微创钢板固定术治疗锁骨骨折。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Christian Michelitsch, Frank Beeres, Marco D Burkhard, Philipp F Stillhard, Reto Babst, Christoph Sommer
{"title":"微创钢板固定术治疗锁骨骨折。","authors":"Christian Michelitsch,&nbsp;Frank Beeres,&nbsp;Marco D Burkhard,&nbsp;Philipp F Stillhard,&nbsp;Reto Babst,&nbsp;Christoph Sommer","doi":"10.1007/s00064-023-00798-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Treatment of comminuted clavicle shaft fractures with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO).</p><p><strong>Indications: </strong>Multifragmentary (≥ 2 intermediate fragments) clavicle shaft fractures with no need for anatomical reduction (AO 15.2B and 15.2C). Even simple fractures (AO 15.2A) with significant soft tissue injuries Tscherne grade I-III are suitable.</p><p><strong>Contraindications: </strong>Medial or lateral clavicle fractures as well as simple fracture pattern where anatomical reduction is indispensable.</p><p><strong>Surgical technique: </strong>Short incision over the medial and lateral end of the main fracture fragments. Either medial or lateral epiperosteal plate insertion. Under image intensifier guidance, the plate is centered either superior or anteroinferior on the clavicle and fixed with a compression wire temporarily (alternatively by a cortical screw) in one of the most lateral holes. Fracture reduction (axis, length, and rotation) over the plate and preliminary fixation medially. After correct reduction has been achieved, further cortical screws and/or locking head screws can be inserted (lag before locking screws). Relative stability is achieved by applying a bridging technique.</p><p><strong>Postoperative management: </strong>No immobilization is needed. Patients are encouraged to perform functional rehabilitation with active and passive physical therapy. Loading is increased according to radiological signs of bony consolidation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a retrospective evaluation from 2001-2021, 1128 clavicle osteosyntheses were performed, of which 908 (80.5%) were treated with plate osteosynthesis and 220 (19.5%) with titanium elastic nail (TEN). Of the 908 plate osteosyntheses, 43 (4.7%) were performed with the MIPO approach. Finally, 42 patients (35 men and 7 women; mean age of 44 ± 15 years) with 43 clavicle shaft fractures were analyzed. The operation was accomplished in 63 ± 28 min, and average fluoroscopy time was 45 ± 42 s. A collective of 27 patients could be evaluated after a median follow-up of 14 months (range 1-51 months). In all, 26 fractures healed in a timely manner. In 1 patient a pseudarthrosis occurred which was treated with re-osteosynthesis and cancellous bone grafting in an open technique. Another patient revealed a wound complication with need of operative wound revision 6 weeks after the index surgery. Further postoperative course was uneventful in both patients. All were pain-free and able to return to work. After an average of 17 ± 8 months, 18 hardware removals (66.7%) were performed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54677,"journal":{"name":"Operative Orthopadie Und Traumatologie","volume":"35 2","pages":"92-99"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for clavicle fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Christian Michelitsch,&nbsp;Frank Beeres,&nbsp;Marco D Burkhard,&nbsp;Philipp F Stillhard,&nbsp;Reto Babst,&nbsp;Christoph Sommer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00064-023-00798-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Treatment of comminuted clavicle shaft fractures with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO).</p><p><strong>Indications: </strong>Multifragmentary (≥ 2 intermediate fragments) clavicle shaft fractures with no need for anatomical reduction (AO 15.2B and 15.2C). Even simple fractures (AO 15.2A) with significant soft tissue injuries Tscherne grade I-III are suitable.</p><p><strong>Contraindications: </strong>Medial or lateral clavicle fractures as well as simple fracture pattern where anatomical reduction is indispensable.</p><p><strong>Surgical technique: </strong>Short incision over the medial and lateral end of the main fracture fragments. Either medial or lateral epiperosteal plate insertion. Under image intensifier guidance, the plate is centered either superior or anteroinferior on the clavicle and fixed with a compression wire temporarily (alternatively by a cortical screw) in one of the most lateral holes. Fracture reduction (axis, length, and rotation) over the plate and preliminary fixation medially. After correct reduction has been achieved, further cortical screws and/or locking head screws can be inserted (lag before locking screws). Relative stability is achieved by applying a bridging technique.</p><p><strong>Postoperative management: </strong>No immobilization is needed. Patients are encouraged to perform functional rehabilitation with active and passive physical therapy. Loading is increased according to radiological signs of bony consolidation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a retrospective evaluation from 2001-2021, 1128 clavicle osteosyntheses were performed, of which 908 (80.5%) were treated with plate osteosynthesis and 220 (19.5%) with titanium elastic nail (TEN). Of the 908 plate osteosyntheses, 43 (4.7%) were performed with the MIPO approach. Finally, 42 patients (35 men and 7 women; mean age of 44 ± 15 years) with 43 clavicle shaft fractures were analyzed. The operation was accomplished in 63 ± 28 min, and average fluoroscopy time was 45 ± 42 s. A collective of 27 patients could be evaluated after a median follow-up of 14 months (range 1-51 months). In all, 26 fractures healed in a timely manner. In 1 patient a pseudarthrosis occurred which was treated with re-osteosynthesis and cancellous bone grafting in an open technique. Another patient revealed a wound complication with need of operative wound revision 6 weeks after the index surgery. Further postoperative course was uneventful in both patients. All were pain-free and able to return to work. After an average of 17 ± 8 months, 18 hardware removals (66.7%) were performed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operative Orthopadie Und Traumatologie\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"92-99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operative Orthopadie Und Traumatologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-023-00798-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative Orthopadie Und Traumatologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-023-00798-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:微创钢板内固定(MIPO)治疗粉碎性锁骨干骨折。适应症:多碎片性(≥ 2个中间碎片)锁骨干骨折,无需解剖复位(AO 15.2B和15.2C)。即使单纯骨折(AO 15.2A)伴有明显的软组织损伤(Tscherne分级I-III)也适用。禁忌症:锁骨内侧或外侧骨折以及单纯性骨折,需要解剖复位。手术技术:在主要骨折碎片的内侧和外侧端进行短切口。内侧或外侧骨外钢板插入。在图像增强器引导下,将钢板置于锁骨上或前下居中,在最外侧的一个孔内用压缩丝暂时固定(或用皮质螺钉)。骨折复位(轴、长度和旋转)在钢板上,中间初步固定。在实现正确复位后,可以插入更多皮质螺钉和/或锁定螺钉(锁定螺钉前的延迟)。通过桥接技术实现了相对稳定性。术后处理:无需固定。鼓励患者通过主动和被动物理治疗进行功能康复。根据骨实变的放射学征象,负荷增加。结果:在2001-2021年的回顾性评估中,进行了1128例锁骨内固定,其中908例(80.5%)采用钢板内固定,220例(19.5%)采用钛弹性钉(TEN)。908例钢板内固定中,43例(4.7%)采用MIPO入路。最终42例患者(男35例,女7例;平均年龄44岁( ±15岁),锁骨干骨折43例。手术时间为63 ±28 min,平均透视时间为45 ±42 s。在中位随访14个月(范围1-51个月)后,共有27例患者可进行评估。总共有26处骨折及时愈合。1例患者发生假关节,采用开放技术进行再骨合成和松质骨移植。另一位患者在指数手术后6周出现伤口并发症,需要手术修复伤口。两例患者术后进展顺利。所有人都没有疼痛,能够重返工作岗位。平均17 ±8个月后,18例(66.7%)行硬体清除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for clavicle fractures.

Objective: Treatment of comminuted clavicle shaft fractures with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO).

Indications: Multifragmentary (≥ 2 intermediate fragments) clavicle shaft fractures with no need for anatomical reduction (AO 15.2B and 15.2C). Even simple fractures (AO 15.2A) with significant soft tissue injuries Tscherne grade I-III are suitable.

Contraindications: Medial or lateral clavicle fractures as well as simple fracture pattern where anatomical reduction is indispensable.

Surgical technique: Short incision over the medial and lateral end of the main fracture fragments. Either medial or lateral epiperosteal plate insertion. Under image intensifier guidance, the plate is centered either superior or anteroinferior on the clavicle and fixed with a compression wire temporarily (alternatively by a cortical screw) in one of the most lateral holes. Fracture reduction (axis, length, and rotation) over the plate and preliminary fixation medially. After correct reduction has been achieved, further cortical screws and/or locking head screws can be inserted (lag before locking screws). Relative stability is achieved by applying a bridging technique.

Postoperative management: No immobilization is needed. Patients are encouraged to perform functional rehabilitation with active and passive physical therapy. Loading is increased according to radiological signs of bony consolidation.

Results: In a retrospective evaluation from 2001-2021, 1128 clavicle osteosyntheses were performed, of which 908 (80.5%) were treated with plate osteosynthesis and 220 (19.5%) with titanium elastic nail (TEN). Of the 908 plate osteosyntheses, 43 (4.7%) were performed with the MIPO approach. Finally, 42 patients (35 men and 7 women; mean age of 44 ± 15 years) with 43 clavicle shaft fractures were analyzed. The operation was accomplished in 63 ± 28 min, and average fluoroscopy time was 45 ± 42 s. A collective of 27 patients could be evaluated after a median follow-up of 14 months (range 1-51 months). In all, 26 fractures healed in a timely manner. In 1 patient a pseudarthrosis occurred which was treated with re-osteosynthesis and cancellous bone grafting in an open technique. Another patient revealed a wound complication with need of operative wound revision 6 weeks after the index surgery. Further postoperative course was uneventful in both patients. All were pain-free and able to return to work. After an average of 17 ± 8 months, 18 hardware removals (66.7%) were performed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedics and Traumatology is directed toward all orthopedic surgeons, trauma-tologists, hand surgeons, specialists in sports injuries, orthopedics and rheumatology as well as gene-al surgeons who require access to reliable information on current operative methods to ensure the quality of patient advice, preoperative planning, and postoperative care. The journal presents established and new operative procedures in uniformly structured and extensively illustrated contributions. All aspects are presented step-by-step from indications, contraindications, patient education, and preparation of the operation right through to postoperative care. The advantages and disadvantages, possible complications, deficiencies and risks of the methods as well as significant results with their evaluation criteria are discussed. To allow the reader to assess the outcome, results are detailed and based on internationally recognized scoring systems. Orthopedics and Traumatology facilitates effective advancement and further education for all those active in both special and conservative fields of orthopedics, traumatology, and general surgery, offers sup-port for therapeutic decision-making, and provides – more than 30 years after its first publication – constantly expanding and up-to-date teaching on operative techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信