用能量消耗测量方法验证饮食评估工具:这是否准确?

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Jalal Hejazi
{"title":"用能量消耗测量方法验证饮食评估工具:这是否准确?","authors":"Jalal Hejazi","doi":"10.1024/0300-9831/a000744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> Having an accurate dietary assessment tool is a necessity for most nutritional studies. As a result, many validation studies have been carried out to assess the validity of commonly used dietary assessment tools. Since based on the energy balance equation, among individuals with a stable weight, Energy Intake (EI) is equal to Energy Expenditure (EE) and there are precise methods for measurement of EE (e.g. doubly labeled water method), numerous studies have used this technique for validating dietary assessment tools. If there was a discrepancy between measured EI and EE, the researchers have concluded that self-reported dietary assessment tools are not valid or participants misreport their dietary intakes. However, the calculation of EI with common dietary assessment tools such as food frequency questionnaires (FFQs), 24-hour dietary recalls, or weighed food records, is based on fixed factors that were introduced by Atwater and the accuracy of these factors are under question. Moreover, the amount of energy absorption, and utilization from a diet, depends on various factors and there are considerable interindividual differences in this regard, for example in gut microbiota composition. As a result, the EI which is calculated using dietary assessment tools is likely not representative of real metabolizable energy which is equal to EE in individuals with stable weight, thus validating dietary assessment tools with EE measurement methods may not be accurate. We aim to address this issue briefly and propose a feasible elucidation, albeit not a complete solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":13884,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research","volume":"93 1","pages":"4-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validating dietary assessment tools with energy expenditure measurement methods: Is this accurate?\",\"authors\":\"Jalal Hejazi\",\"doi\":\"10.1024/0300-9831/a000744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b></b> Having an accurate dietary assessment tool is a necessity for most nutritional studies. As a result, many validation studies have been carried out to assess the validity of commonly used dietary assessment tools. Since based on the energy balance equation, among individuals with a stable weight, Energy Intake (EI) is equal to Energy Expenditure (EE) and there are precise methods for measurement of EE (e.g. doubly labeled water method), numerous studies have used this technique for validating dietary assessment tools. If there was a discrepancy between measured EI and EE, the researchers have concluded that self-reported dietary assessment tools are not valid or participants misreport their dietary intakes. However, the calculation of EI with common dietary assessment tools such as food frequency questionnaires (FFQs), 24-hour dietary recalls, or weighed food records, is based on fixed factors that were introduced by Atwater and the accuracy of these factors are under question. Moreover, the amount of energy absorption, and utilization from a diet, depends on various factors and there are considerable interindividual differences in this regard, for example in gut microbiota composition. As a result, the EI which is calculated using dietary assessment tools is likely not representative of real metabolizable energy which is equal to EE in individuals with stable weight, thus validating dietary assessment tools with EE measurement methods may not be accurate. We aim to address this issue briefly and propose a feasible elucidation, albeit not a complete solution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"4-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1024/0300-9831/a000744\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/0300-9831/a000744","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有一个准确的饮食评估工具是大多数营养研究的必要条件。因此,进行了许多验证研究来评估常用的饮食评估工具的有效性。由于基于能量平衡方程,在体重稳定的个体中,能量摄入(EI)等于能量消耗(EE),并且有精确的测量EE的方法(例如双标记水法),因此许多研究使用该技术来验证饮食评估工具。如果测量的EI和EE之间存在差异,研究人员得出结论,自我报告的饮食评估工具是无效的,或者参与者错误地报告了他们的饮食摄入量。然而,使用常见的饮食评估工具(如食物频率问卷(FFQs)、24小时饮食召回或称重食物记录)计算EI是基于阿特沃特引入的固定因素,这些因素的准确性受到质疑。此外,从饮食中吸收和利用能量的数量取决于各种因素,并且在这方面存在相当大的个体间差异,例如肠道微生物群组成。因此,使用饮食评估工具计算的EI可能不能代表体重稳定的个体的真实代谢能,代谢能等于EE,因此用EE测量方法验证饮食评估工具可能不准确。我们的目标是简要地解决这个问题,并提出一个可行的解释,尽管不是一个完整的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validating dietary assessment tools with energy expenditure measurement methods: Is this accurate?

Having an accurate dietary assessment tool is a necessity for most nutritional studies. As a result, many validation studies have been carried out to assess the validity of commonly used dietary assessment tools. Since based on the energy balance equation, among individuals with a stable weight, Energy Intake (EI) is equal to Energy Expenditure (EE) and there are precise methods for measurement of EE (e.g. doubly labeled water method), numerous studies have used this technique for validating dietary assessment tools. If there was a discrepancy between measured EI and EE, the researchers have concluded that self-reported dietary assessment tools are not valid or participants misreport their dietary intakes. However, the calculation of EI with common dietary assessment tools such as food frequency questionnaires (FFQs), 24-hour dietary recalls, or weighed food records, is based on fixed factors that were introduced by Atwater and the accuracy of these factors are under question. Moreover, the amount of energy absorption, and utilization from a diet, depends on various factors and there are considerable interindividual differences in this regard, for example in gut microbiota composition. As a result, the EI which is calculated using dietary assessment tools is likely not representative of real metabolizable energy which is equal to EE in individuals with stable weight, thus validating dietary assessment tools with EE measurement methods may not be accurate. We aim to address this issue briefly and propose a feasible elucidation, albeit not a complete solution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since 1930 this journal has provided an important international forum for scientific advances in the study of nutrition and vitamins. Widely read by academicians as well as scientists working in major governmental and corporate laboratories throughout the world, this publication presents work dealing with basic as well as applied topics in the field of micronutrients, macronutrients, and non-nutrients such as secondary plant compounds. The editorial and advisory boards include many of the leading persons currently working in this area. The journal is of particular interest to: - Nutritionists - Vitaminologists - Biochemists - Physicians - Engineers of human and animal nutrition - Food scientists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信