腹腔镜骶骶固定术术后2年随访中盆腔器官脱垂复发的中期风险。

IF 1.4 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Hirotaka Sato, Shota Otsuka, Hirokazu Abe, Tomoaki Miyagawa
{"title":"腹腔镜骶骶固定术术后2年随访中盆腔器官脱垂复发的中期风险。","authors":"Hirotaka Sato,&nbsp;Shota Otsuka,&nbsp;Hirokazu Abe,&nbsp;Tomoaki Miyagawa","doi":"10.4103/gmit.gmit_59_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study was performed to determine the risk of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse (POP) within 2 years after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) in patients with uterovaginal prolapse.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective comparative study was performed in a population of 204 patients over a 2-year follow-up period following LSC with concomitant supracervical hysterectomy or uterine preservation at a single urological clinic between 2015 and 2019. The primary outcome was surgical failure following LSC in cases of POP, focusing on failures occurring before the 2<sup>nd</sup>year of follow-up. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the odds ratios (ORs) for surgical failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary outcome, surgical failure in cases of POP, occurred 2 years after the initial surgery in 19 of the 204 patients (9.3%) (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7% - 14.2%). Surgical failure was most common in the anterior compartment (<i>n</i> = 10, 4.9%), and further surgery was performed in seven of the patients with surgical failure (3.4%). The poor primary outcome was predicted by lysis of adhesions (OR, 7.5, 95% CI, 1.6-33.8, <i>P</i> = 0.008) and preoperative POP stage IV (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.1-10.8, <i>P</i> = 0.03) on multivariable logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The overall rate of surgical failure following LSC in our cohort was 9.3% over the 2-year follow-up period after surgery, and preoperative prolapse stage IV was associated with a higher risk of recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":45272,"journal":{"name":"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT","volume":"12 1","pages":"38-43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/91/2a/GMIT-12-38.PMC10071876.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medium-Term Risk of Recurrent Pelvic Organ Prolapse within 2-Year Follow-Up after Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy.\",\"authors\":\"Hirotaka Sato,&nbsp;Shota Otsuka,&nbsp;Hirokazu Abe,&nbsp;Tomoaki Miyagawa\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/gmit.gmit_59_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study was performed to determine the risk of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse (POP) within 2 years after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) in patients with uterovaginal prolapse.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective comparative study was performed in a population of 204 patients over a 2-year follow-up period following LSC with concomitant supracervical hysterectomy or uterine preservation at a single urological clinic between 2015 and 2019. The primary outcome was surgical failure following LSC in cases of POP, focusing on failures occurring before the 2<sup>nd</sup>year of follow-up. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the odds ratios (ORs) for surgical failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary outcome, surgical failure in cases of POP, occurred 2 years after the initial surgery in 19 of the 204 patients (9.3%) (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7% - 14.2%). Surgical failure was most common in the anterior compartment (<i>n</i> = 10, 4.9%), and further surgery was performed in seven of the patients with surgical failure (3.4%). The poor primary outcome was predicted by lysis of adhesions (OR, 7.5, 95% CI, 1.6-33.8, <i>P</i> = 0.008) and preoperative POP stage IV (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.1-10.8, <i>P</i> = 0.03) on multivariable logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The overall rate of surgical failure following LSC in our cohort was 9.3% over the 2-year follow-up period after surgery, and preoperative prolapse stage IV was associated with a higher risk of recurrence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"38-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/91/2a/GMIT-12-38.PMC10071876.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/gmit.gmit_59_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/gmit.gmit_59_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在确定子宫阴道脱垂患者行腹腔镜骶colpop固定术(LSC)后2年内复发盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的风险。材料和方法:2015年至2019年,在一家泌尿科诊所,对LSC合并宫颈上子宫切除术或子宫保留术后204例患者进行了为期2年的回顾性比较研究。主要结果是POP病例LSC后手术失败,重点是随访2年之前发生的失败。采用Logistic回归分析确定手术失败的优势比(ORs)。结果:204例患者中有19例(9.3%)在首次手术后2年出现手术失败(95%可信区间[CI], 5.7% - 14.2%)。手术失败在前房室最常见(n = 10, 4.9%),手术失败的患者中有7例(3.4%)进行了进一步的手术。不良的主要预后预测为粘连溶解(OR, 7.5, 95% CI, 1.6-33.8, P = 0.008)和术前POP IV期(OR, 3.5;多变量logistic回归分析95% CI, 1.1 ~ 10.8, P = 0.03)。结论:在我们的队列中,LSC术后2年随访期间的总体手术失败率为9.3%,术前IV期脱垂与较高的复发风险相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Medium-Term Risk of Recurrent Pelvic Organ Prolapse within 2-Year Follow-Up after Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy.

Medium-Term Risk of Recurrent Pelvic Organ Prolapse within 2-Year Follow-Up after Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy.

Objective: The present study was performed to determine the risk of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse (POP) within 2 years after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) in patients with uterovaginal prolapse.

Materials and methods: A retrospective comparative study was performed in a population of 204 patients over a 2-year follow-up period following LSC with concomitant supracervical hysterectomy or uterine preservation at a single urological clinic between 2015 and 2019. The primary outcome was surgical failure following LSC in cases of POP, focusing on failures occurring before the 2ndyear of follow-up. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the odds ratios (ORs) for surgical failure.

Results: The primary outcome, surgical failure in cases of POP, occurred 2 years after the initial surgery in 19 of the 204 patients (9.3%) (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7% - 14.2%). Surgical failure was most common in the anterior compartment (n = 10, 4.9%), and further surgery was performed in seven of the patients with surgical failure (3.4%). The poor primary outcome was predicted by lysis of adhesions (OR, 7.5, 95% CI, 1.6-33.8, P = 0.008) and preoperative POP stage IV (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.1-10.8, P = 0.03) on multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Conclusion: The overall rate of surgical failure following LSC in our cohort was 9.3% over the 2-year follow-up period after surgery, and preoperative prolapse stage IV was associated with a higher risk of recurrence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
98
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信