精神病和精神分裂症心理治疗的国际接受率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Susanna Burgess-Barr, Emily Nicholas, Bethany Venus, Niharika Singh, Abigail Nethercott, Gemma Taylor, Pamela Jacobsen
{"title":"精神病和精神分裂症心理治疗的国际接受率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Susanna Burgess-Barr,&nbsp;Emily Nicholas,&nbsp;Bethany Venus,&nbsp;Niharika Singh,&nbsp;Abigail Nethercott,&nbsp;Gemma Taylor,&nbsp;Pamela Jacobsen","doi":"10.1186/s13033-023-00576-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>International clinical practice guidelines commonly recommend the provision of psychological therapies for psychosis and schizophrenia as an adjunct to medication. However, access to recommended therapies in routine clinical practice is limited. The aim of this review was to synthesise the available data on the provision of recommended psychological therapies for psychosis and schizophrenia across international mental health systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases (PsychINFO, Pubmed and EMBASE) were searched for audits, service evaluation projects, or surveys, which reported data on rates of offer or receipt of any recommended psychological therapy or therapeutic intervention as part of routine clinical care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two eligible studies from 9 countries were identified (N participants = 79,407). The most commonly recommended therapies in national guidelines were Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy for Psychosis (CBTp) and Family Interventions (FI). The overall pooled prevalence of rate of receipt of CBTp was 24% [95% CI 0.15-0.32] based on 15 studies (N = 42,494), with a higher rate of receipt of therapy found when pooling data from Early Intervention services only (41% [95% CI 0.21-0.60], 6 studies, N = 11,068). The overall pooled prevalence of rate of receipt of FI was 30% [95% CI 0.22-0.37] based on 14 studies (N = 13,863).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall rates of receipt of recommended psychological therapies for psychosis were low across the 9 countries data were available for in this review. However, there were high rates of heterogeneity across studies, meaning that pooled estimates should be interpreted with caution. Sources of heterogeneity included different service settings (e.g. early intervention vs. non-early intervention services), and varying methods used to collect the data (e.g. audit of electronic health records vs. self-report etc.). There were no available data from the continents of South America, Asia, or Africa, meaning that a truly global picture of provision of psychological therapies for psychosis and schizophrenia is currently lacking.</p>","PeriodicalId":47752,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","volume":"17 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10064673/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International rates of receipt of psychological therapy for psychosis and schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Susanna Burgess-Barr,&nbsp;Emily Nicholas,&nbsp;Bethany Venus,&nbsp;Niharika Singh,&nbsp;Abigail Nethercott,&nbsp;Gemma Taylor,&nbsp;Pamela Jacobsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13033-023-00576-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>International clinical practice guidelines commonly recommend the provision of psychological therapies for psychosis and schizophrenia as an adjunct to medication. However, access to recommended therapies in routine clinical practice is limited. The aim of this review was to synthesise the available data on the provision of recommended psychological therapies for psychosis and schizophrenia across international mental health systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases (PsychINFO, Pubmed and EMBASE) were searched for audits, service evaluation projects, or surveys, which reported data on rates of offer or receipt of any recommended psychological therapy or therapeutic intervention as part of routine clinical care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two eligible studies from 9 countries were identified (N participants = 79,407). The most commonly recommended therapies in national guidelines were Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy for Psychosis (CBTp) and Family Interventions (FI). The overall pooled prevalence of rate of receipt of CBTp was 24% [95% CI 0.15-0.32] based on 15 studies (N = 42,494), with a higher rate of receipt of therapy found when pooling data from Early Intervention services only (41% [95% CI 0.21-0.60], 6 studies, N = 11,068). The overall pooled prevalence of rate of receipt of FI was 30% [95% CI 0.22-0.37] based on 14 studies (N = 13,863).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall rates of receipt of recommended psychological therapies for psychosis were low across the 9 countries data were available for in this review. However, there were high rates of heterogeneity across studies, meaning that pooled estimates should be interpreted with caution. Sources of heterogeneity included different service settings (e.g. early intervention vs. non-early intervention services), and varying methods used to collect the data (e.g. audit of electronic health records vs. self-report etc.). There were no available data from the continents of South America, Asia, or Africa, meaning that a truly global picture of provision of psychological therapies for psychosis and schizophrenia is currently lacking.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Systems\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10064673/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-023-00576-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-023-00576-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:国际临床实践指南普遍推荐精神病和精神分裂症的心理治疗作为药物治疗的辅助手段。然而,在常规临床实践中,推荐的治疗方法是有限的。本综述的目的是综合国际精神卫生系统中推荐的精神病和精神分裂症心理治疗的现有数据。方法:检索电子数据库(PsychINFO、Pubmed和EMBASE),检索审计、服务评估项目或调查,这些数据报告了作为常规临床护理一部分的任何推荐心理治疗或治疗干预的提供率或接受率。结果:确定了来自9个国家的22项符合条件的研究(N参与者= 79,407)。国家指南中最常推荐的治疗方法是精神病认知行为治疗(CBTp)和家庭干预(FI)。基于15项研究(N = 42,494), CBTp接受率的总体合并患病率为24% [95% CI 0.15-0.32],仅合并早期干预服务的数据时,发现治疗接受率更高(41% [95% CI 0.21-0.60], 6项研究,N = 11068)。基于14项研究(N = 13,863), FI接受率的总体合并患病率为30% [95% CI 0.22-0.37]。结论:在本综述中可获得的9个国家数据中,精神病推荐心理治疗的总体接受率较低。然而,各研究之间存在很高的异质性,这意味着汇总估计应谨慎解释。异质性的来源包括不同的服务环境(如早期干预与非早期干预服务)和收集数据所用的不同方法(如电子健康记录审计与自我报告审计等)。没有来自南美洲、亚洲或非洲大陆的可用数据,这意味着目前缺乏精神病和精神分裂症心理治疗提供的真正全球图景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

International rates of receipt of psychological therapy for psychosis and schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

International rates of receipt of psychological therapy for psychosis and schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

International rates of receipt of psychological therapy for psychosis and schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

International rates of receipt of psychological therapy for psychosis and schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: International clinical practice guidelines commonly recommend the provision of psychological therapies for psychosis and schizophrenia as an adjunct to medication. However, access to recommended therapies in routine clinical practice is limited. The aim of this review was to synthesise the available data on the provision of recommended psychological therapies for psychosis and schizophrenia across international mental health systems.

Methods: Electronic databases (PsychINFO, Pubmed and EMBASE) were searched for audits, service evaluation projects, or surveys, which reported data on rates of offer or receipt of any recommended psychological therapy or therapeutic intervention as part of routine clinical care.

Results: Twenty-two eligible studies from 9 countries were identified (N participants = 79,407). The most commonly recommended therapies in national guidelines were Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy for Psychosis (CBTp) and Family Interventions (FI). The overall pooled prevalence of rate of receipt of CBTp was 24% [95% CI 0.15-0.32] based on 15 studies (N = 42,494), with a higher rate of receipt of therapy found when pooling data from Early Intervention services only (41% [95% CI 0.21-0.60], 6 studies, N = 11,068). The overall pooled prevalence of rate of receipt of FI was 30% [95% CI 0.22-0.37] based on 14 studies (N = 13,863).

Conclusions: Overall rates of receipt of recommended psychological therapies for psychosis were low across the 9 countries data were available for in this review. However, there were high rates of heterogeneity across studies, meaning that pooled estimates should be interpreted with caution. Sources of heterogeneity included different service settings (e.g. early intervention vs. non-early intervention services), and varying methods used to collect the data (e.g. audit of electronic health records vs. self-report etc.). There were no available data from the continents of South America, Asia, or Africa, meaning that a truly global picture of provision of psychological therapies for psychosis and schizophrenia is currently lacking.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信