新的 C1q 结合型供体特异性抗 HLA 抗体与肾移植后临床结果之间的关系:一项 Meta 分析。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Transplantation proceedings Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.10.054
Nur Rasyid, Gede Wirya Kusuma Duarsa, Pande Made Wisnu Tirtayasa, Gerhard Reinaldi Situmorang, Arry Rodjani
{"title":"新的 C1q 结合型供体特异性抗 HLA 抗体与肾移植后临床结果之间的关系:一项 Meta 分析。","authors":"Nur Rasyid, Gede Wirya Kusuma Duarsa, Pande Made Wisnu Tirtayasa, Gerhard Reinaldi Situmorang, Arry Rodjani","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.10.054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are recognized as an important factor of kidney allograft loss as a subsequent event of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). The clinical relevance of de novo DSAs (dnDSAs) after kidney transplant, particularly in their ability to bind C1q, has been widely investigated to various extents among studies. A recent study was performed to examine the association between C1q-binding dnDSAs and succeeding clinical events after kidney transplant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A meta-analysis of studies published before April 2021 was conducted from PubMed, Science Direct, and Cochrane databases. Publications on dnDSA after kidney transplant focusing on differentiation between C1q-binding and non-C1q-binding were included. The outcomes analyzed were AMR rate and allograft loss. Studies using preformed DSA were excluded. The pooled risk ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) were analyzed using Mantzel-Haenzel method, and the I<sup>2</sup> value was used to determine the heterogeneity of the studies. Data analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 535 patients from 13 studies who developed dnDSA after kidney transplant were analyzed. Among these, 239 (44.7%) had C1q-binding and 296 (55.3%) had non-C1q-binding dnDSA. Acute AMR was found in 59.2% (97/164) of the C1q-binding group and in 28.8% (49/170) of the non-C1q-binding group (risk ratio [RR], 0.58 [95% CI, 0.39-0.85], P = .006, I<sup>2</sup> = 58%). Chronic AMR was found in 50% (19/38) of the C1q-binding group and in 16.9% (11/65) of the non-C1q-binding group (RR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.21-0.71], P = .002, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Allograft loss was found in 62.2% (74/119) of the C1q-binding group and in 34.1% (60/176) of the non-C1q-binding group (RR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.38-0.85], P = .006, I<sup>2</sup> = 61%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrates that patients who developed C1q-binding dnDSA display an increased risk of AMR and allograft loss compared with those with non-C1q-binding dnDSA. Therefore, C1q-binding dnDSAs are associated with inferior outcomes after kidney transplant.</p>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":" ","pages":"1976-1983"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between De Novo C1q-Binding Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies and Clinical Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Nur Rasyid, Gede Wirya Kusuma Duarsa, Pande Made Wisnu Tirtayasa, Gerhard Reinaldi Situmorang, Arry Rodjani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.10.054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are recognized as an important factor of kidney allograft loss as a subsequent event of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). The clinical relevance of de novo DSAs (dnDSAs) after kidney transplant, particularly in their ability to bind C1q, has been widely investigated to various extents among studies. A recent study was performed to examine the association between C1q-binding dnDSAs and succeeding clinical events after kidney transplant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A meta-analysis of studies published before April 2021 was conducted from PubMed, Science Direct, and Cochrane databases. Publications on dnDSA after kidney transplant focusing on differentiation between C1q-binding and non-C1q-binding were included. The outcomes analyzed were AMR rate and allograft loss. Studies using preformed DSA were excluded. The pooled risk ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) were analyzed using Mantzel-Haenzel method, and the I<sup>2</sup> value was used to determine the heterogeneity of the studies. Data analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 535 patients from 13 studies who developed dnDSA after kidney transplant were analyzed. Among these, 239 (44.7%) had C1q-binding and 296 (55.3%) had non-C1q-binding dnDSA. Acute AMR was found in 59.2% (97/164) of the C1q-binding group and in 28.8% (49/170) of the non-C1q-binding group (risk ratio [RR], 0.58 [95% CI, 0.39-0.85], P = .006, I<sup>2</sup> = 58%). Chronic AMR was found in 50% (19/38) of the C1q-binding group and in 16.9% (11/65) of the non-C1q-binding group (RR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.21-0.71], P = .002, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Allograft loss was found in 62.2% (74/119) of the C1q-binding group and in 34.1% (60/176) of the non-C1q-binding group (RR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.38-0.85], P = .006, I<sup>2</sup> = 61%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrates that patients who developed C1q-binding dnDSA display an increased risk of AMR and allograft loss compared with those with non-C1q-binding dnDSA. Therefore, C1q-binding dnDSAs are associated with inferior outcomes after kidney transplant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1976-1983\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.10.054\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.10.054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:作为抗体介导的排斥反应(AMR)的后续事件,供体特异性抗体(DSAs)被认为是肾脏异体移植损失的一个重要因素。肾移植后新生DSAs(dnDSAs)的临床相关性,特别是其结合C1q的能力,已在不同研究中得到广泛探讨。最近的一项研究探讨了肾移植后 C1q 结合 dnDSAs 与后续临床事件之间的关联:方法:从 PubMed、Science Direct 和 Cochrane 数据库中对 2021 年 4 月之前发表的研究进行荟萃分析。纳入了有关肾移植后 dnDSA 的文献,重点是区分 C1q 结合型和非 C1q 结合型。分析的结果是AMR率和异体移植损失。使用预制 DSA 的研究被排除在外。采用Mantzel-Haenzel法分析汇总风险比和95%置信区间(CI),并用I2值确定研究的异质性。使用Review Manager 5.3进行数据分析:共分析了 13 项研究中的 535 例肾移植后出现 dnDSA 的患者。其中,239 例(44.7%)为 C1q 结合型 dnDSA,296 例(55.3%)为非 C1q 结合型 dnDSA。59.2%(97/164)的 C1q 结合组和 28.8%(49/170)的非 C1q 结合组发现了急性 AMR(风险比 [RR],0.58 [95% CI,0.39-0.85],P = .006,I2 = 58%)。C1q结合组50%(19/38)和非C1q结合组16.9%(11/65)发现慢性AMR(RR,0.39 [95% CI,0.21-0.71],P = .002,I2 = 0%)。C1q结合组62.2%(74/119)和非C1q结合组34.1%(60/176)发现异体移植物丢失(RR,0.57 [95% CI,0.38-0.85],P = .006,I2 = 61%):这项荟萃分析表明,与非 C1q 结合型 dnDSA 患者相比,C1q 结合型 dnDSA 患者发生 AMR 和同种异体移植损失的风险更高。因此,C1q结合型dnDSA与肾移植后的不良预后有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association Between De Novo C1q-Binding Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies and Clinical Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis.

Background: Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are recognized as an important factor of kidney allograft loss as a subsequent event of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). The clinical relevance of de novo DSAs (dnDSAs) after kidney transplant, particularly in their ability to bind C1q, has been widely investigated to various extents among studies. A recent study was performed to examine the association between C1q-binding dnDSAs and succeeding clinical events after kidney transplant.

Methods: A meta-analysis of studies published before April 2021 was conducted from PubMed, Science Direct, and Cochrane databases. Publications on dnDSA after kidney transplant focusing on differentiation between C1q-binding and non-C1q-binding were included. The outcomes analyzed were AMR rate and allograft loss. Studies using preformed DSA were excluded. The pooled risk ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) were analyzed using Mantzel-Haenzel method, and the I2 value was used to determine the heterogeneity of the studies. Data analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3.

Results: A total of 535 patients from 13 studies who developed dnDSA after kidney transplant were analyzed. Among these, 239 (44.7%) had C1q-binding and 296 (55.3%) had non-C1q-binding dnDSA. Acute AMR was found in 59.2% (97/164) of the C1q-binding group and in 28.8% (49/170) of the non-C1q-binding group (risk ratio [RR], 0.58 [95% CI, 0.39-0.85], P = .006, I2 = 58%). Chronic AMR was found in 50% (19/38) of the C1q-binding group and in 16.9% (11/65) of the non-C1q-binding group (RR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.21-0.71], P = .002, I2 = 0%). Allograft loss was found in 62.2% (74/119) of the C1q-binding group and in 34.1% (60/176) of the non-C1q-binding group (RR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.38-0.85], P = .006, I2 = 61%).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates that patients who developed C1q-binding dnDSA display an increased risk of AMR and allograft loss compared with those with non-C1q-binding dnDSA. Therefore, C1q-binding dnDSAs are associated with inferior outcomes after kidney transplant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation proceedings
Transplantation proceedings 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
502
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Transplantation Proceedings publishes several different categories of manuscripts, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. The first type of manuscripts consists of sets of papers providing an in-depth expression of the current state of the art in various rapidly developing components of world transplantation biology and medicine. These manuscripts emanate from congresses of the affiliated transplantation societies, from Symposia sponsored by the Societies, as well as special Conferences and Workshops covering related topics. Transplantation Proceedings also publishes several special sections including publication of Clinical Transplantation Proceedings, being rapid original contributions of preclinical and clinical experiences. These manuscripts undergo review by members of the Editorial Board. Original basic or clinical science articles, clinical trials and case studies can be submitted to the journal?s open access companion title Transplantation Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信