Tuğba Emekci, Mehmet Akif Dündar, Gülce Kirazlı, Feyza İnceoğlu, Deniz Uğur Cengiz, Fatma Men Kilinç, Ercan Karababa, Seray Muzaç, Şeyda Kaya, Hamdi Arbağ
{"title":"vHIT结果与突触系统根据临床医生的优势手使用。","authors":"Tuğba Emekci, Mehmet Akif Dündar, Gülce Kirazlı, Feyza İnceoğlu, Deniz Uğur Cengiz, Fatma Men Kilinç, Ercan Karababa, Seray Muzaç, Şeyda Kaya, Hamdi Arbağ","doi":"10.3233/VES-220073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>There exists limited information in the literature on dominant hand preference in relation with vHIT applications. The present study aimed to examine the relationship between the clinician's dominant use of right- or left-hand and vHIT results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Synapsys vHIT Ulmer device was used in the study. The tests were administered by 3 clinicians experienced in vHIT, 2 of whom were right-handed and 1 left-handed. The test was applied to the 94 participants three times, one week apart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, the correlation between right-handed clinicians and left-handed clinicians was examined, and in all SCCs, namely RA, LA, RL, LL, RP and LP, a moderate positive significant correlation was found between right-handed1 and right-handed2, between right-handed1 and left-handed, and between right-handed2 and left-handed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, these findings suggested that measures were reliable across test sessions regardless of hand dominancy (right or left). Based on the vHIT results we obtained with three different right- or left-handed clinicians, the clinician should evaluate the results according to the dominant side.</p>","PeriodicalId":49960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation","volume":"33 2","pages":"105-113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"vHIT results with the synapsis system according to clinicians' dominant hand use.\",\"authors\":\"Tuğba Emekci, Mehmet Akif Dündar, Gülce Kirazlı, Feyza İnceoğlu, Deniz Uğur Cengiz, Fatma Men Kilinç, Ercan Karababa, Seray Muzaç, Şeyda Kaya, Hamdi Arbağ\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/VES-220073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>There exists limited information in the literature on dominant hand preference in relation with vHIT applications. The present study aimed to examine the relationship between the clinician's dominant use of right- or left-hand and vHIT results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Synapsys vHIT Ulmer device was used in the study. The tests were administered by 3 clinicians experienced in vHIT, 2 of whom were right-handed and 1 left-handed. The test was applied to the 94 participants three times, one week apart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, the correlation between right-handed clinicians and left-handed clinicians was examined, and in all SCCs, namely RA, LA, RL, LL, RP and LP, a moderate positive significant correlation was found between right-handed1 and right-handed2, between right-handed1 and left-handed, and between right-handed2 and left-handed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, these findings suggested that measures were reliable across test sessions regardless of hand dominancy (right or left). Based on the vHIT results we obtained with three different right- or left-handed clinicians, the clinician should evaluate the results according to the dominant side.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation\",\"volume\":\"33 2\",\"pages\":\"105-113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/VES-220073\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/VES-220073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
vHIT results with the synapsis system according to clinicians' dominant hand use.
Background/objective: There exists limited information in the literature on dominant hand preference in relation with vHIT applications. The present study aimed to examine the relationship between the clinician's dominant use of right- or left-hand and vHIT results.
Methods: A Synapsys vHIT Ulmer device was used in the study. The tests were administered by 3 clinicians experienced in vHIT, 2 of whom were right-handed and 1 left-handed. The test was applied to the 94 participants three times, one week apart.
Results: In this study, the correlation between right-handed clinicians and left-handed clinicians was examined, and in all SCCs, namely RA, LA, RL, LL, RP and LP, a moderate positive significant correlation was found between right-handed1 and right-handed2, between right-handed1 and left-handed, and between right-handed2 and left-handed.
Conclusions: In this study, these findings suggested that measures were reliable across test sessions regardless of hand dominancy (right or left). Based on the vHIT results we obtained with three different right- or left-handed clinicians, the clinician should evaluate the results according to the dominant side.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Vestibular Research is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes experimental and observational studies, review papers, and theoretical papers based on current knowledge of the vestibular system. Subjects of the studies can include experimental animals, normal humans, and humans with vestibular or other related disorders. Study topics can include the following:
Anatomy of the vestibular system, including vestibulo-ocular, vestibulo-spinal, and vestibulo-autonomic pathways
Balance disorders
Neurochemistry and neuropharmacology of balance, both at the systems and single neuron level
Neurophysiology of balance, including the vestibular, ocular motor, autonomic, and postural control systems
Psychophysics of spatial orientation
Space and motion sickness
Vestibular rehabilitation
Vestibular-related human performance in various environments