形态学研究的新时代:比较解剖学研究方法综述。

IF 2.2 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY
K L Ford, J S Albert, A P Summers, B P Hedrick, E R Schachner, A S Jones, K Evans, P Chakrabarty
{"title":"形态学研究的新时代:比较解剖学研究方法综述。","authors":"K L Ford,&nbsp;J S Albert,&nbsp;A P Summers,&nbsp;B P Hedrick,&nbsp;E R Schachner,&nbsp;A S Jones,&nbsp;K Evans,&nbsp;P Chakrabarty","doi":"10.1093/iob/obad008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The increased use of imaging technology in biological research has drastically altered morphological studies in recent decades and allowed for the preservation of important collection specimens alongside detailed visualization of bony and soft-tissue structures. Despite the benefits associated with these newer imaging techniques, there remains a need for more \"traditional\" methods of morphological examination in many comparative studies. In this paper, we describe the costs and benefits of the various methods of visualizing, examining, and comparing morphological structures. There are significant differences not only in the costs associated with these different methods (monetary, time, equipment, and software), but also in the degree to which specimens are destroyed. We argue not for any one particular method over another in morphological studies, but instead suggest a combination of methods is useful not only for breadth of visualization, but also for the financial and time constraints often imposed on early-career research scientists.</p>","PeriodicalId":13666,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Organismal Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081917/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Era of Morphological Investigations: Reviewing Methods for Comparative Anatomical Studies.\",\"authors\":\"K L Ford,&nbsp;J S Albert,&nbsp;A P Summers,&nbsp;B P Hedrick,&nbsp;E R Schachner,&nbsp;A S Jones,&nbsp;K Evans,&nbsp;P Chakrabarty\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/iob/obad008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The increased use of imaging technology in biological research has drastically altered morphological studies in recent decades and allowed for the preservation of important collection specimens alongside detailed visualization of bony and soft-tissue structures. Despite the benefits associated with these newer imaging techniques, there remains a need for more \\\"traditional\\\" methods of morphological examination in many comparative studies. In this paper, we describe the costs and benefits of the various methods of visualizing, examining, and comparing morphological structures. There are significant differences not only in the costs associated with these different methods (monetary, time, equipment, and software), but also in the degree to which specimens are destroyed. We argue not for any one particular method over another in morphological studies, but instead suggest a combination of methods is useful not only for breadth of visualization, but also for the financial and time constraints often imposed on early-career research scientists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrative Organismal Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081917/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrative Organismal Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/iob/obad008\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Organismal Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/iob/obad008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

近几十年来,生物研究中越来越多地使用成像技术,极大地改变了形态学研究,并允许保存重要的收集标本以及骨骼和软组织结构的详细可视化。尽管这些较新的成像技术有好处,但在许多比较研究中,仍然需要更多的“传统”形态学检查方法。在本文中,我们描述了各种可视化,检查和比较形态结构的方法的成本和收益。这些不同的方法不仅在成本(金钱、时间、设备和软件)上存在显著差异,而且在标本被破坏的程度上也存在显著差异。在形态学研究中,我们不主张任何一种特定的方法优于另一种方法,而是建议多种方法的结合不仅对可视化的广度有用,而且对经常强加于早期职业研究科学家的财务和时间限制也有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A New Era of Morphological Investigations: Reviewing Methods for Comparative Anatomical Studies.

A New Era of Morphological Investigations: Reviewing Methods for Comparative Anatomical Studies.

A New Era of Morphological Investigations: Reviewing Methods for Comparative Anatomical Studies.

A New Era of Morphological Investigations: Reviewing Methods for Comparative Anatomical Studies.

The increased use of imaging technology in biological research has drastically altered morphological studies in recent decades and allowed for the preservation of important collection specimens alongside detailed visualization of bony and soft-tissue structures. Despite the benefits associated with these newer imaging techniques, there remains a need for more "traditional" methods of morphological examination in many comparative studies. In this paper, we describe the costs and benefits of the various methods of visualizing, examining, and comparing morphological structures. There are significant differences not only in the costs associated with these different methods (monetary, time, equipment, and software), but also in the degree to which specimens are destroyed. We argue not for any one particular method over another in morphological studies, but instead suggest a combination of methods is useful not only for breadth of visualization, but also for the financial and time constraints often imposed on early-career research scientists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
48
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信