口腔肿瘤犬口腔细菌分离、c反应蛋白测定及血液临床指标的研究。

IF 1.9 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Chanokchon Setthawongsin, Duangdaow Khunbutsri, Sirinun Pisamai, Wuttinun Raksajit, Suchanit Ngamkala, Thitichai Jarudecha, Nattakan Meekhanon, Anudep Rungsipipat
{"title":"口腔肿瘤犬口腔细菌分离、c反应蛋白测定及血液临床指标的研究。","authors":"Chanokchon Setthawongsin,&nbsp;Duangdaow Khunbutsri,&nbsp;Sirinun Pisamai,&nbsp;Wuttinun Raksajit,&nbsp;Suchanit Ngamkala,&nbsp;Thitichai Jarudecha,&nbsp;Nattakan Meekhanon,&nbsp;Anudep Rungsipipat","doi":"10.1155/2023/2582774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Canine oral cancers have a poor prognosis and are related to chronic inflammation. This may pose a risk of secondary bacterial infection. This study aimed to compare the bacteria isolated from oral swab samples, values of C-reactive proteins (CRPs), and clinical blood profiles of dogs with and without oral mass. A total of 36 dogs were divided in three groups: no oral mass (<i>n</i> = 21), oral mass (<i>n</i> = 8), and metastasis groups (<i>n</i> = 7). Significantly, both the clinical groups (the oral mass group and metastasis group) showed anemia, a decrease in the albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR), and an increase in the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), globulin-to-albumin ratio (GAR), CRP, and CRP-to-albumin ratio (CAR) compared to the normal group. CAR showed an increasing trend in the oral mass and metastasis groups (10 times and 100 times, respectively) compared to the no oral mass group (<i>P</i> < 0.001). <i>Neisseria</i> spp. (20.78%) was the main isolated bacteria in all groups. The main genera in the no oral mass group were <i>Neisseria</i> spp. (28.26%), <i>Pasteurella</i> spp. (19.57%), and <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. (19.57%). <i>Neisseria</i> spp., <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp., <i>Klebsiella</i> spp., and <i>Escherichia</i> spp. were found equally (12.5%) in the oral mass group. <i>Escherichia</i> spp. (26.67%), <i>Pseudomonas</i> spp. (13.33%), and <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. (13.33%) were the main genera in the metastasis group. Interestingly, <i>Neisseria</i> spp. decreased in the clinical groups (Fisher's exact = 6.39, <i>P</i>=0.048), and <i>Escherichia</i> spp. increased in the metastasis group (Fisher's exact = 14.00, <i>P</i>=0.002). The difference of oral bacteria in clinical dogs compared to healthy dogs may be related to microbiome alterations, and both the clinical groups showed the increment of inflammatory biomarkers. This suggested that further studies should be conducted on the correlation between the specific bacteria, CRP, blood clinical parameters, and type of canine oral mass.</p>","PeriodicalId":23503,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Medicine International","volume":"2023 ","pages":"2582774"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10060073/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Isolation of Oral Bacteria, Measurement of the C-Reactive Protein, and Blood Clinical Parameters in Dogs with Oral Tumor.\",\"authors\":\"Chanokchon Setthawongsin,&nbsp;Duangdaow Khunbutsri,&nbsp;Sirinun Pisamai,&nbsp;Wuttinun Raksajit,&nbsp;Suchanit Ngamkala,&nbsp;Thitichai Jarudecha,&nbsp;Nattakan Meekhanon,&nbsp;Anudep Rungsipipat\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/2582774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Canine oral cancers have a poor prognosis and are related to chronic inflammation. This may pose a risk of secondary bacterial infection. This study aimed to compare the bacteria isolated from oral swab samples, values of C-reactive proteins (CRPs), and clinical blood profiles of dogs with and without oral mass. A total of 36 dogs were divided in three groups: no oral mass (<i>n</i> = 21), oral mass (<i>n</i> = 8), and metastasis groups (<i>n</i> = 7). Significantly, both the clinical groups (the oral mass group and metastasis group) showed anemia, a decrease in the albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR), and an increase in the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), globulin-to-albumin ratio (GAR), CRP, and CRP-to-albumin ratio (CAR) compared to the normal group. CAR showed an increasing trend in the oral mass and metastasis groups (10 times and 100 times, respectively) compared to the no oral mass group (<i>P</i> < 0.001). <i>Neisseria</i> spp. (20.78%) was the main isolated bacteria in all groups. The main genera in the no oral mass group were <i>Neisseria</i> spp. (28.26%), <i>Pasteurella</i> spp. (19.57%), and <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. (19.57%). <i>Neisseria</i> spp., <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp., <i>Klebsiella</i> spp., and <i>Escherichia</i> spp. were found equally (12.5%) in the oral mass group. <i>Escherichia</i> spp. (26.67%), <i>Pseudomonas</i> spp. (13.33%), and <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. (13.33%) were the main genera in the metastasis group. Interestingly, <i>Neisseria</i> spp. decreased in the clinical groups (Fisher's exact = 6.39, <i>P</i>=0.048), and <i>Escherichia</i> spp. increased in the metastasis group (Fisher's exact = 14.00, <i>P</i>=0.002). The difference of oral bacteria in clinical dogs compared to healthy dogs may be related to microbiome alterations, and both the clinical groups showed the increment of inflammatory biomarkers. This suggested that further studies should be conducted on the correlation between the specific bacteria, CRP, blood clinical parameters, and type of canine oral mass.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary Medicine International\",\"volume\":\"2023 \",\"pages\":\"2582774\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10060073/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary Medicine International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2582774\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Medicine International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2582774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

犬口腔癌预后差,与慢性炎症有关。这可能会造成继发性细菌感染的风险。本研究旨在比较从口腔拭子样本中分离的细菌、c反应蛋白(crp)值以及有无口腔肿块的狗的临床血液特征。36只犬分为3组:无口腔肿块组(n = 21)、口腔肿块组(n = 8)和转移组(n = 7)。值得注意的是,两个临床组(口腔肿块组和转移组)均出现贫血,白蛋白与球蛋白比(AGR)降低,中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比(NLR)、球蛋白与白蛋白比(GAR)、CRP和CRP与白蛋白比(CAR)升高。与无口腔肿块组相比,口腔肿块组和口腔转移组的CAR呈增加趋势(分别为10倍和100倍)(P < 0.001)。各组分离的主要细菌为奈瑟菌(20.78%)。无口腔肿块组主要属为奈瑟菌属(28.26%)、巴氏杆菌属(19.57%)和葡萄球菌属(19.57%)。口腔团块组感染奈瑟氏菌、葡萄球菌、克雷伯氏菌和埃希氏菌的比例相同(12.5%)。转移组以埃希菌属(26.67%)、假单胞菌属(13.33%)和葡萄球菌属(13.33%)为主。有趣的是,临床组奈瑟氏菌数量减少(Fisher’s exact = 6.39, P=0.048),而转移组埃希氏菌数量增加(Fisher’s exact = 14.00, P=0.002)。临床犬与健康犬口腔细菌的差异可能与微生物组的改变有关,两组临床犬均表现出炎症生物标志物的增加。提示需要进一步研究特定细菌、CRP、血液临床参数与犬口腔肿块类型的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Isolation of Oral Bacteria, Measurement of the C-Reactive Protein, and Blood Clinical Parameters in Dogs with Oral Tumor.

Isolation of Oral Bacteria, Measurement of the C-Reactive Protein, and Blood Clinical Parameters in Dogs with Oral Tumor.

Isolation of Oral Bacteria, Measurement of the C-Reactive Protein, and Blood Clinical Parameters in Dogs with Oral Tumor.

Isolation of Oral Bacteria, Measurement of the C-Reactive Protein, and Blood Clinical Parameters in Dogs with Oral Tumor.

Canine oral cancers have a poor prognosis and are related to chronic inflammation. This may pose a risk of secondary bacterial infection. This study aimed to compare the bacteria isolated from oral swab samples, values of C-reactive proteins (CRPs), and clinical blood profiles of dogs with and without oral mass. A total of 36 dogs were divided in three groups: no oral mass (n = 21), oral mass (n = 8), and metastasis groups (n = 7). Significantly, both the clinical groups (the oral mass group and metastasis group) showed anemia, a decrease in the albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR), and an increase in the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), globulin-to-albumin ratio (GAR), CRP, and CRP-to-albumin ratio (CAR) compared to the normal group. CAR showed an increasing trend in the oral mass and metastasis groups (10 times and 100 times, respectively) compared to the no oral mass group (P < 0.001). Neisseria spp. (20.78%) was the main isolated bacteria in all groups. The main genera in the no oral mass group were Neisseria spp. (28.26%), Pasteurella spp. (19.57%), and Staphylococcus spp. (19.57%). Neisseria spp., Staphylococcus spp., Klebsiella spp., and Escherichia spp. were found equally (12.5%) in the oral mass group. Escherichia spp. (26.67%), Pseudomonas spp. (13.33%), and Staphylococcus spp. (13.33%) were the main genera in the metastasis group. Interestingly, Neisseria spp. decreased in the clinical groups (Fisher's exact = 6.39, P=0.048), and Escherichia spp. increased in the metastasis group (Fisher's exact = 14.00, P=0.002). The difference of oral bacteria in clinical dogs compared to healthy dogs may be related to microbiome alterations, and both the clinical groups showed the increment of inflammatory biomarkers. This suggested that further studies should be conducted on the correlation between the specific bacteria, CRP, blood clinical parameters, and type of canine oral mass.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary Medicine International
Veterinary Medicine International Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
55
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Medicine International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles and review articles in all areas of veterinary research. The journal will consider articles on the biological basis of disease, as well as diagnosis, prevention, treatment, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信