美国临床肿瘤学会拨款分配的制度差异

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Samer Al Hadidi , Mohammad I. Abu Zaid , Moaath Mustafa Ali
{"title":"美国临床肿瘤学会拨款分配的制度差异","authors":"Samer Al Hadidi ,&nbsp;Mohammad I. Abu Zaid ,&nbsp;Moaath Mustafa Ali","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Disparities in academia are increasingly recognized, but what has historically been underrecognized is the cancer institutional disparities in the distribution of grants. We sought to characterize grants awarded by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ove the last 38 year with focus on grants awarded for career development and professional growth.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used ASCO online database that contains grant and award recipients (1984-December 2021). We included all grants that were awarded for more than one year with $10,000 or more in annual funds.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>More than a third (38%) of all the individual grants were awarded for researchers from four institutions. Career development awards and young investigator awards were awarded for investigators of whom two-thirds were affiliated with a university in one of five states.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is a significant concentration of grants awarded to oncology investigators from a few institutions including grant focused on professional growth (Career development awards and young investigator awards)</p></div><div><h3>Policy statement</h3><p>Institutions such as ASCO may need to facilitate awarding grants and/or providing external mentorship for institutions with low number of previous grants, especially for career development and young investigator grants to help in resolving the current institutional disparities</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutional disparities in the distribution of the American Society of Clinical Oncology grants\",\"authors\":\"Samer Al Hadidi ,&nbsp;Mohammad I. Abu Zaid ,&nbsp;Moaath Mustafa Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Disparities in academia are increasingly recognized, but what has historically been underrecognized is the cancer institutional disparities in the distribution of grants. We sought to characterize grants awarded by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ove the last 38 year with focus on grants awarded for career development and professional growth.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used ASCO online database that contains grant and award recipients (1984-December 2021). We included all grants that were awarded for more than one year with $10,000 or more in annual funds.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>More than a third (38%) of all the individual grants were awarded for researchers from four institutions. Career development awards and young investigator awards were awarded for investigators of whom two-thirds were affiliated with a university in one of five states.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is a significant concentration of grants awarded to oncology investigators from a few institutions including grant focused on professional growth (Career development awards and young investigator awards)</p></div><div><h3>Policy statement</h3><p>Institutions such as ASCO may need to facilitate awarding grants and/or providing external mentorship for institutions with low number of previous grants, especially for career development and young investigator grants to help in resolving the current institutional disparities</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538323000218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538323000218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景学术界的差异越来越得到承认,但历史上被低估的是癌症拨款分配方面的制度差异。我们试图描述美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)在过去38年中授予的资助,重点是为职业发展和专业成长授予的资助。方法我们使用ASCO在线数据库,该数据库包含资助者和获奖者(1984年至2021年12月)。我们包括了所有授予一年以上的年度资金为10000美元或以上的赠款。结果超过三分之一(38%)的个人资助来自四个机构的研究人员。职业发展奖和青年调查员奖授予了其中三分之二隶属于五个州之一的大学的调查员。结论少数机构授予肿瘤学研究人员的资助非常集中,包括专注于专业成长的资助(职业发展奖和年轻研究人员奖)政策声明ASCO等机构可能需要为之前资助数量较少的机构提供资助和/或外部指导,特别是用于职业发展和青年调查员补助金,以帮助解决当前的制度差距
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Institutional disparities in the distribution of the American Society of Clinical Oncology grants

Background

Disparities in academia are increasingly recognized, but what has historically been underrecognized is the cancer institutional disparities in the distribution of grants. We sought to characterize grants awarded by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ove the last 38 year with focus on grants awarded for career development and professional growth.

Methods

We used ASCO online database that contains grant and award recipients (1984-December 2021). We included all grants that were awarded for more than one year with $10,000 or more in annual funds.

Results

More than a third (38%) of all the individual grants were awarded for researchers from four institutions. Career development awards and young investigator awards were awarded for investigators of whom two-thirds were affiliated with a university in one of five states.

Conclusion

There is a significant concentration of grants awarded to oncology investigators from a few institutions including grant focused on professional growth (Career development awards and young investigator awards)

Policy statement

Institutions such as ASCO may need to facilitate awarding grants and/or providing external mentorship for institutions with low number of previous grants, especially for career development and young investigator grants to help in resolving the current institutional disparities

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Policy
Journal of Cancer Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
审稿时长
65 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信