将情感融入临床决策解决方案

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Irene Y. Zhang , Joshua M. Liao
{"title":"将情感融入临床决策解决方案","authors":"Irene Y. Zhang ,&nbsp;Joshua M. Liao","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Health and emotions are inexorably connected. Yet there is still little emphasis on emotions in many clinical decision-making tools and interventions. Instead, existing solutions have tended to target cognition – how people comprehend and act on information about health and disease. While clear thinking contributes to better choices, a potential consequence of heavily targeting cognition is an under-emphasis on emotions - a tendency to work on improving how people think about health care choices without addressing how they feel about them. Several solutions can help clinicians and behavioral scientists address these dynamics: critically evaluating current decision-making conceptual frameworks and strategies, searching for areas where emotions may play a role and where they may have been overlooked; and filling any identified gaps by drawing on insights from affective science. Clinical decision-making solutions should address how individuals feel, not just how they think.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"9 3","pages":"Article 100569"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100569","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incorporating emotions into clinical decision-making solutions\",\"authors\":\"Irene Y. Zhang ,&nbsp;Joshua M. Liao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100569\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Health and emotions are inexorably connected. Yet there is still little emphasis on emotions in many clinical decision-making tools and interventions. Instead, existing solutions have tended to target cognition – how people comprehend and act on information about health and disease. While clear thinking contributes to better choices, a potential consequence of heavily targeting cognition is an under-emphasis on emotions - a tendency to work on improving how people think about health care choices without addressing how they feel about them. Several solutions can help clinicians and behavioral scientists address these dynamics: critically evaluating current decision-making conceptual frameworks and strategies, searching for areas where emotions may play a role and where they may have been overlooked; and filling any identified gaps by drawing on insights from affective science. Clinical decision-making solutions should address how individuals feel, not just how they think.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100569\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100569\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221307642100052X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221307642100052X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

健康和情绪是密不可分的。然而,在许多临床决策工具和干预措施中,仍然很少强调情绪。相反,现有的解决方案倾向于以认知为目标——人们如何理解和应对有关健康和疾病的信息。虽然清晰的思维有助于做出更好的选择,但过度以认知为目标的潜在后果是对情绪的重视不足——一种倾向于改善人们对医疗保健选择的看法,而不解决他们对医疗保健选择的感受。有几个解决方案可以帮助临床医生和行为科学家解决这些动态:批判性地评估当前的决策概念框架和策略,寻找情绪可能发挥作用的领域,以及它们可能被忽视的领域;并利用情感科学的见解来填补任何已确定的空白。临床决策解决方案应该考虑个人的感受,而不仅仅是他们的想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incorporating emotions into clinical decision-making solutions

Health and emotions are inexorably connected. Yet there is still little emphasis on emotions in many clinical decision-making tools and interventions. Instead, existing solutions have tended to target cognition – how people comprehend and act on information about health and disease. While clear thinking contributes to better choices, a potential consequence of heavily targeting cognition is an under-emphasis on emotions - a tendency to work on improving how people think about health care choices without addressing how they feel about them. Several solutions can help clinicians and behavioral scientists address these dynamics: critically evaluating current decision-making conceptual frameworks and strategies, searching for areas where emotions may play a role and where they may have been overlooked; and filling any identified gaps by drawing on insights from affective science. Clinical decision-making solutions should address how individuals feel, not just how they think.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: HealthCare: The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation is a quarterly journal. The journal promotes cutting edge research on innovation in healthcare delivery, including improvements in systems, processes, management, and applied information technology. The journal welcomes submissions of original research articles, case studies capturing "policy to practice" or "implementation of best practices", commentaries, and critical reviews of relevant novel programs and products. The scope of the journal includes topics directly related to delivering healthcare, such as: ● Care redesign ● Applied health IT ● Payment innovation ● Managerial innovation ● Quality improvement (QI) research ● New training and education models ● Comparative delivery innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信