{"title":"两种不同装置测量儿童血压的可比性","authors":"Lukas Streese, Christoph Hauser, Henner Hanssen","doi":"10.1111/cpf.12802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Higher blood pressure levels are associated with vascular dysfunction as early as childhood. Here, we aim to compare two blood pressure devices for use in childhood populations within a school setting to screen for elevated blood pressure in children.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arteriolar pressure (MAP) as well as heart rate (HR) were measured with the validated Oscillomate 9002 and Mindray VS-900 in 82 randomly selected children between 10 and 12 years taking part in the EXAMIN YOUTH study in 2020. Measurements were performed after 5 min at rest in a sitting position in the school environment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Both devices showed strong correlations for systolic (<i>r</i> = 0.62, <i>t</i>[80] = 7, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (<i>r</i> = 0.73, <i>t</i>[80] = 9.52, <i>p</i> < 0.001), MAP (<i>r</i> = 0.75, <i>t</i>[80] = 10.22, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and HR (<i>r</i> = 0.89, <i>t</i>[79] = 17.77, <i>p</i> < 0.001). There was no evidence for a statistically significant difference of both devices for systolic (110 ± 9 mmHg vs. 111 ± 9 mmHg, <i>p</i> = 0.574), diastolic blood pressure (67 ± 9 mmHg vs. 66 ± 9 mmHg, <i>p</i> = 0.301) as well as MAP (81 ± 8 mmHg vs. 80 ± 8 mmHg, <i>p</i> = 0.400) and HR (83 ± 12 BPM vs. 83 ± 11 BPM, <i>p</i> = 0.994).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Both devices, the older Oscillomate 9002 and the current Mindray VS-900 showed good agreement for the measurement of blood pressure in school children. It therefore appears to be feasible to measure childhood blood pressure with either device or replace one device with another in prospective long-term studies or screening programmes as long as both are validated for use in children.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10504,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparability of childhood blood pressure measurements with two different devices\",\"authors\":\"Lukas Streese, Christoph Hauser, Henner Hanssen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cpf.12802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Higher blood pressure levels are associated with vascular dysfunction as early as childhood. Here, we aim to compare two blood pressure devices for use in childhood populations within a school setting to screen for elevated blood pressure in children.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arteriolar pressure (MAP) as well as heart rate (HR) were measured with the validated Oscillomate 9002 and Mindray VS-900 in 82 randomly selected children between 10 and 12 years taking part in the EXAMIN YOUTH study in 2020. Measurements were performed after 5 min at rest in a sitting position in the school environment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Both devices showed strong correlations for systolic (<i>r</i> = 0.62, <i>t</i>[80] = 7, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (<i>r</i> = 0.73, <i>t</i>[80] = 9.52, <i>p</i> < 0.001), MAP (<i>r</i> = 0.75, <i>t</i>[80] = 10.22, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and HR (<i>r</i> = 0.89, <i>t</i>[79] = 17.77, <i>p</i> < 0.001). There was no evidence for a statistically significant difference of both devices for systolic (110 ± 9 mmHg vs. 111 ± 9 mmHg, <i>p</i> = 0.574), diastolic blood pressure (67 ± 9 mmHg vs. 66 ± 9 mmHg, <i>p</i> = 0.301) as well as MAP (81 ± 8 mmHg vs. 80 ± 8 mmHg, <i>p</i> = 0.400) and HR (83 ± 12 BPM vs. 83 ± 11 BPM, <i>p</i> = 0.994).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Both devices, the older Oscillomate 9002 and the current Mindray VS-900 showed good agreement for the measurement of blood pressure in school children. It therefore appears to be feasible to measure childhood blood pressure with either device or replace one device with another in prospective long-term studies or screening programmes as long as both are validated for use in children.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cpf.12802\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cpf.12802","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
高血压早在儿童时期就与血管功能障碍有关。在这里,我们的目的是比较两种血压设备用于儿童人群在学校设置筛选儿童血压升高。方法:在2020年的EXAMIN YOUTH研究中,随机选择82名10 - 12岁的儿童,使用经过验证的Oscillomate 9002和Mindray VS-900测量收缩压、舒张压、平均小动脉压(MAP)和心率(HR)。在学校环境中静坐休息5分钟后进行测量。结果两种装置在收缩压(r = 0.62, t[80] = 7, p < 0.001)、舒张压(r = 0.73, t[80] = 9.52, p < 0.001)、MAP (r = 0.75, t[80] = 10.22, p < 0.001)和HR (r = 0.89, t[79] = 17.77, p < 0.001)方面均表现出较强的相关性。两种装置在收缩压(110±9 mmHg vs 111±9 mmHg, p = 0.574)、舒张压(67±9 mmHg vs 66±9 mmHg, p = 0.301)、MAP(81±8 mmHg vs 80±8 mmHg, p = 0.400)和心率(83±12 BPM vs 83±11 BPM, p = 0.994)方面无统计学差异。这两种设备,旧的振荡9002和当前的迈瑞VS-900在测量学龄儿童血压方面表现出良好的一致性。因此,在前瞻性长期研究或筛查计划中,只要两种设备都被证实适用于儿童,用其中一种设备测量儿童血压或用另一种设备替换一种设备似乎是可行的。
Comparability of childhood blood pressure measurements with two different devices
Introduction
Higher blood pressure levels are associated with vascular dysfunction as early as childhood. Here, we aim to compare two blood pressure devices for use in childhood populations within a school setting to screen for elevated blood pressure in children.
Methods
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arteriolar pressure (MAP) as well as heart rate (HR) were measured with the validated Oscillomate 9002 and Mindray VS-900 in 82 randomly selected children between 10 and 12 years taking part in the EXAMIN YOUTH study in 2020. Measurements were performed after 5 min at rest in a sitting position in the school environment.
Results
Both devices showed strong correlations for systolic (r = 0.62, t[80] = 7, p < 0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (r = 0.73, t[80] = 9.52, p < 0.001), MAP (r = 0.75, t[80] = 10.22, p < 0.001) and HR (r = 0.89, t[79] = 17.77, p < 0.001). There was no evidence for a statistically significant difference of both devices for systolic (110 ± 9 mmHg vs. 111 ± 9 mmHg, p = 0.574), diastolic blood pressure (67 ± 9 mmHg vs. 66 ± 9 mmHg, p = 0.301) as well as MAP (81 ± 8 mmHg vs. 80 ± 8 mmHg, p = 0.400) and HR (83 ± 12 BPM vs. 83 ± 11 BPM, p = 0.994).
Discussion
Both devices, the older Oscillomate 9002 and the current Mindray VS-900 showed good agreement for the measurement of blood pressure in school children. It therefore appears to be feasible to measure childhood blood pressure with either device or replace one device with another in prospective long-term studies or screening programmes as long as both are validated for use in children.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging publishes reports on clinical and experimental research pertinent to human physiology in health and disease. The scope of the Journal is very broad, covering all aspects of the regulatory system in the cardiovascular, renal and pulmonary systems with special emphasis on methodological aspects. The focus for the journal is, however, work that has potential clinical relevance. The Journal also features review articles on recent front-line research within these fields of interest.
Covered by the major abstracting services including Current Contents and Science Citation Index, Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging plays an important role in providing effective and productive communication among clinical physiologists world-wide.