使用机器学习算法预测急诊科糖尿病患者的患者门户使用情况。

Yuan Zhou, Thomas K Swoboda, Zehao Ye, Michael Barbaro, Jake Blalock, Danny Zheng, Hao Wang
{"title":"使用机器学习算法预测急诊科糖尿病患者的患者门户使用情况。","authors":"Yuan Zhou,&nbsp;Thomas K Swoboda,&nbsp;Zehao Ye,&nbsp;Michael Barbaro,&nbsp;Jake Blalock,&nbsp;Danny Zheng,&nbsp;Hao Wang","doi":"10.14740/jocmr4862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Different machine learning (ML) technologies have been applied in healthcare systems with diverse applications. We aimed to determine the model feasibility and accuracy of predicting patient portal use among diabetic patients by using six different ML algorithms. In addition, we also compared model performance accuracy with the use of only essential variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective observational study. From March 1, 2019 to February 28, 2020, we included all diabetic patients from the study emergency department (ED). The primary outcome was the status of patient portal use. A total of 18 variables consisting of patient sociodemographic characteristics, ED and clinic information, and patient medical conditions were included to predict patient portal use. Six ML algorithms (logistic regression, random forest (RF), deep forest, decision tree, multilayer perception, and support vector machine) were used for such predictions. During the initial step, ML predictions were performed with all variables. Then, the essential variables were chosen via feature selection. Patient portal use predictions were repeated with only essential variables. The performance accuracies (overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)) of patient portal predictions were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 77,977 unique patients were placed in our final analysis. Among them, 23.4% (18,223) patients were diabetic mellitus (DM). Patient portal use was found in 26.9% of DM patients. Overall, the accuracy of predicting patient portal use was above 80% among five out of six ML algorithms. The RF outperformed the others when all variables were used for patient portal predictions (accuracy 0.9876, sensitivity 0.9454, specificity 0.9969, and AUC 0.9712). When only eight essential variables were chosen, RF still outperformed the others (accuracy 0.9876, sensitivity 0.9374, specificity 0.9932, and AUC 0.9769).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is possible to predict patient portal use outcomes when different ML algorithms are used with fair performance accuracy. However, with similar prediction accuracies, the use of feature selection techniques can improve the interpretability of the model by addressing the most relevant features.</p>","PeriodicalId":15431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine Research","volume":"15 3","pages":"133-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bf/85/jocmr-15-133.PMC10079369.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Patient Portal Use Among Emergency Department Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.\",\"authors\":\"Yuan Zhou,&nbsp;Thomas K Swoboda,&nbsp;Zehao Ye,&nbsp;Michael Barbaro,&nbsp;Jake Blalock,&nbsp;Danny Zheng,&nbsp;Hao Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.14740/jocmr4862\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Different machine learning (ML) technologies have been applied in healthcare systems with diverse applications. We aimed to determine the model feasibility and accuracy of predicting patient portal use among diabetic patients by using six different ML algorithms. In addition, we also compared model performance accuracy with the use of only essential variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective observational study. From March 1, 2019 to February 28, 2020, we included all diabetic patients from the study emergency department (ED). The primary outcome was the status of patient portal use. A total of 18 variables consisting of patient sociodemographic characteristics, ED and clinic information, and patient medical conditions were included to predict patient portal use. Six ML algorithms (logistic regression, random forest (RF), deep forest, decision tree, multilayer perception, and support vector machine) were used for such predictions. During the initial step, ML predictions were performed with all variables. Then, the essential variables were chosen via feature selection. Patient portal use predictions were repeated with only essential variables. The performance accuracies (overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)) of patient portal predictions were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 77,977 unique patients were placed in our final analysis. Among them, 23.4% (18,223) patients were diabetic mellitus (DM). Patient portal use was found in 26.9% of DM patients. Overall, the accuracy of predicting patient portal use was above 80% among five out of six ML algorithms. The RF outperformed the others when all variables were used for patient portal predictions (accuracy 0.9876, sensitivity 0.9454, specificity 0.9969, and AUC 0.9712). When only eight essential variables were chosen, RF still outperformed the others (accuracy 0.9876, sensitivity 0.9374, specificity 0.9932, and AUC 0.9769).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is possible to predict patient portal use outcomes when different ML algorithms are used with fair performance accuracy. However, with similar prediction accuracies, the use of feature selection techniques can improve the interpretability of the model by addressing the most relevant features.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine Research\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"133-138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bf/85/jocmr-15-133.PMC10079369.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr4862\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr4862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不同的机器学习(ML)技术在医疗保健系统中有不同的应用。我们的目的是通过使用六种不同的ML算法来确定预测糖尿病患者门静脉使用的模型可行性和准确性。此外,我们还比较了仅使用基本变量的模型性能准确性。方法:本研究为单中心回顾性观察性研究。从2019年3月1日至2020年2月28日,我们纳入了研究急诊科(ED)的所有糖尿病患者。主要观察指标为患者门静脉使用情况。共纳入18个变量,包括患者社会人口学特征、ED和临床信息以及患者医疗状况,以预测患者门户网站的使用情况。六种机器学习算法(逻辑回归,随机森林(RF),深度森林,决策树,多层感知和支持向量机)用于此类预测。在初始步骤中,使用所有变量执行ML预测。然后,通过特征选择选择基本变量。仅使用基本变量重复患者门户使用预测。比较患者门脉预测的性能准确性(总体准确性、敏感性、特异性和接受者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC))。结果:共有77,977名独特的患者被纳入我们的最终分析。其中糖尿病(DM)患者占23.4%(18223例)。26.9%的糖尿病患者有门静脉使用。总体而言,六种ML算法中有五种预测患者门户使用的准确性超过80%。当所有变量用于患者门脉预测时,RF优于其他变量(准确性0.9876,灵敏度0.9454,特异性0.9969,AUC 0.9712)。当仅选择8个基本变量时,RF仍然优于其他变量(准确性0.9876,灵敏度0.9374,特异性0.9932,AUC 0.9769)。结论:当使用不同的机器学习算法时,以公平的性能准确性预测患者门户使用结果是可能的。然而,在类似的预测精度下,使用特征选择技术可以通过处理最相关的特征来提高模型的可解释性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Using Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Patient Portal Use Among Emergency Department Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.

Using Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Patient Portal Use Among Emergency Department Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.

Background: Different machine learning (ML) technologies have been applied in healthcare systems with diverse applications. We aimed to determine the model feasibility and accuracy of predicting patient portal use among diabetic patients by using six different ML algorithms. In addition, we also compared model performance accuracy with the use of only essential variables.

Methods: This was a single-center retrospective observational study. From March 1, 2019 to February 28, 2020, we included all diabetic patients from the study emergency department (ED). The primary outcome was the status of patient portal use. A total of 18 variables consisting of patient sociodemographic characteristics, ED and clinic information, and patient medical conditions were included to predict patient portal use. Six ML algorithms (logistic regression, random forest (RF), deep forest, decision tree, multilayer perception, and support vector machine) were used for such predictions. During the initial step, ML predictions were performed with all variables. Then, the essential variables were chosen via feature selection. Patient portal use predictions were repeated with only essential variables. The performance accuracies (overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)) of patient portal predictions were compared.

Results: A total of 77,977 unique patients were placed in our final analysis. Among them, 23.4% (18,223) patients were diabetic mellitus (DM). Patient portal use was found in 26.9% of DM patients. Overall, the accuracy of predicting patient portal use was above 80% among five out of six ML algorithms. The RF outperformed the others when all variables were used for patient portal predictions (accuracy 0.9876, sensitivity 0.9454, specificity 0.9969, and AUC 0.9712). When only eight essential variables were chosen, RF still outperformed the others (accuracy 0.9876, sensitivity 0.9374, specificity 0.9932, and AUC 0.9769).

Conclusion: It is possible to predict patient portal use outcomes when different ML algorithms are used with fair performance accuracy. However, with similar prediction accuracies, the use of feature selection techniques can improve the interpretability of the model by addressing the most relevant features.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信