MRI预测模型在胫骨应力性骨折新兵训练中的应用。

Raymond J Carlson
{"title":"MRI预测模型在胫骨应力性骨折新兵训练中的应用。","authors":"Raymond J Carlson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of the study was to assess the utility of Fredricson Magnetic Resonance Imaging Grading model in predicting return to duty in Marine recruits who sustain tibia stress fractures at Marine Corps Recruit Depot San Diego (MCRDSD).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 106 tibia stress fractures in 82 Marine recruits was performed. A baseline Fredricson grade was assigned, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation. The electronic health record was reviewed for return to full duty. Non-parametric testing and descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the study population, varying subgroups, and the utility of this model in predicting the return to full duty in the recruit population and any differences based on stress fracture location or training platoon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean return to full duty (RTFD) was 11.8 weeks. The study participants sustained a greater percentage of middle tibia stress fractures (51.2%) and grade IV stress fractures (37.8 %) than other tibia sites and severities. There was a difference in RTFD amongst the Fredricson grades (p is equal to 0.001). The median RTFD for grade I stress fracture was 8.5 weeks, the median RTFD for grade II stress fracture was 10.00 weeks, the median RTFD for Grade III stress fracture was 10.00 weeks, and the median RTFD for grade IV stress fractures was 13.00 weeks. As Fredricson grade increased, RTFD increased (p is equal to 0.00) although no median RTFD met the Bonferroni correction for statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analysis suggested the Fredricson MRI grade was associated with RTFD in the recruit population. As Fredricson grade increased, median RTFD increased; however, mid-grade stress fractures (i.e., II-III) had similar median RTFD.</p>","PeriodicalId":74148,"journal":{"name":"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MRI Predictive Model's Utility in a Recruit Training Environment for Tibia Stress Fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Raymond J Carlson\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of the study was to assess the utility of Fredricson Magnetic Resonance Imaging Grading model in predicting return to duty in Marine recruits who sustain tibia stress fractures at Marine Corps Recruit Depot San Diego (MCRDSD).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 106 tibia stress fractures in 82 Marine recruits was performed. A baseline Fredricson grade was assigned, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation. The electronic health record was reviewed for return to full duty. Non-parametric testing and descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the study population, varying subgroups, and the utility of this model in predicting the return to full duty in the recruit population and any differences based on stress fracture location or training platoon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean return to full duty (RTFD) was 11.8 weeks. The study participants sustained a greater percentage of middle tibia stress fractures (51.2%) and grade IV stress fractures (37.8 %) than other tibia sites and severities. There was a difference in RTFD amongst the Fredricson grades (p is equal to 0.001). The median RTFD for grade I stress fracture was 8.5 weeks, the median RTFD for grade II stress fracture was 10.00 weeks, the median RTFD for Grade III stress fracture was 10.00 weeks, and the median RTFD for grade IV stress fractures was 13.00 weeks. As Fredricson grade increased, RTFD increased (p is equal to 0.00) although no median RTFD met the Bonferroni correction for statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analysis suggested the Fredricson MRI grade was associated with RTFD in the recruit population. As Fredricson grade increased, median RTFD increased; however, mid-grade stress fractures (i.e., II-III) had similar median RTFD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估Fredricson磁共振成像分级模型在预测圣地亚哥海军陆战队新兵基地(MCRDSD)胫骨应力性骨折的海军新兵重返岗位的效用。材料与方法:对82例海军新兵106例胫骨应力性骨折进行回顾性分析。根据磁共振成像(MRI)评估,分配基线弗雷德里克森评分。检查了电子健康记录,以便恢复正常工作。使用非参数检验和描述性统计来评估研究人群、不同的亚组,以及该模型在预测新兵群体恢复正常工作以及基于应力骨折位置或训练排的任何差异方面的效用。结果:平均恢复工作时间(RTFD)为11.8周。与其他胫骨部位和严重程度相比,研究参与者中胫骨应力性骨折(51.2%)和IV级应力性骨折(37.8%)的比例更高。在Fredricson等级中RTFD存在差异(p = 0.001)。I级应力性骨折的中位RTFD为8.5周,II级应力性骨折的中位RTFD为10.00周,III级应力性骨折的中位RTFD为10.00周,IV级应力性骨折的中位RTFD为13.00周。随着fredrickson分级的增加,RTFD增加(p = 0.00),尽管没有中位数RTFD符合Bonferroni校正的统计显著性。结论:分析表明,在招募人群中,Fredricson MRI分级与RTFD相关。随着弗雷德里克森评分的增加,中位RTFD增加;然而,中等级别应力性骨折(即II-III级)的中位RTFD相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MRI Predictive Model's Utility in a Recruit Training Environment for Tibia Stress Fractures.

Objective: The purpose of the study was to assess the utility of Fredricson Magnetic Resonance Imaging Grading model in predicting return to duty in Marine recruits who sustain tibia stress fractures at Marine Corps Recruit Depot San Diego (MCRDSD).

Materials and methods: A retrospective review of 106 tibia stress fractures in 82 Marine recruits was performed. A baseline Fredricson grade was assigned, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation. The electronic health record was reviewed for return to full duty. Non-parametric testing and descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the study population, varying subgroups, and the utility of this model in predicting the return to full duty in the recruit population and any differences based on stress fracture location or training platoon.

Results: The mean return to full duty (RTFD) was 11.8 weeks. The study participants sustained a greater percentage of middle tibia stress fractures (51.2%) and grade IV stress fractures (37.8 %) than other tibia sites and severities. There was a difference in RTFD amongst the Fredricson grades (p is equal to 0.001). The median RTFD for grade I stress fracture was 8.5 weeks, the median RTFD for grade II stress fracture was 10.00 weeks, the median RTFD for Grade III stress fracture was 10.00 weeks, and the median RTFD for grade IV stress fractures was 13.00 weeks. As Fredricson grade increased, RTFD increased (p is equal to 0.00) although no median RTFD met the Bonferroni correction for statistical significance.

Conclusion: The analysis suggested the Fredricson MRI grade was associated with RTFD in the recruit population. As Fredricson grade increased, median RTFD increased; however, mid-grade stress fractures (i.e., II-III) had similar median RTFD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信