Laura López-Aybar, Lauren Gonzales, Anxhela Kanani
{"title":"Prosumers 在临床心理学领域的成见体验。","authors":"Laura López-Aybar, Lauren Gonzales, Anxhela Kanani","doi":"10.1037/ser0000765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lived experiences of mental illness and stigmatizing attitudes toward psychiatric diagnoses are common throughout the world. Research demonstrates that clinical psychologists are not exempt from having lived experiences of mental illness, nor experiencing, witnessing and perpetuating stigma. However, no research has examined prosumers' (providers and consumers of mental health services) experiences of witnessing discrimination within the field of clinical psychology. The purpose of this study was to explore prosumer's experiences of stigma within clinical psychology. A total of 175 doctoral level prosumers (graduated <i>N</i> = 39 and <i>N</i> = 136 in-training) completed a mixed-method online survey regarding their stigma experiences within the field. Emergent qualitative themes from grounded theory analyses included: witnessed discrimination (invalidation, over pathologizing, clinical psychologists as experts and training as a breeding ground for stigma, psychological distress, negative feelings related to field), anticipated stigma (agency and identity rejected, degree of acceptance), internalized stigma (perceived competence and social desirability), and stigma resistance (academia in action, engaging communities, comes with a risk, worthwhile). Our findings have implications for the role of clinical psychology in perpetuating stigmatizing views and attitudes toward individuals with lived experiences of mental illness, specifically in-training and academic settings. Further research should strive to evaluate how clinical psychologists, including prosumers, engage in stigma, and the associations between discrimination and other stigma dimensions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prosumers' experiences of stigma dimensions within the clinical psychology field.\",\"authors\":\"Laura López-Aybar, Lauren Gonzales, Anxhela Kanani\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/ser0000765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lived experiences of mental illness and stigmatizing attitudes toward psychiatric diagnoses are common throughout the world. Research demonstrates that clinical psychologists are not exempt from having lived experiences of mental illness, nor experiencing, witnessing and perpetuating stigma. However, no research has examined prosumers' (providers and consumers of mental health services) experiences of witnessing discrimination within the field of clinical psychology. The purpose of this study was to explore prosumer's experiences of stigma within clinical psychology. A total of 175 doctoral level prosumers (graduated <i>N</i> = 39 and <i>N</i> = 136 in-training) completed a mixed-method online survey regarding their stigma experiences within the field. Emergent qualitative themes from grounded theory analyses included: witnessed discrimination (invalidation, over pathologizing, clinical psychologists as experts and training as a breeding ground for stigma, psychological distress, negative feelings related to field), anticipated stigma (agency and identity rejected, degree of acceptance), internalized stigma (perceived competence and social desirability), and stigma resistance (academia in action, engaging communities, comes with a risk, worthwhile). Our findings have implications for the role of clinical psychology in perpetuating stigmatizing views and attitudes toward individuals with lived experiences of mental illness, specifically in-training and academic settings. Further research should strive to evaluate how clinical psychologists, including prosumers, engage in stigma, and the associations between discrimination and other stigma dimensions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Services\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000765\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000765","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
心理疾病的亲身经历和对精神病诊断的轻蔑态度在全世界都很普遍。研究表明,临床心理学家也不例外,他们也有精神疾病的生活经历,也经历、目睹并延续着污名化。然而,在临床心理学领域,还没有研究考察过消费者(心理健康服务的提供者和消费者)目睹歧视的经历。本研究的目的是探究临床心理学领域的消费者的成见经历。共有 175 名博士水平的临床心理学从业者(已毕业人数=39,在读人数=136)完成了一项混合方法在线调查,内容涉及他们在临床心理学领域的污名化经历。基础理论分析得出的新定性主题包括:目睹的歧视(无效、过度病理化、临床心理学家作为专家和培训是成见的温床、心理困扰、与该领域相关的负面情绪)、预期的成见(机构和身份被拒绝、接受程度)、内化的成见(感知能力和社会期望值)以及成见抵制(学术界在行动、参与社区、有风险、有价值)。我们的研究结果对临床心理学在延续对有精神疾病生活经历的人的污名化观点和态度方面所扮演的角色有一定的影响,特别是在培训和学术环境中。进一步的研究应致力于评估临床心理学家(包括专业心理学家)如何参与污名化,以及歧视与其他污名化维度之间的关联。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
Prosumers' experiences of stigma dimensions within the clinical psychology field.
Lived experiences of mental illness and stigmatizing attitudes toward psychiatric diagnoses are common throughout the world. Research demonstrates that clinical psychologists are not exempt from having lived experiences of mental illness, nor experiencing, witnessing and perpetuating stigma. However, no research has examined prosumers' (providers and consumers of mental health services) experiences of witnessing discrimination within the field of clinical psychology. The purpose of this study was to explore prosumer's experiences of stigma within clinical psychology. A total of 175 doctoral level prosumers (graduated N = 39 and N = 136 in-training) completed a mixed-method online survey regarding their stigma experiences within the field. Emergent qualitative themes from grounded theory analyses included: witnessed discrimination (invalidation, over pathologizing, clinical psychologists as experts and training as a breeding ground for stigma, psychological distress, negative feelings related to field), anticipated stigma (agency and identity rejected, degree of acceptance), internalized stigma (perceived competence and social desirability), and stigma resistance (academia in action, engaging communities, comes with a risk, worthwhile). Our findings have implications for the role of clinical psychology in perpetuating stigmatizing views and attitudes toward individuals with lived experiences of mental illness, specifically in-training and academic settings. Further research should strive to evaluate how clinical psychologists, including prosumers, engage in stigma, and the associations between discrimination and other stigma dimensions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.