机器人与功能性电刺激时的皮质加工。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Woosang Cho, Carmen Vidaurre, Jinung An, Niels Birbaumer, Ander Ramos-Murguialday
{"title":"机器人与功能性电刺激时的皮质加工。","authors":"Woosang Cho,&nbsp;Carmen Vidaurre,&nbsp;Jinung An,&nbsp;Niels Birbaumer,&nbsp;Ander Ramos-Murguialday","doi":"10.3389/fnsys.2023.1045396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Like alpha rhythm, the somatosensory mu rhythm is suppressed in the presence of somatosensory inputs by implying cortical excitation. Sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) can be classified into two oscillatory frequency components: mu rhythm (8-13 Hz) and beta rhythm (14-25 Hz). The suppressed/enhanced SMR is a neural correlate of cortical activation related to efferent and afferent movement information. Therefore, it would be necessary to understand cortical information processing in diverse movement situations for clinical applications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this work, the EEG of 10 healthy volunteers was recorded while fingers were moved passively under different kinetic and kinematic conditions for proprioceptive stimulation. For the kinetics aspect, afferent brain activity (no simultaneous volition) was compared under two conditions of finger extension: (1) generated by an orthosis and (2) generated by the orthosis simultaneously combined and assisted with functional electrical stimulation (FES) applied at the forearm muscles related to finger extension. For the kinematic aspect, the finger extension was divided into two phases: (1) dynamic extension and (2) static extension (holding the extended position).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the kinematic aspect, both mu and beta rhythms were more suppressed during a dynamic than a static condition. However, only the mu rhythm showed a significant difference between kinetic conditions (with and without FES) affected by attention to proprioception after transitioning from dynamic to static state, but the beta rhythm was not.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our results indicate that mu rhythm was influenced considerably by muscle kinetics during finger movement produced by external devices, which has relevant implications for the design of neuromodulation and neurorehabilitation interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12649,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience","volume":"17 ","pages":"1045396"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10070684/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cortical processing during robot and functional electrical stimulation.\",\"authors\":\"Woosang Cho,&nbsp;Carmen Vidaurre,&nbsp;Jinung An,&nbsp;Niels Birbaumer,&nbsp;Ander Ramos-Murguialday\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnsys.2023.1045396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Like alpha rhythm, the somatosensory mu rhythm is suppressed in the presence of somatosensory inputs by implying cortical excitation. Sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) can be classified into two oscillatory frequency components: mu rhythm (8-13 Hz) and beta rhythm (14-25 Hz). The suppressed/enhanced SMR is a neural correlate of cortical activation related to efferent and afferent movement information. Therefore, it would be necessary to understand cortical information processing in diverse movement situations for clinical applications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this work, the EEG of 10 healthy volunteers was recorded while fingers were moved passively under different kinetic and kinematic conditions for proprioceptive stimulation. For the kinetics aspect, afferent brain activity (no simultaneous volition) was compared under two conditions of finger extension: (1) generated by an orthosis and (2) generated by the orthosis simultaneously combined and assisted with functional electrical stimulation (FES) applied at the forearm muscles related to finger extension. For the kinematic aspect, the finger extension was divided into two phases: (1) dynamic extension and (2) static extension (holding the extended position).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the kinematic aspect, both mu and beta rhythms were more suppressed during a dynamic than a static condition. However, only the mu rhythm showed a significant difference between kinetic conditions (with and without FES) affected by attention to proprioception after transitioning from dynamic to static state, but the beta rhythm was not.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our results indicate that mu rhythm was influenced considerably by muscle kinetics during finger movement produced by external devices, which has relevant implications for the design of neuromodulation and neurorehabilitation interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"1045396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10070684/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2023.1045396\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2023.1045396","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

与α节律一样,体感mu节律在存在体感输入时通过暗示皮层兴奋而被抑制。感觉运动节律(SMR)可分为两种振荡频率成分:mu节律(8-13 Hz)和beta节律(14-25 Hz)。抑制/增强的SMR是与传出和传入运动信息相关的皮层激活的神经关联。因此,了解不同运动状态下大脑皮层的信息加工过程对临床应用具有重要意义。方法:对10名健康志愿者在不同的运动和运动条件下被动移动手指进行本体感觉刺激,记录其脑电图。在动力学方面,比较了两种手指伸展条件下的传入脑活动(无同时意志):(1)由矫形器产生,(2)由矫形器同时结合并辅助功能电刺激(FES)作用于与手指伸展相关的前臂肌肉产生。在运动学方面,手指伸展分为两个阶段:(1)动态伸展和(2)静态伸展(保持伸展位置)。结果:在运动学方面,mu和beta节律在动态条件下比静态条件下受到更大的抑制。然而,在动态向静态过渡后,受本体感觉注意影响的运动状态(有和没有FES)中,只有mu节律表现出显著差异,而β节律则无显著差异。讨论:我们的研究结果表明,在外部装置产生的手指运动过程中,mu节律受到肌肉动力学的显著影响,这对神经调节和神经康复干预的设计具有相关意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cortical processing during robot and functional electrical stimulation.

Cortical processing during robot and functional electrical stimulation.

Cortical processing during robot and functional electrical stimulation.

Cortical processing during robot and functional electrical stimulation.

Introduction: Like alpha rhythm, the somatosensory mu rhythm is suppressed in the presence of somatosensory inputs by implying cortical excitation. Sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) can be classified into two oscillatory frequency components: mu rhythm (8-13 Hz) and beta rhythm (14-25 Hz). The suppressed/enhanced SMR is a neural correlate of cortical activation related to efferent and afferent movement information. Therefore, it would be necessary to understand cortical information processing in diverse movement situations for clinical applications.

Methods: In this work, the EEG of 10 healthy volunteers was recorded while fingers were moved passively under different kinetic and kinematic conditions for proprioceptive stimulation. For the kinetics aspect, afferent brain activity (no simultaneous volition) was compared under two conditions of finger extension: (1) generated by an orthosis and (2) generated by the orthosis simultaneously combined and assisted with functional electrical stimulation (FES) applied at the forearm muscles related to finger extension. For the kinematic aspect, the finger extension was divided into two phases: (1) dynamic extension and (2) static extension (holding the extended position).

Results: In the kinematic aspect, both mu and beta rhythms were more suppressed during a dynamic than a static condition. However, only the mu rhythm showed a significant difference between kinetic conditions (with and without FES) affected by attention to proprioception after transitioning from dynamic to static state, but the beta rhythm was not.

Discussion: Our results indicate that mu rhythm was influenced considerably by muscle kinetics during finger movement produced by external devices, which has relevant implications for the design of neuromodulation and neurorehabilitation interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Neuroscience-Developmental Neuroscience
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
144
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of whole systems of the brain, including those involved in sensation, movement, learning and memory, attention, reward, decision-making, reasoning, executive functions, and emotions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信