物质使用障碍发展时间过程中的性别差异:关注远程应对效应。

IF 19.3 1区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacological Reviews Pub Date : 2023-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-12 DOI:10.1124/pharmrev.121.000361
Eleanor Blair Towers, Ivy L Williams, Emaan I Qillawala, Emilie F Rissman, Wendy J Lynch
{"title":"物质使用障碍发展时间过程中的性别差异:关注远程应对效应。","authors":"Eleanor Blair Towers, Ivy L Williams, Emaan I Qillawala, Emilie F Rissman, Wendy J Lynch","doi":"10.1124/pharmrev.121.000361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sex/gender effects have been demonstrated for multiple aspects of addiction, with one of the most commonly cited examples being the \"telescoping effect\" where women meet criteria and/or seek treatment of substance use disorder (SUD) after fewer years of drug use as compared with men. This phenomenon has been reported for multiple drug classes including opioids, psychostimulants, alcohol, and cannabis, as well as nonpharmacological addictions, such as gambling. However, there are some inconsistent reports that show either no difference between men and women or opposite effects and a faster course to addiction in men than women. Thus, the goals of this review are to evaluate evidence for and against the telescoping effect in women and to determine the conditions/populations for which the telescoping effect is most relevant. We also discuss evidence from preclinical studies, which strongly support the validity of the telescoping effect and show that female animals develop addiction-like features (e.g., compulsive drug use, an enhanced motivation for the drug, and enhanced drug-craving/vulnerability to relapse) more readily than male animals. We also discuss biologic factors that may contribute to the telescoping effect, such as ovarian hormones, and its neurobiological basis focusing on the mesolimbic dopamine reward pathway and the corticomesolimbic glutamatergic pathway considering the critical roles these pathways play in the rewarding/reinforcing effects of addictive drugs and SUD. We conclude with future research directions, including intervention strategies to prevent the development of SUD in women. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: One of the most widely cited gender/sex differences in substance use disorder (SUD) is the \"telescoping effect,\" which reflects an accelerated course in women versus men for the development and/or seeking treatment for SUD. This review evaluates evidence for and against a telescoping effect drawing upon data from both clinical and preclinical studies. We also discuss the contribution of biological factors and underlying neurobiological mechanisms and highlight potential targets to prevent the development of SUD in women.</p>","PeriodicalId":19780,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological Reviews","volume":"75 2","pages":"217-249"},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9969523/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex/Gender Differences in the Time-Course for the Development of Substance Use Disorder: A Focus on the Telescoping Effect.\",\"authors\":\"Eleanor Blair Towers, Ivy L Williams, Emaan I Qillawala, Emilie F Rissman, Wendy J Lynch\",\"doi\":\"10.1124/pharmrev.121.000361\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sex/gender effects have been demonstrated for multiple aspects of addiction, with one of the most commonly cited examples being the \\\"telescoping effect\\\" where women meet criteria and/or seek treatment of substance use disorder (SUD) after fewer years of drug use as compared with men. This phenomenon has been reported for multiple drug classes including opioids, psychostimulants, alcohol, and cannabis, as well as nonpharmacological addictions, such as gambling. However, there are some inconsistent reports that show either no difference between men and women or opposite effects and a faster course to addiction in men than women. Thus, the goals of this review are to evaluate evidence for and against the telescoping effect in women and to determine the conditions/populations for which the telescoping effect is most relevant. We also discuss evidence from preclinical studies, which strongly support the validity of the telescoping effect and show that female animals develop addiction-like features (e.g., compulsive drug use, an enhanced motivation for the drug, and enhanced drug-craving/vulnerability to relapse) more readily than male animals. We also discuss biologic factors that may contribute to the telescoping effect, such as ovarian hormones, and its neurobiological basis focusing on the mesolimbic dopamine reward pathway and the corticomesolimbic glutamatergic pathway considering the critical roles these pathways play in the rewarding/reinforcing effects of addictive drugs and SUD. We conclude with future research directions, including intervention strategies to prevent the development of SUD in women. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: One of the most widely cited gender/sex differences in substance use disorder (SUD) is the \\\"telescoping effect,\\\" which reflects an accelerated course in women versus men for the development and/or seeking treatment for SUD. This review evaluates evidence for and against a telescoping effect drawing upon data from both clinical and preclinical studies. We also discuss the contribution of biological factors and underlying neurobiological mechanisms and highlight potential targets to prevent the development of SUD in women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacological Reviews\",\"volume\":\"75 2\",\"pages\":\"217-249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9969523/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacological Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1124/pharmrev.121.000361\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/12/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1124/pharmrev.121.000361","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

性/性别效应已被证明适用于成瘾的多个方面,其中最常被引用的例子之一是“伸缩效应”,即女性在与男性相比吸毒年限更短后达到标准和/或寻求药物使用障碍(SUD)的治疗。据报道,这种现象适用于多种药物类别,包括阿片类药物、精神刺激剂、酒精和大麻,以及赌博等非药物成瘾。然而,有一些不一致的报告显示,男性和女性之间没有差异,或者相反的影响,男性比女性成瘾更快。因此,本综述的目的是评估支持和反对女性伸缩效应的证据,并确定伸缩效应最相关的条件/人群。我们还讨论了临床前研究的证据,这些证据有力地支持了伸缩效应的有效性,并表明雌性动物比雄性动物更容易产生成瘾样特征(例如,强迫性药物使用、对药物的动机增强以及对药物的渴望/易复发性增强)。我们还讨论了可能导致伸缩效应的生物因素,如卵巢激素,及其神经生物学基础,重点是中边缘多巴胺奖励途径和皮质-中边缘谷氨酸能途径,考虑到这些途径在成瘾药物和SUD的奖励/增强作用中发挥的关键作用。我们总结了未来的研究方向,包括预防妇女SUD发展的干预策略。意义陈述:物质使用障碍(SUD)中被广泛引用的性别/性别差异之一是“伸缩效应”,它反映了女性与男性在SUD的发展和/或寻求治疗方面的加速过程。这篇综述根据临床和临床前研究的数据评估了支持和反对伸缩效应的证据。我们还讨论了生物学因素和潜在的神经生物学机制的作用,并强调了预防女性SUD发展的潜在靶点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Sex/Gender Differences in the Time-Course for the Development of Substance Use Disorder: A Focus on the Telescoping Effect.

Sex/Gender Differences in the Time-Course for the Development of Substance Use Disorder: A Focus on the Telescoping Effect.

Sex/gender effects have been demonstrated for multiple aspects of addiction, with one of the most commonly cited examples being the "telescoping effect" where women meet criteria and/or seek treatment of substance use disorder (SUD) after fewer years of drug use as compared with men. This phenomenon has been reported for multiple drug classes including opioids, psychostimulants, alcohol, and cannabis, as well as nonpharmacological addictions, such as gambling. However, there are some inconsistent reports that show either no difference between men and women or opposite effects and a faster course to addiction in men than women. Thus, the goals of this review are to evaluate evidence for and against the telescoping effect in women and to determine the conditions/populations for which the telescoping effect is most relevant. We also discuss evidence from preclinical studies, which strongly support the validity of the telescoping effect and show that female animals develop addiction-like features (e.g., compulsive drug use, an enhanced motivation for the drug, and enhanced drug-craving/vulnerability to relapse) more readily than male animals. We also discuss biologic factors that may contribute to the telescoping effect, such as ovarian hormones, and its neurobiological basis focusing on the mesolimbic dopamine reward pathway and the corticomesolimbic glutamatergic pathway considering the critical roles these pathways play in the rewarding/reinforcing effects of addictive drugs and SUD. We conclude with future research directions, including intervention strategies to prevent the development of SUD in women. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: One of the most widely cited gender/sex differences in substance use disorder (SUD) is the "telescoping effect," which reflects an accelerated course in women versus men for the development and/or seeking treatment for SUD. This review evaluates evidence for and against a telescoping effect drawing upon data from both clinical and preclinical studies. We also discuss the contribution of biological factors and underlying neurobiological mechanisms and highlight potential targets to prevent the development of SUD in women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacological Reviews
Pharmacological Reviews 医学-药学
CiteScore
34.70
自引率
0.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Pharmacological Reviews is a highly popular and well-received journal that has a long and rich history of success. It was first published in 1949 and is currently published bimonthly online by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. The journal is indexed or abstracted by various databases, including Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS Previews Database, Biosciences Information Service, Current Contents/Life Sciences, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Index Medicus, Index to Scientific Reviews, Medical Documentation Service, Reference Update, Research Alerts, Science Citation Index, and SciSearch. Pharmacological Reviews offers comprehensive reviews of new pharmacological fields and is able to stay up-to-date with published content. Overall, it is highly regarded by scholars.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信