场景布局的预测处理依赖于自然景深。

IF 4.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Marco Gandolfo, Hendrik Nägele, Marius V Peelen
{"title":"场景布局的预测处理依赖于自然景深。","authors":"Marco Gandolfo,&nbsp;Hendrik Nägele,&nbsp;Marius V Peelen","doi":"10.1177/09567976221140341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Boundary extension is a classic memory illusion in which observers remember more of a scene than was presented. According to predictive-processing accounts, boundary extension reflects the integration of visual input and expectations of what is beyond a scene's boundaries. According to normalization accounts, boundary extension rather reflects one end of a normalization process toward a scene's typically experienced viewing distance, such that close-up views give boundary extension but distant views give boundary contraction. Here, across four experiments (<i>N</i> = 125 adults), we found that boundary extension strongly depends on depth of field, as determined by the aperture settings on a camera. Photographs with naturalistic depth of field led to larger boundary extension than photographs with unnaturalistic depth of field, even when distant views were shown. We propose that boundary extension reflects a predictive mechanism with adaptive value that is strongest for naturalistic views of scenes. The current findings indicate that depth of field is an important variable to consider in the study of scene perception and memory.</p>","PeriodicalId":20745,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Science","volume":"34 3","pages":"394-405"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Processing of Scene Layout Depends on Naturalistic Depth of Field.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Gandolfo,&nbsp;Hendrik Nägele,&nbsp;Marius V Peelen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09567976221140341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Boundary extension is a classic memory illusion in which observers remember more of a scene than was presented. According to predictive-processing accounts, boundary extension reflects the integration of visual input and expectations of what is beyond a scene's boundaries. According to normalization accounts, boundary extension rather reflects one end of a normalization process toward a scene's typically experienced viewing distance, such that close-up views give boundary extension but distant views give boundary contraction. Here, across four experiments (<i>N</i> = 125 adults), we found that boundary extension strongly depends on depth of field, as determined by the aperture settings on a camera. Photographs with naturalistic depth of field led to larger boundary extension than photographs with unnaturalistic depth of field, even when distant views were shown. We propose that boundary extension reflects a predictive mechanism with adaptive value that is strongest for naturalistic views of scenes. The current findings indicate that depth of field is an important variable to consider in the study of scene perception and memory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Science\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"394-405\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976221140341\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976221140341","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

边界扩展是一种经典的记忆错觉,在这种错觉中,观察者记住的场景比呈现的场景更多。根据预测处理的说法,边界扩展反映了视觉输入和对场景边界之外的期望的整合。根据归一化的说法,边界扩展反映了对场景典型观看距离的归一化过程的一端,例如近距离视图给出边界扩展,而远距离视图给出边界收缩。在这里,通过四个实验(N = 125个成年人),我们发现边界扩展在很大程度上取决于景深,这是由相机的光圈设置决定的。具有自然景深的照片比具有非自然景深的照片导致更大的边界延伸,即使在显示远处的视图时也是如此。我们认为,边界扩展反映了一种具有自适应价值的预测机制,这种机制对于场景的自然主义观点来说是最强的。目前的研究结果表明,景深是研究场景感知和记忆时需要考虑的重要变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictive Processing of Scene Layout Depends on Naturalistic Depth of Field.

Boundary extension is a classic memory illusion in which observers remember more of a scene than was presented. According to predictive-processing accounts, boundary extension reflects the integration of visual input and expectations of what is beyond a scene's boundaries. According to normalization accounts, boundary extension rather reflects one end of a normalization process toward a scene's typically experienced viewing distance, such that close-up views give boundary extension but distant views give boundary contraction. Here, across four experiments (N = 125 adults), we found that boundary extension strongly depends on depth of field, as determined by the aperture settings on a camera. Photographs with naturalistic depth of field led to larger boundary extension than photographs with unnaturalistic depth of field, even when distant views were shown. We propose that boundary extension reflects a predictive mechanism with adaptive value that is strongest for naturalistic views of scenes. The current findings indicate that depth of field is an important variable to consider in the study of scene perception and memory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Science
Psychological Science PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Psychological Science, the flagship journal of The Association for Psychological Science (previously the American Psychological Society), is a leading publication in the field with a citation ranking/impact factor among the top ten worldwide. It publishes authoritative articles covering various domains of psychological science, including brain and behavior, clinical science, cognition, learning and memory, social psychology, and developmental psychology. In addition to full-length articles, the journal features summaries of new research developments and discussions on psychological issues in government and public affairs. "Psychological Science" is published twelve times annually.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信