审查与α -二酮和乙酮职业暴露限值有关的证据,并考虑推导2,3-戊二酮的职业暴露限值。

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY
Jeffrey W Card, Kevin M Scaife, Lois A Haighton
{"title":"审查与α -二酮和乙酮职业暴露限值有关的证据,并考虑推导2,3-戊二酮的职业暴露限值。","authors":"Jeffrey W Card,&nbsp;Kevin M Scaife,&nbsp;Lois A Haighton","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2168175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alpha-diketones, notably diacetyl, have been used as flavoring agents. When airborne in occupational settings, exposures to diacetyl have been associated with serious respiratory disease. Other α-diketones, such as 2,3-pentanedione, and analogues such as acetoin (a reduced form of diacetyl), require evaluation, particularly, in light of recently available toxicological studies. The current work reviewed mechanistic, metabolic, and toxicology data available for α-diketones. Data were most available for diacetyl and 2,3-pentanedione, and a comparative assessment of their pulmonary effects was performed, and an occupational exposure limit (OEL) was proposed for 2,3-pentanedione. Previous OELs were reviewed and an updated literature search was performed. Respiratory system histopathology data from 3-month toxicology studies were evaluated with benchmark dose (BMD) modelling of sensitive endpoints. This demonstrated comparable responses at concentrations up to 100 ppm, with no consistent overall pattern of greater sensitivity to either diacetyl or 2,3-pentanedione. In contrast, based on draft raw data, no adverse respiratory effects were observed in comparable 3-month toxicology studies that evaluated exposure to acetoin at up to 800 ppm (highest tested concentration), indicating that acetoin does not present the same inhalation hazard as diacetyl or 2,3-pentanedione. To derive an OEL for 2,3-pentanedione, BMD modelling was conducted for the most sensitive endpoint from 90-day inhalation toxicity studies, namely, hyperplasia of nasal respiratory epithelium. On the basis of this modelling, an 8-hour time-weighted average OEL of 0.07 ppm is proposed to be protective against respiratory effects that may be associated with chronic workplace exposure to 2,3-pentanedione.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":"52 9","pages":"715-730"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of evidence relating to occupational exposure limits for alpha-diketones and acetoin, and considerations for deriving an occupational exposure limit for 2,3-pentanedione.\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey W Card,&nbsp;Kevin M Scaife,&nbsp;Lois A Haighton\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10408444.2023.2168175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Alpha-diketones, notably diacetyl, have been used as flavoring agents. When airborne in occupational settings, exposures to diacetyl have been associated with serious respiratory disease. Other α-diketones, such as 2,3-pentanedione, and analogues such as acetoin (a reduced form of diacetyl), require evaluation, particularly, in light of recently available toxicological studies. The current work reviewed mechanistic, metabolic, and toxicology data available for α-diketones. Data were most available for diacetyl and 2,3-pentanedione, and a comparative assessment of their pulmonary effects was performed, and an occupational exposure limit (OEL) was proposed for 2,3-pentanedione. Previous OELs were reviewed and an updated literature search was performed. Respiratory system histopathology data from 3-month toxicology studies were evaluated with benchmark dose (BMD) modelling of sensitive endpoints. This demonstrated comparable responses at concentrations up to 100 ppm, with no consistent overall pattern of greater sensitivity to either diacetyl or 2,3-pentanedione. In contrast, based on draft raw data, no adverse respiratory effects were observed in comparable 3-month toxicology studies that evaluated exposure to acetoin at up to 800 ppm (highest tested concentration), indicating that acetoin does not present the same inhalation hazard as diacetyl or 2,3-pentanedione. To derive an OEL for 2,3-pentanedione, BMD modelling was conducted for the most sensitive endpoint from 90-day inhalation toxicity studies, namely, hyperplasia of nasal respiratory epithelium. On the basis of this modelling, an 8-hour time-weighted average OEL of 0.07 ppm is proposed to be protective against respiratory effects that may be associated with chronic workplace exposure to 2,3-pentanedione.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Reviews in Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"52 9\",\"pages\":\"715-730\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Reviews in Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2023.2168175\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2023.2168175","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

-二酮,特别是二乙酰,已被用作调味剂。当在职业环境中空气传播时,接触二乙酰与严重呼吸道疾病有关。其他α-二酮,如2,3-戊二酮和类似物,如乙酮(二乙酰的一种简化形式),需要评估,特别是根据最近可用的毒理学研究。目前的工作综述了α-二酮的机制、代谢和毒理学数据。关于二乙酰基和2,3-戊二酮的数据最多,并对它们的肺部影响进行了比较评估,并提出了2,3-戊二酮的职业暴露限值(OEL)。我们回顾了以前的OELs,并进行了更新的文献检索。3个月毒理学研究的呼吸系统组织病理学数据用敏感终点的基准剂量(BMD)模型进行评估。这表明,在高达100 ppm的浓度下,可比较的反应,没有一致的对二乙酰或2,3-戊二酮更敏感的总体模式。相比之下,根据原始数据草案,在3个月的毒理学研究中没有观察到不良呼吸效应,这些毒理学研究评估了高达800 ppm(最高测试浓度)的乙托因暴露,表明乙托因不具有与二乙酰或2,3-戊二酮相同的吸入危害。为了获得2,3-戊二酮的OEL,对90天吸入毒性研究中最敏感的终点,即鼻呼吸道上皮增生,进行了BMD建模。在此模型的基础上,建议0.07 ppm的8小时时间加权平均OEL可防止可能与工作场所长期暴露于2,3-戊二酮有关的呼吸效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review of evidence relating to occupational exposure limits for alpha-diketones and acetoin, and considerations for deriving an occupational exposure limit for 2,3-pentanedione.

Alpha-diketones, notably diacetyl, have been used as flavoring agents. When airborne in occupational settings, exposures to diacetyl have been associated with serious respiratory disease. Other α-diketones, such as 2,3-pentanedione, and analogues such as acetoin (a reduced form of diacetyl), require evaluation, particularly, in light of recently available toxicological studies. The current work reviewed mechanistic, metabolic, and toxicology data available for α-diketones. Data were most available for diacetyl and 2,3-pentanedione, and a comparative assessment of their pulmonary effects was performed, and an occupational exposure limit (OEL) was proposed for 2,3-pentanedione. Previous OELs were reviewed and an updated literature search was performed. Respiratory system histopathology data from 3-month toxicology studies were evaluated with benchmark dose (BMD) modelling of sensitive endpoints. This demonstrated comparable responses at concentrations up to 100 ppm, with no consistent overall pattern of greater sensitivity to either diacetyl or 2,3-pentanedione. In contrast, based on draft raw data, no adverse respiratory effects were observed in comparable 3-month toxicology studies that evaluated exposure to acetoin at up to 800 ppm (highest tested concentration), indicating that acetoin does not present the same inhalation hazard as diacetyl or 2,3-pentanedione. To derive an OEL for 2,3-pentanedione, BMD modelling was conducted for the most sensitive endpoint from 90-day inhalation toxicity studies, namely, hyperplasia of nasal respiratory epithelium. On the basis of this modelling, an 8-hour time-weighted average OEL of 0.07 ppm is proposed to be protective against respiratory effects that may be associated with chronic workplace exposure to 2,3-pentanedione.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
1.70%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Toxicology provides up-to-date, objective analyses of topics related to the mechanisms of action, responses, and assessment of health risks due to toxicant exposure. The journal publishes critical, comprehensive reviews of research findings in toxicology and the application of toxicological information in assessing human health hazards and risks. Toxicants of concern include commodity and specialty chemicals such as formaldehyde, acrylonitrile, and pesticides; pharmaceutical agents of all types; consumer products such as macronutrients and food additives; environmental agents such as ambient ozone; and occupational exposures such as asbestos and benzene.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信