whether hemogram-derived ratios (HDRs) can be used to identify patients with a risk of developing a severe clinical form and admission to hospital.

Methods: This cross-sectional and observational study included 500 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. Data on clinical features and laboratory parameters were collected from medical records and 13 HDRs were calculated and analyzed. Descriptive and inferential statistics were included in the analysis.

Results: Of the 500 patients, 43.8% had a severe form of the disease. Lymphocytopenia, monocytopenia, higher C-reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were found in severe patients (p < 0.05). Significantly higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived NLR (dNLR), neutrophil-to-platelet ratio (NPR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-to-platelet ratio (NLPR) and CRP-to-lymphocyte ratio (CRP/Ly) values were found in severe patients (p < 0.001). In addition, they have statistically significant prognostic potential (p < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) for CRP/Ly, dNLR, NLPR, NLR, and NPR were 0.693, 0.619, 0.619, 0.616, and 0.603, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity were 65.7% and 65.6% for CRP/Ly, 51.6% and 70.8 for dNLR, 61.6% and 57.3% for NLPR, 40.6% and 80.4% for NLR, and 48.8% and 69.1% for NPR.

Conclusion: The results of the study suggest that NLR, dNLR, CRP/Ly, NPR, and NLPR can be considered as potentially useful markers for stratifying patients with a severe form of the disease. HDRs derived from routine blood tests results should be included in common laboratory practice since they are readily available, easy to calculate, and inexpensive.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Informatica Medica
Acta Informatica Medica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信