在连续血糖监测时代推进糖尿病质量测量。

Maliha Khan, Naila Wahid, Taylor Musser, Richard M Bergenstal, Osagie Ebekozien, Kenneth Snow, Kate Thomas, Christel Aprigliano
{"title":"在连续血糖监测时代推进糖尿病质量测量。","authors":"Maliha Khan,&nbsp;Naila Wahid,&nbsp;Taylor Musser,&nbsp;Richard M Bergenstal,&nbsp;Osagie Ebekozien,&nbsp;Kenneth Snow,&nbsp;Kate Thomas,&nbsp;Christel Aprigliano","doi":"10.1177/26350106231163518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this research is to develop a set of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-related measure concepts to be tested in a health care system. Existing measures assessing the quality of diabetes care do not include modern approaches to diabetes management, such as CGM. Continuous glucose monitors rival traditional methods of measuring diabetes management by providing real-time, longitudinal data and demonstrating glucose variability over time. The Improving Diabetes Quality Initiative seeks to address this gap in diabetes quality measurement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Technical Expert Panel (TEP) was convened to curate a diabetes quality measures portfolio and conceptualize three new CGM-related quality measures within the portfolio. From the additional measure concepts identified in the portfolio, the TEP prioritized three for conceptualization. High-level measure concept specifications were made available during a public comment period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The measure concepts prioritized by the TEP included a shared decision-making measure to assess the value of initiating CGM for disease management, a utilization measure to address disparities in access and use of CGM, and a patient-provider review of CGM data to promote routine consideration of these assessments in treatment and ongoing management. Clinical literature, public comments, and TEP feedback informed full measure specifications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The evolution of diabetes technology reflects the need to shift diabetes quality of care. The measure concepts will be tested in a flexible pilot setting to understand the future of diabetes care and communicate the value of CGM to people with diabetes, providers, and payers.</p>","PeriodicalId":75187,"journal":{"name":"The science of diabetes self-management and care","volume":"49 2","pages":"112-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing Diabetes Quality Measurement in the Era of Continuous Glucose Monitoring.\",\"authors\":\"Maliha Khan,&nbsp;Naila Wahid,&nbsp;Taylor Musser,&nbsp;Richard M Bergenstal,&nbsp;Osagie Ebekozien,&nbsp;Kenneth Snow,&nbsp;Kate Thomas,&nbsp;Christel Aprigliano\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26350106231163518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this research is to develop a set of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-related measure concepts to be tested in a health care system. Existing measures assessing the quality of diabetes care do not include modern approaches to diabetes management, such as CGM. Continuous glucose monitors rival traditional methods of measuring diabetes management by providing real-time, longitudinal data and demonstrating glucose variability over time. The Improving Diabetes Quality Initiative seeks to address this gap in diabetes quality measurement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Technical Expert Panel (TEP) was convened to curate a diabetes quality measures portfolio and conceptualize three new CGM-related quality measures within the portfolio. From the additional measure concepts identified in the portfolio, the TEP prioritized three for conceptualization. High-level measure concept specifications were made available during a public comment period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The measure concepts prioritized by the TEP included a shared decision-making measure to assess the value of initiating CGM for disease management, a utilization measure to address disparities in access and use of CGM, and a patient-provider review of CGM data to promote routine consideration of these assessments in treatment and ongoing management. Clinical literature, public comments, and TEP feedback informed full measure specifications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The evolution of diabetes technology reflects the need to shift diabetes quality of care. The measure concepts will be tested in a flexible pilot setting to understand the future of diabetes care and communicate the value of CGM to people with diabetes, providers, and payers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The science of diabetes self-management and care\",\"volume\":\"49 2\",\"pages\":\"112-125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The science of diabetes self-management and care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26350106231163518\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The science of diabetes self-management and care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26350106231163518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是开发一套与连续血糖监测(CGM)相关的测量概念,用于医疗保健系统的测试。评估糖尿病护理质量的现有措施不包括现代糖尿病管理方法,如CGM。连续血糖监测仪通过提供实时、纵向数据和显示血糖随时间的变化,与传统的测量糖尿病管理的方法相竞争。改善糖尿病质量倡议旨在解决糖尿病质量测量中的这一差距。方法:召集技术专家小组(TEP)来策划糖尿病质量措施组合,并概念化组合中三个新的与cgm相关的质量措施。从投资组合中确定的附加度量概念中,TEP优先考虑了三个概念化概念。在公众评论期间提供了高级度量概念规范。结果:TEP优先考虑的措施概念包括一个共同的决策措施,以评估启动CGM对疾病管理的价值,一个利用措施,以解决CGM在获取和使用方面的差异,以及一个患者-提供者对CGM数据的审查,以促进在治疗和持续管理中常规考虑这些评估。临床文献、公众意见和TEP反馈告知了完整的测量规范。结论:糖尿病技术的发展反映了改变糖尿病护理质量的需要。测量概念将在一个灵活的试点环境中进行测试,以了解糖尿病护理的未来,并向糖尿病患者、提供者和支付者传达CGM的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advancing Diabetes Quality Measurement in the Era of Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Purpose: The purpose of this research is to develop a set of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-related measure concepts to be tested in a health care system. Existing measures assessing the quality of diabetes care do not include modern approaches to diabetes management, such as CGM. Continuous glucose monitors rival traditional methods of measuring diabetes management by providing real-time, longitudinal data and demonstrating glucose variability over time. The Improving Diabetes Quality Initiative seeks to address this gap in diabetes quality measurement.

Methods: A Technical Expert Panel (TEP) was convened to curate a diabetes quality measures portfolio and conceptualize three new CGM-related quality measures within the portfolio. From the additional measure concepts identified in the portfolio, the TEP prioritized three for conceptualization. High-level measure concept specifications were made available during a public comment period.

Results: The measure concepts prioritized by the TEP included a shared decision-making measure to assess the value of initiating CGM for disease management, a utilization measure to address disparities in access and use of CGM, and a patient-provider review of CGM data to promote routine consideration of these assessments in treatment and ongoing management. Clinical literature, public comments, and TEP feedback informed full measure specifications.

Conclusions: The evolution of diabetes technology reflects the need to shift diabetes quality of care. The measure concepts will be tested in a flexible pilot setting to understand the future of diabetes care and communicate the value of CGM to people with diabetes, providers, and payers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信